How To Get To Heaven When You Die

DO YOU ACCEPT JESUS GIFT OF SALVATION BELIEVING HE DIED N ROSE AGAIN FOR YOUR SINS?

  • YES

    Votes: 48 16.4%
  • NO

    Votes: 148 50.5%
  • I ALREADY ACCEPTED JESUS GIFT OF SALVATION BEFORE

    Votes: 62 21.2%
  • OTHER

    Votes: 35 11.9%

  • Total voters
    293
Status
Not open for further replies.
To be honest, the Christian side wasn't that wacko. Some of the posters arguing made Eyer look as sweet as Winnie the Pooh!!

Once you look at the Christian side of the story, you find that it's actually the one that makes the most sense. It's just that we have been conditioned to believe contrary views from School, Media, ect.
 
Once you look at the Christian side of the story, you find that it's actually the one that makes the most sense. It's just that we have been conditioned to believe contrary views from School, Media, ect.

And people who go to church get conditioning there too.
 
The World Tennis Federation really doesn't have a say on who goes to heaven and who goes to hell. :confused::D Is John Macenroe the anti-Christ? Hmmm...https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/502221487269351425/07195s6C.jpeg

McEnroe was ok. His temper really wasn't any worse than lots of athletes. They got a lifetime of work invested into any given game or match so when something doesn't go their way and they think it should have they get pissed. And sometimes even when they know damn well the call was right.
 
McEnroe was ok. His temper really wasn't any worse than lots of athletes. They got a lifetime of work invested into any given game or match so when something doesn't go their way and they think it should have they get pissed. And sometimes even when they know damn well the call was right.

Those were the days I was on B team tennis. Woot! Lol Bests matches to watch were McEnroe / Borg. Good tennis

Christian Forums is a horrible place. It's impossible to have any real conversation there. Even harder than it is here.

That was my impression after just a short visit.
 
Evidence of evolution isn't only in fossils. It is also found in every living thing, from courses of development, bodily structures and patterns of behavior.

Do you mean like how animals understand music? How did that evolve in the wild? How did it evolve at all?

Evidence of Creation isn't only in fossils. It is also found in every living thing, from courses of development, bodily structures and patterns of behavior.
 
Do you mean like how animals understand music? How did that evolve in the wild? How did it evolve at all?

Evidence of Creation isn't only in fossils. It is also found in every living thing, from courses of development, bodily structures and patterns of behavior.
If so, the creation was a botch job with a hundred jerry-rigged solutions for every sensible one.
 
No one understands music, and few animals appear to appreciate it, and none of them can make it (no, birdsong is not music).

Music is put inside all creatures as a way of worshiping God. There is no way that it could have evolved, it has no survival benefit.

Birds don't just sing, they dance to modern music on beat. They understand that it is music and dance is an interpretation of that music. Evolution is false.

One example of many right here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RtbuToMsHLA

Here is another example:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cJOZp2ZftCw
 
Last edited:
Music is put inside all creatures as a way of worshiping God. There is no way that it could have evolved, it has no survival benefit.

The human ability to create music is a mystery of that kind, but does not apply to animals. They cannot create music. Some few species can appreciate it, that is all, and is in no way surprising.
 
The human ability to create music is a mystery of that kind, but does not apply to animals. They cannot create music. Some few species can appreciate it, that is all, and is in no way surprising.

Birds?
 

Again, no, birdsong is not music. Birdsong is instinctive, i.e., a product of the evolutionary process the existence of which frodobaggins denies. Esthetic judgments play no role in its production. Same with whalesong.
 
https://mic.com/articles/116300/sci...hy-music-is-so-important-to-humans#.iUCRkQeGP

Science May Have Finally Discovered Why Humans Make Music

Music's power comes from its ability to help human beings overcome cognitive dissonance, the feeling of emotional discomfort we feel when we learn novel information that contradicts existing beliefs. Numerous psychological studies show that the most common responses to this dissonance are to reject the new information or suppress the old. However, this has questionable evolutionary consequences, because it means we never learn the truth about what's bothering us.

Levitin and other researchers have also found music listening and playing can have a profound effect on social cohesion. It can functionally synchronize individuals' internal rhythms and promote feelings of group love through modulation of oxytocin. Evolutionarily, music may have played an important role in helping our ancestors establish cooperative societies, by helping them experience a sense of kinship with potential competitors.

Music may have a comparable evolutionary importance to language. By helping our ancestors connect with one another, strengthen their cognitive faculties and reduce cognitive dissonance, music faculties could have easily proved an extraordinarily beneficial evolutionary adaptation.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top