Did DNC Chair Tom Perez threaten pro-life Democrats?

james_1957

Literotica Guru
Joined
Aug 2, 2005
Posts
778
Much love to my friends in the Democratic Party. I wish you well.

Democratic National Committee Chair Tom Perez plans to meet with pro-life group Democrats for Life of America, amid an ongoing controversy within the party over whether and to what extent Democrats should pursue voters who oppose abortion. Democrats for Life advocates for pro-life Democrats and describes itself as “the pro-life voice of the Democratic Party.”

The meeting, which the DNC is setting up at the group’s request, is one of several conversations that Perez is having with pro-choice and pro-life Democrats, an aide to Perez confirmed to The Atlantic. As part of that outreach, Perez has spoken with Democratic elected officials and party leaders, and held a meeting earlier this month with women’s groups. The effort comes at a time when prominent Democrats are attempting to walk a fine line between affirming their party’s pro-choice platform and suggesting that there is room in the party for pro-life voters and candidates.

Perez had previously suggested that the Democratic Party should not “demand fealty” on every issue, including abortion. After NARAL’s criticism, however, the DNC Chair put out a statement widely viewed inside and outside the Democratic Party as a demand for unequivocal support for the party’s pro-choice platform.

“Every Democrat, like every American, should support a woman’s right to make her own choices about her body and her health,” the chair said. “That is not negotiable.” He added: “We must speak up for this principle as loudly as ever and with one voice.”

“The fundamentals of the race were a challenge to begin with, but the whole situation did a lot of damage,” the source close to the Mello campaign said, speaking on condition of anonymity. “The DNC chair shouldn’t be saying things that can be interpreted as a litmus test that will alienate people from the party.”

https://www.theatlantic.com/politic...ion-pro-life-pro-choice-tom-perez-dnc/526551/
 
It's not negotiable.

Don't like abortion? Don't have one.

That fucking simple.
 
Let them further marginalize their ideological core into distinct little goose stepping minority.
 
He's not actually threatening them with anything.

The Party is just telling them they along with white America aren't welcome in the Democrat Party unless they shut the fuck up and do as the minority says.:D
 
The Democrats' support has been steadily eroding for the past eight years so what do they do? Change strategies? Do something different to reverse the trend?

Nahhhh.

Please don't change anything.
 
The Party is just telling them they along with white America aren't welcome in the Democrat Party unless they shut the fuck up and do as the minority says.:D

The majority of Americans support safe and legal access to abortion. The only one minority holding this country hostage are the draconian religious idiots in the republican party that think they actually have half a damn clue.
 
The majority of Americans support safe and legal access to abortion. The only one minority holding this country hostage are the draconian religious idiots in the republican party that think they actually have half a damn clue.

Typically angry I see. The truth is Abortion has always been a no-win political issue with the country equally divided.

So, you really have to go back to the Coyote Cave and come up with a new "Acme" political ground game better than the one that has turned your party into a coastal archipelago that now holds sway in but 57 out of 3141 counties in the United States. That minority you speak of is holding both political branches of government and has played you out of over 1000 political offices nationwide.:rolleyes:
 
Typically angry I see. The truth is Abortion has always been a no-win political issue with the country equally divided.

So, you really have to go back to the Coyote Cave and come up with a new "Acme" political ground game better than the one that has turned your party into a coastal archipelago that now holds sway in but 57 out of 3141 counties in the United States. That minority you speak of is holding both political branches of government and has played you out of over 1000 political offices nationwide.:rolleyes:


Would you prefer if I told you to fuck off with or without a smile? :)

Idiot.

No. Safe and legal abortion is supported by the majority of the country. Whether they identify with pro-choice or pro-life is oddly where it gets sticky. Even then, the majority is still pro-choice.

Women's healthcare is not a political football and any woman with a brain is goddamned sick and tired of it being treated that way.

:) Less angry, you chauvinist prick? :)
 
Would you prefer if I told you to fuck off with or without a smile? :)

Idiot.

No. Safe and legal abortion is supported by the majority of the country. Whether they identify with pro-choice or pro-life is oddly where it gets sticky. Even then, the majority is still pro-choice.

Women's healthcare is not a political football and any woman with a brain is goddamned sick and tired of it being treated that way.



:) Less angry, you chauvinist prick? :)

It's still a no-win issue or more of you Dems would be in public office. Nobody is going to change Roe v Wade, despite its insult to Constitutional jurisprudence.

So sensitive, so angry. No need for hysterics. Call me whatever you want either with a smile or without. Unlike you, I'm not going to disrespect you in return.

What exactly have I said or done that earns the term "chauvinist?"
 
Would you prefer if I told you to fuck off with or without a smile? :)

Idiot.

No. Safe and legal abortion is supported by the majority of the country. Whether they identify with pro-choice or pro-life is oddly where it gets sticky. Even then, the majority is still pro-choice.

Women's healthcare is not a political football and any woman with a brain is goddamned sick and tired of it being treated that way.

:) Less angry, you chauvinist prick? :)

You're calling him angry?
 
It's still a no-win issue or more of you Dems would be in public office. Nobody is going to change Roe v Wade, despite its insult to Constitutional jurisprudence.

So sensitive, so angry. No need for hysterics. Call me whatever you want either with a smile or without. Unlike you, I'm not going to disrespect you in return.

What exactly have I said or done that earns the term "chauvinist?"

Gerrymandering you chauvinist twat.

You already do so what's it matter if you put it in words.

The only difference is I have the ovaries to be honest about it.

You're calling him angry?

Don't be an ignorant fool... oops too late.

I don't recall playing football with her health care. Lord knows a man couldn't get past the line of scrimmage with all that inherent hate and anger.:D

Of course. :rolleyes:

Because only men can be angry and if a woman doesn't smile her way through everything she's angry.

Fuck off. :)
 
Gerrymandering you chauvinist twat.

You already do so what's it matter if you put it in words.

The only difference is I have the ovaries to be honest about it.



Don't be an ignorant fool... oops too late.



Of course. :rolleyes:

Because only men can be angry and if a woman doesn't smile her way through everything she's angry.

Fuck off. :)

Please forgive these idiots. The only time women speak to them is when they are angry. They just assume all women are always angry.
 
Gerrymandering you chauvinist twat.

You already do so what's it matter if you put it in words.

The only difference is I have the ovaries to be honest about it.



Don't be an ignorant fool... oops too late.



Of course. :rolleyes:

Because only men can be angry and if a woman doesn't smile her way through everything she's angry.

Fuck off. :)

You want to see the art of gerrymandering come to The People's Republic of California.

You always make sure your ovaries are front and center, but they always seem to be in an uproar fighting there way up ideological hills only to slain ignominiously on their summits, but it is what it is.:)
 
Please forgive these idiots. The only time women speak to them is when they are angry. They just assume all women are always angry.

Yes you are correct.

I really should take that into consideration.

It is hard to differentiate if one has never heard the difference. Nuance is not their thing.
 
Yes you are correct.

I really should take that into consideration.

It is hard to differentiate if one has never heard the difference. Nuance is not their thing.

Under Rightguide's original name (vetteman) he claimed to have purchased young Vietnamese women for a can of corn or a fan. vetteman also liked to talk about scat and butt holes a little too much.
 
Under Rightguide's original name (vetteman) he claimed to have purchased young Vietnamese women for a can of corn or a fan. vetteman also liked to talk about scat and butt holes a little too much.

Well, I'm sure there still must be women in Vietnam who can be bought, buttholes and all; but the price is bound to be much higher nowadays than in wartime, and it is probably that which rankles him. Paying Thailand prices in Vietnam! :eek:
 
Under Rightguide's original name (vetteman) he claimed to have purchased young Vietnamese women for a can of corn or a fan. vetteman also liked to talk about scat and butt holes a little too much.


How utterly charming. :eek:
 
Typically angry I see. The truth is Abortion has always been a no-win political issue with the country equally divided.

So, you really have to go back to the Coyote Cave and come up with a new "Acme" political ground game better than the one that has turned your party into a coastal archipelago that now holds sway in but 57 out of 3141 counties in the United States. That minority you speak of is holding both political branches of government and has played you out of over 1000 political offices nationwide.:rolleyes:

Actually, that's not the truth at all. According to the Pew Research Center, public support of abortion in most or all cases currently sits at 57%. In an election, that's called a landslide. If you look closely at the data, it's even more telling. The American people do not want what many of their representatives in Congress are saying they do.
 
Are you up to date on what Perez and Sanders did to the pro-life Democrat candidate for mayor in Omaha?



The lunatics are in charge in the Democrat Party. They have no idea how to approach voters outside of their media bubble...
 
Actually, that's not the truth at all. According to the Pew Research Center, public support of abortion in most or all cases currently sits at 57%. In an election, that's called a landslide. If you look closely at the data, it's even more telling. The American people do not want what many of their representatives in Congress are saying they do.

Fake Data

Break it down by types of abortion...
 
Yes you are correct.

I really should take that into consideration.

It is hard to differentiate if one has never heard the difference. Nuance is not their thing.

Bullshit.

Nearly 50% of all students that I promoted to black belt were women.


Don't let politics make you look stupid and stop promoting the trolls...
 
Back
Top