CNN anchor: Is it better for the GOP to win elections or lose elections?

[james_1957]

On Thursday night, CNN’s Don Lemon wondered if losing elections rather than winning would actually be more beneficial to the Republican party.

The topic was Montana’s special election for Congress, and CNN had spent the past 24 hours replaying audio of the GOP candidate allegedly “body slamming” a reporter.

As the votes were tallied and it became evident that Greg Gianforte, the GOP candidate, would prevail victorious, Lemon shifted gears. No longer was this special election a referendum on President Trump. No longer was this about how much voters did or didn’t respect the media.

Now, instead, we must explore how winning may actually be a bad thing for the GOP. Lemon asked CNN analyst Gloria Borger, “what’s better then for the Republican party? Is it better for Gianforte winning, or him losing this election?”

http://dailycaller.com/2017/05/26/d...r-the-gop-to-win-elections-or-lose-elections/

 

[KingOrfeo]

In this particular instance, losing would have been better. The House Republican Caucus has just acquired a sad embarrassment.

 

[Conager]

In this particular instance, losing would have been better. The House Republican Caucus has just acquired a sad embarrassment.

I'm sure they are bitter about winning an election tbat the Dems characterized as a referendum on Trump and wasted lots of outside money on.

They will soldier on, despite their dissapointment with this ignominious victory.

 

[KingOrfeo]

It certainly would have been better for the GOP to lose the last presidential election, too; the party will pay a very high price for that victory.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

PROCEDURE RedneckTranslation(KOstatement)


RETURN (The Democrats are really winning by losing.)