"Gunfire, explosions heard outside Resorts World Manila" - Yahoo!News

Chris_Michael

2B or Not 2B
Joined
Oct 4, 2015
Posts
5,510
Longest breaking news article ever. Anyway, bets on race and religion?! White KKK members anybody? Black Lives Matter? Muslims?

I'm guessing Scientology and White. That's what I'll go with this time.

LONDON (Reuters) - Gunfire and explosions have been heard outside the Resorts World hotel in Manila, CNN Philippines reported on its Twitter feed.

It said police, fire trucks and a SWAT team were in the area.

(Reporting by Jeremy Gaunt)
 
Looks like the body count is going up in celebration of ramadan. The religon of peace is hard at work again.
 
This is not new. There have been insurgents of one description or another in the Philippines since the end of WWII. If not before. Used to be Communist but that became unfashionable of recent years and Islam has taken over. If the Muslims win the next group will be Christians.
 
Robbery gone bad. Only one person who set tables on fire. One other thing:

Police said the gunman was tall with a pale complexion and spoke English.​

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-philippines-resort-idUSKBN18S63W

Dela Rosa added that the lone gunman, described as being “foreign-looking” and “Caucasian” parked on the second floor, then “barged” into the Resorts World casino, stealing casino chips and firing at TV screens. He also poured gasoline on tables, setting them ablaze.​

http://www.marketwatch.com/story/manila-casino-assault-called-robbery-not-terrorism-2017-06-01
 
Last edited:
It still might have been a terrorist attack of sorts, based on what the gunman did. He destroyed gambling equipment before immolating himself. He may have been some kind of anti-vice terrorist, such as those who bomb night clubs. His actions don't sound like those of a robber.
 
Robbery gone bad. Only one person who set tables on fire. One other thing:

Police said the gunman was tall with a pale complexion and spoke English.​

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-philippines-resort-idUSKBN18S63W

Dela Rosa added that the lone gunman, described as being “foreign-looking” and “Caucasian” parked on the second floor, then “barged” into the Resorts World casino, stealing casino chips and firing at TV screens. He also poured gasoline on tables, setting them ablaze.​

http://www.marketwatch.com/story/manila-casino-assault-called-robbery-not-terrorism-2017-06-01

Did they happen to say anything about Scientology?! Pleeeeaaase be a Scientologist!
 
It still might have been a terrorist attack of sorts, based on what the gunman did. He destroyed gambling equipment before immolating himself. He may have been some kind of anti-vice terrorist, such as those who bomb night clubs. His actions don't sound like those of a robber.

Keep wishing. The guy apparently lost money at the casino and wanted to get his money back.

It's as simple as that. White guy criminal kills 36 people because he can't handle losing.
 
Keep wishing. The guy apparently lost money at the casino and wanted to get his money back.

It's as simple as that. White guy criminal kills 36 people because he can't handle losing.

Nobody was shot and the perp killed himself. The pic of him doesn't look very white.
 
Last edited:
So Chris, box, that racist lady who made up lies about meeting Muslim people when are you going to condemn white people as the race of violence and English as the language of violence? Are you going to ban white people from entering the U.S.? Are you going to tell white people to stop stealing our jobs? Are you going to sign up with your local military to fight the evil that is whiteness? Well, are you?

Manila police chief Oscar Albayalde told reporters that police think it's likely the suspect was a foreigner. "He looks Caucasian, he talks English, he's big and he's white, so he's probably a foreigner," he said.
 
So Chris, box, that racist lady who made up lies about meeting Muslim people when are you going to condemn white people as the race of violence and English as the language of violence? Are you going to ban white people from entering the U.S.? Are you going to tell white people to stop stealing our jobs? Are you going to sign up with your local military to fight the evil that is whiteness? Well, are you?

Manila police chief Oscar Albayalde told reporters that police think it's likely the suspect was a foreigner. "He looks Caucasian, he talks English, he's big and he's white, so he's probably a foreigner," he said.

There is no such thing as a language of violence and, if there were, it would not be English. If you want to see what the race of violence is in the USA, look at the statistics for violent crime. Even then, this is an individual thing, not a group thing.

As for the perp in Manila, there is a link with a pic of him in one of the posts here. To me, he looks like a light-skinned African American. He is probably more white than black, which might lead the Asian police chief to describe him as Caucasian. Whether black or white, he would speak English and be physically larger than most Filipinos.

ETA: That's the second pic in the link from Reuters, which is on Post #9.
 
Last edited:
So Chris, box, that racist lady who made up lies about meeting Muslim people when are you going to condemn white people as the race of violence and English as the language of violence? Are you going to ban white people from entering the U.S.? Are you going to tell white people to stop stealing our jobs? Are you going to sign up with your local military to fight the evil that is whiteness? Well, are you?

Manila police chief Oscar Albayalde told reporters that police think it's likely the suspect was a foreigner. "He looks Caucasian, he talks English, he's big and he's white, so he's probably a foreigner," he said.

Me? You're talking to me? Lol. Okay, This was in the Philippines, right? That place the us military used to have bases in where military guys do what military guys do with cute Asian girls and then have kids now and then? That place? The perp might look Caucasian but he's probably some mixed race guy, maybe from there? No idea coz I haven't read any of it or even looked. It's there, not here so I don't really care.
Anyhow, nothing to do with English, that's just a language. I don't have an English gene in my body but seriously, if you look at the stats by race for the US you'll see which group is more violent.

One clue. It's not psychopathic part-Asian girls. In fact it's not Asians and it's not whites. That may help you narrow it down a little. Keep working on it and you'll get there eventually. Just don't let that trusting nature of yours lead you into danger. And whatever you do don't go cycling thru New Orleans, I hear that can be a little risky for white girls and boys these days.
 
So none of you are going to condemn whites as the creators of violence? I mean I knew right wingers were a bunch of racist hypocrites but this is pretty low even for you guys

Nope. Lol. Not even a good try, buddy. You better ask Carnal Flower for some coaching. And, well, violence has its place in the greater scheme of things.
 
Nope. Lol. Not even a good try, buddy. You better ask Carnal Flower for some coaching. And, well, violence has its place in the greater scheme of things.

If violence has its place you can't whine about some Muslim killing someone because they believe their religion has been insulted. After all, there is a greater scheme of things.

You can't have it both ways. If whites created everything we see, as white supremacists like Steve Bannon routinely point out, they are also responsible for the violence they have created.

Just like white men are the vast majority of child molesters and rapists, yet you never hear anyone talking about creating a database to track them.

Get over it. The terrorist was white and he killed 36 people because his fragile ego, like that of the con artist, couldn't take losing at the tables.
 
If violence has its place you can't whine about some Muslim killing someone because they believe their religion has been insulted. After all, there is a greater scheme of things.

You can't have it both ways. If whites created everything we see, as white supremacists like Steve Bannon routinely point out, they are also responsible for the violence they have created.

Just like white men are the vast majority of child molesters and rapists, yet you never hear anyone talking about creating a database to track them.

Get over it. The terrorist was white and he killed 36 people because his fragile ego, like that of the con artist, couldn't take losing at the tables.

Insanity and delusions. Can't argue with 'em. Can't reason with 'em. Don't like cold hard facts. Pass the puppies and crayons, guys, we got another one on the loose here.
 
Last edited:
If violence has its place you can't whine about some Muslim killing someone because they believe their religion has been insulted. After all, there is a greater scheme of things.

You can't have it both ways. If whites created everything we see, as white supremacists like Steve Bannon routinely point out, they are also responsible for the violence they have created.

Just like white men are the vast majority of child molesters and rapists, yet you never hear anyone talking about creating a database to track them.

Get over it. The terrorist was white and he killed 36 people because his fragile ego, like that of the con artist, couldn't take losing at the tables.

Woah woah, let's not start getting upset when somebody other than a Liberal says, "Violence is okay." You guys support a whole host of violent groups, and support the notion that free speech comes with "consequences."

You hear all the Islamic terrorism going on throughout the entire world and shrug it off as if any criticism about it is unjust, "racist," or bigoted. You know BLM, Antifa, and Berkeley riots are happening, and you somehow think it's just.

And then, when a white man body slams a reporter, you lose your goddamn minds! "Oh my gawd, think of the children! Oh noooo! White men!"

You act as if we turn a blind eye to white people who commit such outrageous crimes! We don't. Now, as far as this particular forum goes, there's no point in having a reasonable conversation about it because all you get is people from the Left turning it into overkill "LOOK WHAT WHITIES DOIN!" And if they aren't white, it's just behavior.

So, who's defending violence again? You. So don't get upset when somebody who doesn't agree with your narrative thinks that violence is okay. That's what we call a double standard and complete horseshit.

Because I know at least one person who would say they would punch Chloe based on her words on this website alone. And they are one of you Leftist animals.
 
.....Because I know at least one person who would say they would punch Chloe based on her words on this website alone. And they are one of you Leftist animals.

Oh no. Someone here wants to punch me? So much for open debate. Just have to remember I live in an open carry state, I do except at work and I love my tae kwon do and Hapkido and the master I train under doesn't believe in Olympic rules or a fair fight. And I do a lot of sparring. I'm the one with lots of bruises. Unless you're good, it'll be a bit one-sided I'm afraid coz yeah, my last actual fight which was a while ago now lasted about 5 seconds and that was coz I pulled it. Doc martens are great. Stop you from hurting your toes. And Carnal Flower has one thing right about me. LOL.

Although seriously, I'd run away.
 
If violence has its place you can't whine about some Muslim killing someone because they believe their religion has been insulted. After all, there is a greater scheme of things.

You can't have it both ways. If whites created everything we see, as white supremacists like Steve Bannon routinely point out, they are also responsible for the violence they have created.

Just like white men are the vast majority of child molesters and rapists, yet you never hear anyone talking about creating a database to track them.

Get over it. The terrorist was white and he killed 36 people because his fragile ego, like that of the con artist, couldn't take losing at the tables.

The DOJ does maintain a data base of known criminals and child molesters.

https://www.nsopw.gov/?AspxAutoDetectCookieSupport=1
 
Maybe if you're gullible enough to blindly believe what Chris posts--and I think you are.

Oh Chris is a sweetheart. And so are you, you teddy bear you. But no, I take everything here with more than a grain of salt. I do hope the inverse is true. Because a real fight? I'd run so fast .... lol .... faster than an sr71 with its turbo poster or afterburners or whatever they are on ....
 
Last edited:
Oh Chris is a sweetheart. And so are you, you teddy bear you. But no, I take everything here with more than a grain of salt. I do hope the inverse is true. Because a real fight? I'd run so fast .... lol .... faster than an sr71 with its turbo poster or afterburners or whatever they are on ....

I just want to make it clear that nobody said they wanted to punch you in the face. But there is at least one person who has directly said that they would *advocate* a person who expresses "bigoted" opinions to be punched in the face. Such bigoted opinions include me openly expressing that I think feminism is stupid. So, I would imagine that if I should be punched in the face for that, then what else could be so offensive and bigoted that would warrant violence.

I bet if you were to say, "I disagree with Liberals," then these people would think a punch in the face is warranted. I bet if you said, "Donald Trump is the POTUS," they would think you deserve to be punched in the face.

This all ties back to a thread I made about what exactly is free speech. It turns out the Left wants suppression of expression. The Liberals are anti liberal.

Because Logic.

What I say is the expressed views of only myself and I do not speak for Chloe. None of my statements are her opinions. Only she can speak on behalf of what she thinks.
 
Back
Top