The Hearing Has Begun On The Hacks

Rightguide

Prof Triggernometry
Joined
Feb 7, 2017
Posts
67,303
My prediction:

Democrat invented charges of collusion between the Russians and the Trump Campaign will be proven false.

The Democrat lie that Russians gave data directly to Wikileaks will be proven false.

The claim that classified information can be published by the press without consequence because of an exception in the law will be proven false.
 
The Democrat side of this hearing is a reiteration of their talking points, knowing there's no evidence except their conspiracy theories. They make long winded statements disguised as questions they know Comey or Rogers cannot either comment on or confirm.
 
My prediction:

Democrat invented charges of collusion between the Russians and the Trump Campaign will be proven false.

The Democrat lie that Russians gave data directly to Wikileaks will be proven false.

The claim that classified information can be published by the press without consequence because of an exception in the law will be proven false.

The law already says you cant publish classified info or masked names. And all agreed the source hadda be one of 20 folks authorized to access the names and reports.

Prediction: Susan Rice is the fall guy.

Collusion? If it existed the info would be out there already. They got nuthin.

The leaks is the story. Someone called Valerie Jarrett who called Susan Rice with an order to leak.
 
My prediction:



The Democrat lie that Russians gave data directly to Wikileaks will be proven false.

ROFLMAO - Well this "prediction" was rendered moot in the opening statements and follow up comments of Comey and Rogers a few hours ago.

Definitively Russia fed Wikileaks.

Do you need a hug now?

more laughs: It was actually rendered moot in January in the ODNI report.
 
Last edited:
ROFLMAO - Well this "prediction" was rendered moot in the opening statements and follow up comments of Comey and Rogers a few hours ago.

Definitively Russia fed Wikileaks.

Do you need a hug now?

more laughs: It was actually rendered moot in January in the ODNI report.

No, in fact they proved they didn't have "direct" contact to Wikileaks, but allegedly passed the information through a third party. Which undermines a Democrat talking point that Wikileaks is a Russian operation. So, you may need a hug, but please look elsewhere for that hug.
 
No, in fact they proved they didn't have "direct" contact to Wikileaks, but allegedly passed the information through a third party. Which undermines a Democrat talking point that Wikileaks is a Russian operation. So, you may need a hug, but please look elsewhere for that hug.

Get help ! LOL
 
My prediction:

Democrat invented charges of collusion between the Russians and the Trump Campaign will be proven false.

The Democrat lie that Russians gave data directly to Wikileaks will be proven false.

The claim that classified information can be published by the press without consequence because of an exception in the law will be proven false.

Well, that ain't how it turned out.
 
Comey called Trump a liar in real time when this was read to him:

President Trump‏Verified account
@POTUS

The NSA and FBI tell Congress that Russia did not influence electoral process.
 
This one is just made up "The claim that classified information can be published by the press without consequence because of an exception in the law".

RightGuy is having a bad day too.
 
ROFLMAO - Well this "prediction" was rendered moot in the opening statements and follow up comments of Comey and Rogers a few hours ago.

Definitively Russia fed Wikileaks.

Do you need a hug now?

more laughs: It was actually rendered moot in January in the ODNI report.

Give me a quote or a cite to prove that Russia 'fed' Wikileaks.
 
This one is just made up "The claim that classified information can be published by the press without consequence because of an exception in the law".

RightGuy is having a bad day too.

Several pundits in the media have alluded to a First Amendment right of the press to publish classified information, as had other posters here have.
 
My prediction:

Democrat invented charges of collusion between the Russians and the Trump Campaign will be proven false.

The Democrat lie that Russians gave data directly to Wikileaks will be proven false.

The claim that classified information can be published by the press without consequence because of an exception in the law will be proven false.

Even though obviously the whole thing is completely made up garbage, there is nothing wrong with "colluding" with Russia anyway! What is the "crime"???

This is like back in the day when someone would be accused of being gay and had to prove they weren't gay. Today we say there's nothing wrong with it anyway, right. We need a Russophile Pride Parade past the Capitol in DC. Show our pride as proud patriotic Americans who want us to be friends and partners with the Russian Federation. Time Russophiles came out of the closet.

I am proud to be a patriotic pro-Russia American.
 
The Democrat side of this hearing is a reiteration of their talking points, knowing there's no evidence except their conspiracy theories. They make long winded statements disguised as questions they know Comey or Rogers cannot either comment on or confirm.
You mean like Trump's claim about Obama wire tapping him?

I love how so many people are more worried about leaks with no national security consequence than that are about Trump people keeping secret their meetings with representatives of a hostile nation and representing another country against the interests of the US. And lying about meeting them.

Not to mention Trump releasing classified information in a news interview.
“I just want people to know, the CIA was hacked, and a lot of things taken — that was during the Obama years. That was not during us," Trump said. "That was during the Obama situation. Mike Pompeo is there now doing a fantastic job."
 
Last edited:
The Clinton people tried to keep them secret too.

Many prominent Democrats claimed they would never, ever do such a thing and had to shut the fuck up when images were produced to prove they had. That people in his administration would meet with the Russian Ambassador bothers me not. That people in the government trusted to keep secrets would leak them to damage the duly elected President is of grave concern to anyone save those who just cannot accept the fact that the election they knew was in the back got itself out of the bag thanks to the lack of effort on the part of the old bag...
 
dont forget

the FBI went to the DUMZ and said we can help, you are being hacked

they rebuffed the FBI
 
here is a question

why is Trump et all being looked into

B Clinton gave a speech in Russia for $500k, and then his wife SOLD the uranium to them...Podesta was an agent for Russian interests, didnt register....why arent they under FBI scrutiny as well?

WE KNOW WHY

This is a warning to Trump, stop the DRAIN THE SWAMP SHIT or FACE IMPEACHMENT
 
dont forget

the FBI went to the DUMZ and said we can help, you are being hacked

they rebuffed the FBI

here is a question

why is Trump et all being looked into

B Clinton gave a speech in Russia for $500k, and then his wife SOLD the uranium to them...Podesta was an agent for Russian interests, didnt register....why arent they under FBI scrutiny as well?

WE KNOW WHY

This is a warning to Trump, stop the DRAIN THE SWAMP SHIT or FACE IMPEACHMENT

Besides, the Republicans had decent security. Hell, Podesta wasn't even hacked, he was phished. Clinton had her private server. These people just aren't tech savvy which is ironic since most all of the tech firms are dominated by bed-wetting leftwing red diaper doper babies who deposit huge bundles of cash into the campaigns of Democrats at all levels of government.
 
Even though obviously the whole thing is completely made up garbage, there is nothing wrong with "colluding" with Russia anyway! What is the "crime"???

This is like back in the day when someone would be accused of being gay and had to prove they weren't gay. Today we say there's nothing wrong with it anyway, right. We need a Russophile Pride Parade past the Capitol in DC. Show our pride as proud patriotic Americans who want us to be friends and partners with the Russian Federation. Time Russophiles came out of the closet.

I am proud to be a patriotic pro-Russia American.

Did you see how evasive Comey was when asked what would trigger a national security investigation of a private citizen visiting a foreign? One congressman pointed out that Bill Clinton, for instance, had many contacts in Russia and openly wondering if he would have been investigated.

One thing for sure, the Democrat claim that Russian collusion or cooperation with the Trump campaign corrupted the voting process and secured the election for Trump, was testified to as false by Comey and Rogers. So, the legal wind was removed from the major Democrat meme that Donald Trump is an illegitimate President. However, that won't stop Democrat hot air to the contrary, reality never does. They have betrayed their base and the American people with the propagation of this monstrous lie.
 
Besides, the Republicans had decent security. Hell, Podesta wasn't even hacked, he was phished. Clinton had her private server. These people just aren't tech savvy which is ironic since most all of the tech firms are dominated by bed-wetting leftwing red diaper doper babies who deposit huge bundles of cash into the campaigns of Democrats at all levels of government.

And at one point the FBI stated that Clinton's server was most likely hacked by at least five different foreign governments.
 
here is a question

why is Trump et all being looked into

B Clinton gave a speech in Russia for $500k, and then his wife SOLD the uranium to them...Podesta was an agent for Russian interests, didnt register....why arent they under FBI scrutiny as well?

WE KNOW WHY

This is a warning to Trump, stop the DRAIN THE SWAMP SHIT or FACE IMPEACHMENT

Rush Limbaugh made that point about impeachment by Republicans yesterday and said he would get into it more today.
 
Back
Top