We FOUND the COLLUSION!

And they routinely claim that they are only doing what the other team did to Obama...

Funny. I don't recall the constant call for impeachment.

Wow.

That must've been some sleep you had for eight years, Rip Van Shrinkle!

http://m5.paperblog.com/i/58/582535/impeach-obama-overpass-movement-spreads-acros-L-sBoqUT.jpeg

http://barenakedislam.files.wordpress.com/2011/04/impeach-obama-billboard.jpg?resize=590%2C391

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/ZneuCU8bszo/hqdefault.jpg

http://www.wnd.com/files/2012/02/ImpeachNow32.jpg

https://ioncoalition.files.wordpress.com/2015/02/b91c7eciqaaatj_.jpg

http://a57.foxnews.com/media2.foxnews.com/thumbnails/i/070814/780/438/070814_palin_1014.jpg

http://www.wnd.com/files/2013/08/impeach_overpass.jpg

http://www.msnbc.com/sites/msnbc/files/styles/ratio--3-2--830x553/public/ap413596819225.jpg?itok=dNo5JJvb

https://overpassesforamerica.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/indy-protest.jpg

https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSFARqEiKe0lUNmIxOLpbG6GkkxzXsUONzmI5s48SSG-MQ09Nib

No Photoshops, no horribly designed memes, no CGI tricks from Lucasfilm Ltd. Them's happened for realsies. And I remember all the parallel yap on this site that you and your glee club made in complete concert rhythm.

So sit your "not-Republican" ass down in that corner and blow your Trumpet if you can't deal with the here and now, Ayn Rand.
 
More news

She was denied Visa, and the DarkieKenyans DOJ allowed her in

Under special circumstance....hmmmm

http://thehill.com/homenews/adminis...sian-lawyer-into-us-before-she-met-with-trump

Simply put, as The Hill notes, this revelation means it was the Obama Justice Department that enabled the newest and most intriguing figure in the Russia-Trump investigation to enter the country without a visa...WHY?????????????...........and if read the email that enticed DTJ to come to the meeting, YOU SMELL SETUP right away!
 
The trump regime is already the most corrupt and least liked regime in US history. It's going to be rough up until the impeachment.
 
Okay, then I'm sure you'll be more than happy to cite that for me? Thank you in advance. Where I am standing the dossier was part the basis for the for the FBI investigation, the FISA warrant, held up by Jr's tweeting, omong many other things that point to it's veracity.

All three intel heads have testified under oath there is no evidence of Russian/Trump collusion which is the primary accusation advanced by the "dossier." Even Christopher Steele, the ex-British spy who authored the dossier admitted in a court filing the report was unverifiable and not meant for public release.
 
The trump regime is already the most corrupt and least liked regime in US history. It's going to be rough up until the impeachment.

So far only one additional Democrat has signed on to Sherman's bill of impeachment, so good luck on that.
 
Notice how AJ_AJ_Trump, ever since that epic smackdown by Zumi, has scurried out of this thread like a little bitch. :D
 

C'mon, Johnny, get serious. That statute clearly has to do with financial contributions from foreign nationals. No reasonable legal interpretation is going to extend the reach of a "thing of value" to gossip about campaign "dirt" or, for that matter, actual prior illegal behavior on the part of a political candidate.

On the other hand, KNOWLEDGE of actual illegal candidate behavior would, indeed, be "valuable" to BOTH opposition candidates and the voters at large if such behavior existed in fact. Is it your belief we should be excluded from having that knowledge simply because it is in the possession of a foreign national?

I don't think so.
 
C'mon, Johnny, get serious. That statute clearly has to do with financial contributions from foreign nationals. No reasonable legal interpretation is going to extend the reach of a "thing of value" to gossip about campaign "dirt" or, for that matter, actual prior illegal behavior on the part of a political candidate.

On the other hand, KNOWLEDGE of actual illegal candidate behavior would, indeed, be "valuable" to BOTH opposition candidates and the voters at large if such behavior existed in fact. Is it your belief we should be excluded from having that knowledge simply because it is in the possession of a foreign national?

I don't think so.

Peruse the FEC's opinions. Voter rolls have been found to count as a 'thing of value'. It's not a stretch to imagine that dirt on an opponent would also count. That is... "value" is not just money.

The Prosecution:

Junior thought the Russian government was going to give him dirt on HRC. Junior agreed to meet with someone he thought represented the Russian government to receive that information.

Dirt on HRC would have value to the Trump campaign and was being offered by a foreign government.



I take no position on the matter, just laying out the possible charge as I was asked to do.


Pay me $450 per hour and I'll lay out the defense.

The first opinion is free.
 
C'mon, Johnny, get serious. That statute clearly has to do with financial contributions from foreign nationals. No reasonable legal interpretation is going to extend the reach of a "thing of value" to gossip about campaign "dirt" or, for that matter, actual prior illegal behavior on the part of a political candidate.

On the other hand, KNOWLEDGE of actual illegal candidate behavior would, indeed, be "valuable" to BOTH opposition candidates and the voters at large if such behavior existed in fact. Is it your belief we should be excluded from having that knowledge simply because it is in the possession of a foreign national?

I don't think so.

It clearly states it covers donations.

(e)Donation. For purposes of part 300, donation means a payment, gift, subscription, loan, advance, deposit, or anything of value given to a person, but does not include contributions.

That covers in-kind donations for opposition research.
 
All three intel heads have testified under oath there is no evidence of Russian/Trump collusion which is the primary accusation advanced by the "dossier." Even Christopher Steele, the ex-British spy who authored the dossier admitted in a court filing the report was unverifiable and not meant for public release.

Not exactly.

Asked if there was collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia, Brennan said he did not know. But he said Russian intelligence was actively seeking to suborn Americans and that a number of contacts had taken place with campaign officials.

"I encountered and am aware of information and intelligence that revealed contacts and interactions between Russian officials and U.S. persons involved in the Trump campaign that I was concerned about because of known Russian efforts to suborn such individuals, and it raised questions in my mind whether or not the Russians were able gain the cooperation of those individuals, " Brennan told the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence.

"I don't know whether or not such ‘collusion' existed. I don't know," he added. "But there was a sufficient basis of information and intelligence that required further investigation to determine whether U.S. persons were actively conspiring, colluding with Russian officials."

During his testimony, Comey was asked by Sen. Richard Burr, the Republican chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, whether the FBI was able to confirm any criminal allegations contained in the document.

Comey replied that he couldn't answer the question in an "open setting," because it "goes into the details" of the FBI's investigation.


James Clapper, the former director of national intelligence, said Wednesday that President Donald Trump had asked him to "refute the infamous dossier" detailing explosive claims about his campaign's ties to Russia, but he "could not and would not" do so.
 
so when will it be axed of Darky Lynch what the special circumstance was to allow this lawyer in when the Visa was denied
 
so when will it be axed of Darky Lynch what the special circumstance was to allow this lawyer in when the Visa was denied

So why aren't the so-called media focusing on this isn't this a big issue isn't this a valid question isn't this a significant inquiry

Why

we know why
 
Any politicians there?


Like we have now?

Sarah Palin is in one of the pictures. LOL


Some other politicians not in those pictures (that I'm aware of):

Tom Tancredo
Allen West
Joni Ernst
Tom Coburn
The South Dakota Republican Party

That was a quick search. I can look for more if you want?
 
Sarah Palin is in one of the pictures. LOL


Some other politicians not in those pictures (that I'm aware of):

Tom Tancredo
Allen West
Joni Ernst
Tom Coburn
The South Dakota Republican Party

That was a quick search. I can look for more if you want?

Found another ...

Rep. Mo Brooks of Alabama
 
Sarah Palin is in one of the pictures. LOL


Some other politicians not in those pictures (that I'm aware of):

Tom Tancredo
Allen West
Joni Ernst
Tom Coburn
The South Dakota Republican Party

That was a quick search. I can look for more if you want?

Found another ...

Rep. Mo Brooks of Alabama

Some more!

Rep. Darrell Issa
Rep. Michael Burgess
Sen. Jon Kyl (impeachment is a possibility)
Rep. Jason Chaffetz (didn't rule it out)
Rep. Kerry Bentivolio
Rep. Louie Gohmert
Sen. Ted Cruz (a good question for the House to assess)
 
Darrell Issa
Michael Burgess
Jon Kyl
KerryBentivolio
Louie Gohmert


And these too. There's really a plethora to choose from.
 
Sarah Palin is in one of the pictures. LOL


Some other politicians not in those pictures (that I'm aware of):

Tom Tancredo
Allen West
Joni Ernst
Tom Coburn
The South Dakota Republican Party

That was a quick search. I can look for more if you want?

Found another ...

Rep. Mo Brooks of Alabama

Some more!

Rep. Darrell Issa
Rep. Michael Burgess
Sen. Jon Kyl (impeachment is a possibility)
Rep. Jason Chaffetz (didn't rule it out)
Rep. Kerry Bentivolio
Rep. Louie Gohmert
Sen. Ted Cruz (a good question for the House to assess)

The list goes on and on ...

Rep. Steve King (R-Iowa)
Rep. Ted Yoho (R-Fla.)
Rep. Joe Barton (R-Texas)
Rep. Dana Rohrabacher (R-Calif.)
Rep. Steve Stockman (R-Texas)
 
Back
Top