Quick project test drawing

DrDelirium

Literotica Guru
Joined
May 14, 2017
Posts
889
I'm working on a (hopefully) quick little one-off comic project. It's got a script, and panel notes, and now I'm doing the character design. Only one character, so that helps...
Anyway, this is her basic highly derivative animanga porn girl look.

https://deliriumseven.tumblr.com/image/161133499541

For a variety of reasons, I am thinking the actual production drawings won't be much tighter than this. This goes against the grain of most anime and manga stuff, which tends to be very clean, but I find it somewhat mechanical much of the time. Any views on whether rough work like this can be adequately porny? (Although, to be honest, the comic hardly qualifies as porn anyway. I still want to answer the question in case there's a second episode that's more explicit. Don't want to be boxed in by my early bad decisions).

Any opinions are welcome.
 
In my opinion at least... It's not so much the drawing style, as it is the subject that makes a drawing/painting porn, erotic or whatever.
Anatomy is also more important: If the drawings are bad, no amount of sex in the picture will make up for it.

A quickly rendered sketchy style of good, realistic anatomy is better than painstakingly rendered bad anatomy.

Some people can abstract/ignore the parts that don't work for them. Others can't... The style in your submitted image would certainly work for me
 
In my opinion at least... It's not so much the drawing style, as it is the subject that makes a drawing/painting porn, erotic or whatever.
Anatomy is also more important: If the drawings are bad, no amount of sex in the picture will make up for it.

A quickly rendered sketchy style of good, realistic anatomy is better than painstakingly rendered bad anatomy.

Some people can abstract/ignore the parts that don't work for them. Others can't... The style in your submitted image would certainly work for me

Thank you for your response. The project got a bit sidetracked by some pixies... but there should be more of it, uh, soon...
 
Back
Top