On Fox and Friends Gingrich rails against rumors Seth Rich was assassinated

I feel sorry for americans... the sheer volume and layers of bullshit you are exposed to seriously compromises your ability to enjoy your lives.

Not sorry enough to use a capital letter with Americans?
 
That might not be a bad idea, actually. At any rate, I've read the Chinese are working on something similar.

With the cuts to the NASA budget, forget it. I think they have to develop coal based rocket fuel to keep any funding.
 
Also, there is no proof whatsoever that Rich leaked anything to Wikileaks, yet Gingrich and his ill ilk keep repeating that as an established fact.

Sean Hannity calls himself the victim as evidence emerges that Seth Rich was not the WikiLeaks source.

And what is more:

On Tuesday night’s “Hannity,” the news host basically admitted that he was using the Rich story to run interference for President Donald Trump.

“There are so many issues here,” he said about Rich’s conspiracy theory. “Not the least of which is the Democratic push of their Russia narrative.”

“The destroy-Trump media, the Democrats, they have been pushing that Russian tinfoil hat conspiracy with zero evidence,” he added, without a hint of irony.
 
Why the sarcasm quotes for a licenced private investigator who is also a retired homicide detective in the jurisdiction where this happened? Is it because he is black that you dismiss his professional experience?
:rolleyes:
What a dumbass.
 
:rolleyes:
What a dumbass.

You both doubt his credentials AND call him a dumbass, why?

You didn't even attempt to refute that your dismissal of him was because he is black. So that's it? That seems pretty racist.

After 8 years of conservatives hearing, "You just don't like the progressive president because he's black" we are more than entitled to apply the very same standards.

In this case you very specifically denigrated the professional credentials of a black investigator.
 
Last edited:
You both doubt his credentials AND call him a dumbass, why?

You didn't even attempt to refute that your dismissal of him was because he is black. So that's it? That seems pretty racist.

After 8 years of conservatives hearing, "You just don't like the progressive president because he's black" we are more than entitled to apply the very same standards.

In this case you very specifically denigrated the professional credentials of a black investigator.
You've lost it, lady-boi Connie. YOU are the dumbass and just proved it.
 
Oh, look. He almost got the timestamps to "prove" that despite always having an easilly recognized "voice," signature goals, and M.O., it is totes not him at all.

I was very bemused the other day when several posters were (probably correctly) pointing out that a couple of "new" posters are easilly recognizable from the "sound", but cannot appliy Hakim's razor to what their "ears" have told them for 15 years.

I am equally amused at the significant number of people who will refer to all such commentary by me on the subject as an obsession after my 4 months of radio silence, but do not see the daily, all conduming drumbeat of my biggest fan attacking every single day either directly, as above, or through the idiot surrogate he has chosen to represent his rage at my continued, unfazed existence here.

It has been nothing but amusing to me once I tracked him personally to discover every detail of his empty existance, and he rails against an internet login that I could discard tomorrow. I did it quite sucessfully before with this very login, and am more than prepared to do it again tomorrow, if I so choose.

#SoMuchWinningVsWindmills
 
Last edited:
Oh, look. He almost got the timestamps to "prove" that despite always having an easilly recognized "voice," signature goals, and M.O., it is totes not him at all.

I was very bemused the other day when several posters were (probably correctly) pointing out that a couple of "new" posters are easilly recognizable from the "sound", but cannot appliy Hakim's razor to what their "ears" have told them for 15 years.

I am equally amused at the significant number of people who will refer to all such commentary by me on the subject as an obsession after my 4 months of radio silence, but do not see the daily, all conduming drumbeat of my biggest fan attacking every single day either directly, as above, or through the idiot surrogate he has chosen to represent his rage at my continued, unfazed existence here.

It has been nothing but amusing to me once I tracked him personally to discover every detail of his empty existance, and he rails against an internet login that I could discard tomorrow. I did it quite sucessfully before with this very login, and am more than prepared to do it again tomorrow, if I so choose.

#SoMuchWinningVsWindmills



You edited this hot meth?
 
You both doubt his credentials AND call him a dumbass, why?

You didn't even attempt to refute that your dismissal of him was because he is black. So that's it? That seems pretty racist.

After 8 years of conservatives hearing, "You just don't like the progressive president because he's black" we are more than entitled to apply the very same standards.

In this case you very specifically denigrated the professional credentials of a black investigator.

LOL, he was such a great source that Fox news had to retract the story based on what he said.

Come on, even you're not this stupid.
 
LOL, he was such a great source that Fox news had to retract the story based on what he said.

Come on, even you're not this stupid.

He could well be an incompetent one, but at issue is not his utility as a source, rather it is about About Average's insinuation that a retired, black, homicide detective with a private investigator's license, duly issued by competant authority in the jurisdiction that he offers investigatory services to the public is not an actual investigator. Because reasons.

Even you cannot be so stupid not to understand the clear implication of AA refering to him as an "investigator."

Why would you want to participate in the furtherance of such obvious an example of institutional racism? Why are you not denouncing this?
 
How many unexplained bodies are tied to the Clit'ns? I've lost count ... 6? 7?
 
Sure he is, as evidenced by his statement that I highlighted.

So is your disdain for the man's credentials because of his race, or not?

I could see the first quotation mark being a typo but I would think the close quote suggests that you meant to put investigator in sarcasm quotes.
 
He could well be an incompetent one, but at issue is not his utility as a source, rather it is about About Average's insinuation that a retired, black, homicide detective with a private investigator's license, duly issued by competant authority in the jurisdiction that he offers investigatory services to the public is not an actual investigator. Because reasons.

Even you cannot be so stupid not to understand the clear implication of AA refering to him as an "investigator."

Why would you want to participate in the furtherance of such obvious an example of institutional racism? Why are you not denouncing this?

Are you off your meds or something?

I saw no clear or even obtuse example of institutional racism in his comment.

Maybe he called him an "investigator" because that's his actual title? Private Investigator.

This is Vetteman level stupidity.
 
Are you off your meds or something?

I saw no clear or even obtuse example of institutional racism in his comment.

Maybe he called him an "investigator" because that's his actual title? Private Investigator.

This is Vetteman level stupidity.

You using quotes is quoting him. Him using quotes was dissmissive. Do you really not understand this? One does not use quotes to deliniate job titles.

Do you type, "My "garbage man" picked up my garbage this morning with his big "garbage truck?""

How about, "The "pollice officer" pulled me over for speeding?"

Or, "The "Principal" of the school sent home a note of reprimand?"
 
Oh, look. He almost got the timestamps to "prove" that despite always having an easilly recognized "voice," signature goals, and M.O., it is totes not him at all.

I was very bemused the other day when several posters were (probably correctly) pointing out that a couple of "new" posters are easilly recognizable from the "sound", but cannot appliy Hakim's razor to what their "ears" have told them for 15 years.

I am equally amused at the significant number of people who will refer to all such commentary by me on the subject as an obsession after my 4 months of radio silence, but do not see the daily, all conduming drumbeat of my biggest fan attacking every single day either directly, as above, or through the idiot surrogate he has chosen to represent his rage at my continued, unfazed existence here.

It has been nothing but amusing to me once I tracked him personally to discover every detail of his empty existance, and he rails against an internet login that I could discard tomorrow. I did it quite sucessfully before with this very login, and am more than prepared to do it again tomorrow, if I so choose.

#SoMuchWinningVsWindmills

Is little Conager threatening people with his attack alts again. Yes, queery, we all know you have an army of disposable alts. Too bad for you that you're all bark and no bite. Probably reason #78 why your wife left with your children.;)
 
You folk are arguing with Yank conspiracy nutters. Just bide your time and they will all eventually fall victim to alien abduction. Maybe the more stupid ones will be subjected to mutilation and alien probe insertions.

And all you conspiracy nutters just post, "But... but... Clinton/Obama/Liberals..." and that should cover any facts or arguments you might want to produce off the top of your head, pull out of your ass or parrot from alt-right blogs.
 
Is little Conager threatening people with his attack alts again. Yes, queery, we all know you have an army of disposable alts. Too bad for you that you're all bark and no bite. Probably reason #78 why your wife left with your children.;)

You feel "threatened" if I simply, successfully fade from your neverending campaign, as I did with Conager?

Never fear, I'm sure you'll find a replacement to rail against in order embiiggen your fragil sense of self-worth.

SMH. Five decades of lashing out at others to hide your fears of being that not-so-little, picked-on, chubby kid. Kids can be cruel. Most grow out of the urge to bully, and their fears of being bullied. Sad.
 
Back
Top