CinC Trump Bans Transgenders In The Military

[phrodeau]

Well, it's about time.

https://www.polyvore.com/cgi/img-thing?.out=jpg&size=l&tid=174867455

 

[LadyFunkenstein]

Well, it's about time.

https://www.polyvore.com/cgi/img-thing?.out=jpg&size=l&tid=174867455

That character is a cross dresser, not a transgender. How dare you conflate the two.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

That character is a cross dresser, not a transgender. How dare you conflate the two.

And he was only doing it to try and get out of the draft.


Every employer has the right to screen its employees, otherwise, the military would have to accept pacifists who only joined to not ever go to combat.

 

[Que]

That character is a cross dresser, not a transgender. How dare you conflate the two.

Those that are sure they are on the "right side" regularly show an astonishing level of ignorance about the issues involved. They regularly conflate fetishism with gender diasphora, and assume because it is included in GBLT that it has anything to do with sexual orientation.

 

[phrodeau]

That character is a cross dresser, not a transgender. How dare you conflate the two.

How dare you make a judgment based on appearance.

 

[Rightguide]

You're full of shit. There is NO place in the military for Trannies, none at all. Trump isn't shamed, he's made the proper decision.

Ishmael

Yes, now they can get back to killing people and breaking things instead of underwriting and babysitting a bunch of mentally ill security risks. We might recall Obama entered into this policy without any consultation with generals and Admirals who run the military. He simply thought it would be a good way to pander to .03% of the population while undermining our combat capability in the long term. Yes, I said it.

Trump did the right thing. Serving in the United States military is a privilege, not a right and it has every right to discriminate against segments of society if it affects the good order and discipline of our military and nobody knows better than they what that entails.

 

[Ishmael]

It's not about gender, but about sexual confusion. We've already learned that this sort of confusion leads to Bradley Manning.

Case in point. If there was any silver lining in Obama's commutation of Mannings sentence it's that if Chelsea wants a pussy it's going to have to pay for it itself, no more free ride on the taxpayers dollars.

Ishmael

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

Why shouldn't trans people be in the military? I thought they were so dangerous that I should be afraid to be in the bathroom with them.

 

[Hypoxia]

Serving in the United States military is a privilege, not a right...

No, serving IS a right. You ignore the history of the 2nd Amendment.

Britain had a history of excluding entire classes from military service. Anglicans could bear arms for the King; Jews, Catholics, Dissenters / NonConformists etc could not. The 2nd's "right to bear arms" was not an individual right for gun nuts, but a guarantee that ALL citizens have the right to "bear arms" to defend the nation. Excluding classes like LGBTs violates that principle. Patriots of any plumbing who wish to put their lives on the line should be applauded and honored, not despised. Shameful!

 

[coachdb18]

No, serving IS a right. You ignore the history of the 2nd Amendment.

Britain had a history of excluding entire classes from military service. Anglicans could bear arms for the King; Jews, Catholics, Dissenters / NonConformists etc could not. The 2nd's "right to bear arms" was not an individual right for gun nuts, but a guarantee that ALL citizens have the right to "bear arms" to defend the nation. Excluding classes like LGBTs violates that principle. Patriots of any plumbing who wish to put their lives on the line should be applauded and honored, not despised. Shameful!

In America, we serve the Constitution, not a President, not a Queen, not a Führer,
Yes, our Constitution and our military serves to protect transgenders too, but there's a vetting process as to who has the 'right stuff' to be the protector... but all are protectees...

As the Captain of the submarine in 'Crimson Tide' said, We're here to preserve democracy, not to practice it'.

And the 2nd Amendment is in fact an individual right...

 

[Rightguide]

No, serving IS a right. You ignore the history of the 2nd Amendment.

You're full of shit.

 

[Ishmael]

You're full of shit.

As always. The 2nd. amendment is an individual right. That argument is over......finally. If a tranny wants to go down to the gun store and buy a gun there's nothing stopping it.

Ishmael

 

[phrodeau]

You're full of shit.

We all know the NRA's position. It doesn't mean that they're correct.

 

[EternalFantasies]

You're full of shit.

That would be correct.

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

As always. The 2nd. amendment is an individual right. That argument is over......finally. If a tranny wants to go down to the gun store and buy a gun there's nothing stopping it.

Ishmael

It? Wow, you have some issues with yourself you need to work on.

 

[Ishmael]

It? Wow, you have some issues with yourself you need to work on.

No I don't. Merely a recognition of their state of mental confusion.

Ishmael

 

[phrodeau]

No I don't. Merely a recognition of their state of mental confusion.

Ishmael

You mean, "its state of mental confusion."

 

[Rightguide]

As always. The 2nd. amendment is an individual right. That argument is over......finally. If a tranny wants to go down to the gun store and buy a gun there's nothing stopping it.

Ishmael

That would be correct.

Hard to imagine where he came up with that hairbrained idea.

 

[Hypoxia]

And the 2nd Amendment is in fact an individual right...

That is not its history. Look it up.

 

[Rightguide]

That is not its history. Look it up.

It doesn't have a damn thing to do with qualifications for joining today's professional military, period.

 

[EternalFantasies]

That is not its history. Look it up.

I'm afraid you do not get it's history / raison d'etre.

It strictly concern the people's rights, and so, due to the transition from monarchy to democracy. This has its risks, and morons could become in power, and play King (ya ya, u gonna say Tromp), so the people at that point have a right to a miltia and overturn that state.

 

[BotanyBoy]

Why shouldn't trans people be in the military?

Because there is no trans, there is only green

No, serving IS a right.

BAHAHAHA!!!! No the fuck it's not.

We all know the NRA's position. It doesn't mean that they're correct.

Except they are correct.

That is not its history. Look it up.

It's history doesn't change the fact that it is an individual right.

 

[Disgustipated]

You dumbfucks are far more confused than any transgender person. Holy shit, the hypocrisy is truly amazing.

 

[RobDownSouth]

And the 2nd Amendment is in fact an individual right...

Yup. Since waaaaay back in 2008, when "Justice" Scalia legislated from the bench that a "well-regulated militia" was synonymous with "an army of one".

 

[BotanyBoy]

Yup. Since waaaaay back in 2008, when "Justice" Scalia legislated from the bench that a "well-regulated militia" was synonymous with "an army of one".

More like when the shit was written.

"well-regulated militia" contrary to most (D)'s belief isn't a prerequisite for the right of the people to bear arms and nothing about it even comes close to suggesting as much.

Especially when you consider what the definition of militia is.

But all that aside I have to ask why would every other right in the BOR an individual right, but not the 2nd?