Donna Brazile: 'I Sincerely Apologize' For DNC Emails

[Rightguide]

Well now there it is. After all of her denials to the contrary, she finally admits her corruption of duty that helped to defeat Bernie by propping up Hillary that in the end helped Trump. Remember she denied it with a straight face several times:

Donna Brazile: 'I sincerely apologize' for DNC emails

PHILADELPHIA — Democratic National Committee vice chair Donna Brazile apologized for the content of the internal DNC emails published online by Wikileaks.

More here:

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/donna-brazile-i-sincerely-apologize-for-dnc-emails/article/2597570

 

[EternalFantasies]

We don't care.

What's important is: who disclosed this!

 

[LincolnDuncan]

As if any of that matters in the face of this abortion of a presidency.

Are it righties still down with the clown?

Lit....the Lit righties.

I know the deplorables do. I'm wondering about those who consider themselves intelligent and Christian.

 

[EternalFantasies]

As if any of that matters in the face of this abortion of a presidency.

Are it righties still down with the clown?

Thread on stew. Coming up soon.

 

[BotanyBoy]

Well now there it is. After all of her denials to the contrary, she finally admits her corruption of duty that helped to defeat Bernie by propping up Hillary that in the end helped Trump. Remember she denied it with a straight face several times:

Donna Brazile: 'I sincerely apologize' for DNC emails

PHILADELPHIA — Democratic National Committee vice chair Donna Brazile apologized for the content of the internal DNC emails published online by Wikileaks.

More here:

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/donna-brazile-i-sincerely-apologize-for-dnc-emails/article/2597570

Democraps don't give a fuck....the only reason they are upset is that despite all the cheating their sack of shit lost.

They just hope the next folks cheat more, because shit bags.

 

[Disgustipated]

Did you miss the interview she did this week with Trevor Noah?

 

[adrina]

Emails? Questions at debates? I'm supposed to give two flying figs about something like this when we've been witness to insane amounts of corruption, pay to play, email hypocrisy, utter and complete buffoonery and on down the line and it's only been since Jan20th...!

You've got to be kidding me.

We really need that face palm smiley.

 

[Colonel Hogan]

As if any of that matters in the face of this abortion of a presidency.

Are it righties still down with the clown?

Lit....the Lit righties.

I know the deplorables do. I'm wondering about those who consider themselves intelligent and Christian.

No, most of us think he's pretty much of a clown, too. He is going to continue to make up shit and basically behave in a fashion that should embarrass him and will invariably embarrass the United States for much of the next few years.

But here's the thing. He is already well on the way to forging stronger policies on illegal immigration, actually fighting and defeating militant Islamic jihadists without apology, and has nominated a thoroughly qualified individual that will hopefully retain a judicially conservative philosophy on the Supreme Court.

Those three steps alone make all the pain of his absurd public persona worthwhile. I'd much prefer he had a pleasing personality, but it ain't like PantSuits wasn't the lead character in the modern day Taming of the Shrew.

So you lose BIGLY and those of us on this side, at the worst, lose "halfly." We're good, thanks.

Whine on.

 

[Disgustipated]

No, most of us think he's pretty much of a clown, too. He is going to continue to make up shit and basically behave in a fashion that should embarrass him and will invariably embarrass the United States for much of the next few years.

But here's the thing. He is already well on the way to forging stronger policies on illegal immigration, actually fighting and defeating militant Islamic jihadists without apology, and has nominated a thoroughly qualified individual that will hopefully retain a judicially conservative philosophy on the Supreme Court.

Those three steps alone make all the pain of his absurd public persona worthwhile. I'd much prefer he had a pleasing personality, but it ain't like PantSuits wasn't the lead character in the modern day Taming of the Shrew.

So you lose BIGLY and those of us on this side, at the worst, lose "halfly." We're good, thanks.

Whine on.

Please spare the cheerleading bullshit. If Obama did any of this you clowns would have called him a war monger even more than you already did. Yes making America the joke of the world is precisely the image we need. Dafuq happened to you? Only vettebirther had a bigger mental break on the Lit.

 

[Colonel Hogan]

Please spare the cheerleading bullshit. If Obama did any of this you clowns would have called him a war monger even more than you already did. Yes making America the joke of the world is precisely the image we need. Dafuq happened to you? Only vettebirther had a bigger mental break on the Lit.

Obama deported more illegal aliens than any President in history, if I am not mistaken. I had no problems with that whatsoever.

Obama disingenuously equated shoving detained terrorists against a wall with "torture" rolleyes, but then simply opted to KILL more terrorists with bombs from drones than to waste resources capturing them. As much as I might have disagreed with the former position, the latter decision was probably the better option. I had no problem with that whatsoever.

It was Obama who "violated" Pakistan's airspace with Seal Team Six and put a round between OBL's headlights. It was the single best act of his entire Presidency. I will be forever grateful.

Do you object to that cheerleading?

 

[LincolnDuncan]

No, most of us think he's pretty much of a clown, too. He is going to continue to make up shit and basically behave in a fashion that should embarrass him and will invariably embarrass the United States for much of the next few years.

But here's the thing. He is already well on the way to forging stronger policies on illegal immigration, actually fighting and defeating militant Islamic jihadists without apology, and has nominated a thoroughly qualified individual that will hopefully retain a judicially conservative philosophy on the Supreme Court.

Those three steps alone make all the pain of his absurd public persona worthwhile. I'd much prefer he had a pleasing personality, but it ain't like PantSuits wasn't the lead character in the modern day Taming of the Shrew.

So you lose BIGLY and those of us on this side, at the worst, lose "halfly." We're good, thanks.

Whine on.

O.K., there are many issues we can discuss. My concerns go beyond Trump so let’s try and stay on one topic.

Of course, I can’t provide you with proof, but I think the evidence is overwhelming of collusion between Trump and his administration with Russia. When I say Russia, I mean the government and private Russian citizens. I think that it’s obvious that Russia is corrupt up to their eyeballs. Putin and his allies within Russia are the equivalent of mafia dons on a grand scale. Trump, the international business man and all around scumbag, was aware of their lawlessness and the easy money in Russia. I think that he is a person with no morals and greedy as sin, who can, in his own mind justify selling out American interests. That concerns me. Why am I wrong? Why am I wrong to think that his budget cuts, to allegedly grow the military are nothing more than him taking care of the Military Industrial Complex?
I understand that you have legitimate reasons for being pleased that he is addressing immigration and that you will get a supreme that reflects your own political philosophy. The ISIS issue is too broad. But my question to you is, is all that he and Bannon are doing worth it to you? Did you vote for the Bannon right wing extreme with designs to destroy American institutions?

I object to the whining comment. I consider myself a patriotic American. Democracy in my country takes place 365 days a year. This is the battle for hearts and minds.

 

[Disgustipated]

Obama deported more illegal aliens than any President in history, if I am not mistaken. I had no problems with that whatsoever.

Obama disingenuously equated shoving detained terrorists against a wall with "torture" rolleyes, but then simply opted to KILL more terrorists with bombs from drones than to waste resources capturing them. As much as I might have disagreed with the former position, the latter decision was probably the better option. I had no problem with that whatsoever.

It was Obama who "violated" Pakistan's airspace with Seal Team Six and put a round between OBL's headlights. It was the single best act of his entire Presidency. I will be forever grateful.

Do you object to that cheerleading?

No, but I wasn't talking about you cheerleading for Obama, was I? You being a former law enthusiast and proud(?) American, one would think you would remove your head from #45's rectum long enough to see through his bullshit but you "think" rolleyes he's doing a bang-up job.

Ready for some real death panels, geezer?

 

[Colonel Hogan]

O.K., there are many issues we can discuss. My concerns go beyond Trump so let’s try and stay on one topic.

Of course, I can’t provide you with proof, but I think the evidence is overwhelming of collusion between Trump and his administration with Russia. When I say Russia, I mean the government and private Russian citizens. I think that it’s obvious that Russia is corrupt up to their eyeballs. Putin and his allies within Russia are the equivalent of mafia dons on a grand scale. Trump, the international business man and all around scumbag, was aware of their lawlessness and the easy money in Russia. I think that he is a person with no morals and greedy as sin, who can, in his own mind justify selling out American interests. That concerns me. Why am I wrong? Why am I wrong to think that his budget cuts, to allegedly grow the military are nothing more than him taking care of the Military Industrial Complex?
I understand that you have legitimate reasons for being pleased that he is addressing immigration and that you will get a supreme that reflects your own political philosophy. The ISIS issue is too broad. But my question to you is, is all that he and Bannon are doing worth it to you? Did you vote for the Bannon right wing extreme with designs to destroy American institutions?

I object to the whining comment. I consider myself a patriotic American. Democracy in my country takes place 365 days a year. This is the battle for hearts and minds.

The short answer is that ultimately, yes, given the two choices available back in November. But for the record, Banon is my second least favorite aspect of this administration, just behind Trump's general schmuckery. But I do not view Trump as "corrupt" as you do, nor do I believe he colluded with the Russians to influence the election. Hillary lost because of the pent up anger on the right and because she took electoral votes in Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania for granted. It really is ALL on her ass.

As for "whining," I didn't really mean that as disparaging as it probably sounded. More accurately that you obviously have twice as much to be unhappy about (or more) than I do. That's all.

 

[Christobal]

O.K., there are many issues we can discuss. My concerns go beyond Trump so let’s try and stay on one topic.

Of course, I can’t provide you with proof

You probably should have stopped right there.

 

[Christobal]

"Those words do not reflect the spirit of this party, this party of Franklin Roosevelt, this party of justice and peace and Lyndon Johnson, this party that made sure that I had a head start ... this is not the party that would write emails like that."

Sorry Donna but this is the party that wrote emails exactly like this.

 

[LincolnDuncan]

The short answer is that ultimately, yes, given the two choices available back in November. But for the record, Banon is my second least favorite aspect of this administration, just behind Trump's general schmuckery. But I do not view Trump as "corrupt" as you do, nor do I believe he colluded with the Russians to influence the election. Hillary lost because of the pent up anger on the right and because she took electoral votes in Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania for granted. It really is ALL on her ass.

As for "whining," I didn't really mean that as disparaging as it probably sounded. More accurately that you obviously have twice as much to be unhappy about (or more) than I do. That's all.

I appreciate your response. I'm sure we could go a couple more rounds. I'm going to check back in a month or so. I'm not giving up on you yet.

 

[OldJourno]

O.K., there are many issues we can discuss. My concerns go beyond Trump so let’s try and stay on one topic.

Of course, I can’t provide you with proof, but I think the evidence is overwhelming of collusion between Trump and his administration with Russia. When I say Russia, I mean the government and private Russian citizens. I think that it’s obvious that Russia is corrupt up to their eyeballs. Putin and his allies within Russia are the equivalent of mafia dons on a grand scale. Trump, the international business man and all around scumbag, was aware of their lawlessness and the easy money in Russia. I think that he is a person with no morals and greedy as sin, who can, in his own mind justify selling out American interests. That concerns me. Why am I wrong? Why am I wrong to think that his budget cuts, to allegedly grow the military are nothing more than him taking care of the Military Industrial Complex?
I understand that you have legitimate reasons for being pleased that he is addressing immigration and that you will get a supreme that reflects your own political philosophy. The ISIS issue is too broad. But my question to you is, is all that he and Bannon are doing worth it to you? Did you vote for the Bannon right wing extreme with designs to destroy American institutions?

I object to the whining comment. I consider myself a patriotic American. Democracy in my country takes place 365 days a year. This is the battle for hearts and minds.

There is NO evidence of collusion. But pretend there was. In what state did it make a difference and how?

 

[sr71plt]

No, but I wasn't talking about you cheerleading for Obama, was I? You being a former law enthusiast and proud(?) American, one would think you would remove your head from #45's rectum long enough to see through his bullshit but you "think" rolleyes he's doing a bang-up job.

Ready for some real death panels, geezer?

Yeah, you'd think that anyone with half a brain would have totally given up on Trump by now. Just within the last twenty-four hours he's managed to grossly insult two of our major allies (UK and Germany). And someone should grab his smart phone out of his hands and jam it up his ass.

On Donna Brazil--yes, she screwed her reputation royally. I would have preferred that, in the wake of the DNC e-mail hackings, they just were honest and said of course they were working for Hillary and not Bernie. Bernie didn't become a Democrat until ten minutes before he wanted to steal the party's support apparatus (he never did change his Independent classification in the U.S. Senate), and he'd never done a damn thing for the DNC in their function of promoting Democrats in across-the-board races. Hillary Clinton had worked diligently for the party for two decades. I would have just admitted that, yes, the DNC staff was preferring Clinton. Of the two, she was the only working Democrat.

The RNC was doing the exact same thing in trying to stave off another nonparty candidate trying to steal their nomination--Donald Trump. They just didn't manage to do it and they weren't having the Russian hacking their communications, which, if hacked and published, would have shown the same internal RNC preferences for certain candidates--naturally so--as the DNC e-mails showed.

Brazil's sin was in lying about it.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

We don't care.

What's important is: who disclosed this!

Russians! We can see them from our driveway!

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Obama deported more illegal aliens than any President in history, if I am not mistaken. I had no problems with that whatsoever.

Obama disingenuously equated shoving detained terrorists against a wall with "torture" rolleyes, but then simply opted to KILL more terrorists with bombs from drones than to waste resources capturing them. As much as I might have disagreed with the former position, the latter decision was probably the better option. I had no problem with that whatsoever.

It was Obama who "violated" Pakistan's airspace with Seal Team Six and put a round between OBL's headlights. It was the single best act of his entire Presidency. I will be forever grateful.

Do you object to that cheerleading?

After a rules change that allowed them to count people turned away at the border...

 

[EternalFantasies]

Obama deported more illegal aliens than any President in history, if I am not mistaken. I had no problems with that whatsoever.

Obama disingenuously equated shoving detained terrorists against a wall with "torture" rolleyes, but then simply opted to KILL more terrorists with bombs from drones than to waste resources capturing them. As much as I might have disagreed with the former position, the latter decision was probably the better option. I had no problem with that whatsoever.

It was Obama who "violated" Pakistan's airspace with Seal Team Six and put a round between OBL's headlights. It was the single best act of his entire Presidency. I will be forever grateful.

Do you object to that cheerleading?

I wonder if anyone had ever asked the question: Why was Obama given a Nobel peace prize and what extraordinary effort had he done in a few months as President.

Albeit, Its got a tricky answer.

 

[NOIRTRASH]

As if any of that matters in the face of this abortion of a presidency.

Are it righties still down with the clown?

Lit....the Lit righties.

I know the deplorables do. I'm wondering about those who consider themselves intelligent and Christian.

Yo Cupcake, do this: Hold your breath and pout till 2020.

 

[NOIRTRASH]

No one has a problem with the Brits spying on Trump for Obama.

Obama gets a pass for spying on Merkel.

 

[Ishmael]

After a rules change that allowed them to count people turned away at the border...

Some additional points. Obama benefited from the congressionally authorized build up of ICE and the Border Patrol that started in the 2006 fiscal year. The year after his re-election in 2012 he essentially tied the hands of both ICE and the Border Patrol allowing thousands to enter the country. Hell, he even facilitated their relocation (dispersion) throughout the nation.

Those early numbers based on a 'new' math sort of statistical counting method hides what was actually taking place. Strip away the 'turned away at the border' numbers and then compare the resultant figure to the numbers he allowed in and the picture changes dramatically.

Ishmael

 

[EternalFantasies]

Some additional points. Obama benefited from the congressionally authorized build up of ICE and the Border Patrol that started in the 2006 fiscal year. The year after his re-election in 2012 he essentially tied the hands of both ICE and the Border Patrol allowing thousands to enter the country. Hell, he even facilitated their relocation (dispersion) throughout the nation.

Those early numbers based on a 'new' math sort of statistical counting method hides what was actually taking place. Strip away the 'turned away at the border' numbers and then compare the resultant figure to the numbers he allowed in and the picture changes dramatically.

Ishmael

You forgot the 'Dreamers' program; although, the leftist in me likes that program.