For The GB Record

[irksomesauce]

Just so it's fully transparent and there can be no lying or mistake about it at all this time...

I've just reported this post:

http://forum.literotica.com/showpost.php?p=83724805&postcount=83

...with the message: "Let the record show this post is what's intentionally started the underage insinuation shit again."

Now, I fully expect the usual progressive pieces of shit to begin chiming in with their own Forum Guideline-violating insinuations...

Let's all see how far the progressive owner of this site allows her progressive pals to go this time, shall we?

 

[Lancecastor]

District 9 !

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/d/d7/District_nine_ver2.jpg

 

[Queertag45]

Just so it's fully transparent and there can be no lying or mistake about it at all this time...

I've just reported this post:

http://forum.literotica.com/showpost.php?p=83724805&postcount=83

...with the message: "Let the record show this post is what's intentionally started the underage insinuation shit again."

Now, I fully expect the usual progressive pieces of shit to begin chiming in with their own Forum Guideline-violating insinuations...

Let's all see how far the progressive owner of this site allows her progressive pals to go this time, shall we?

*reported*

Its against forum rules to share the contents of messages sent in private.

 

[BoyNextDoor]

Looks photoshopped to me.

 

[Emerson40]

Just so it's fully transparent and there can be no lying or mistake about it at all this time...

I've just reported this post:

http://forum.literotica.com/showpost.php?p=83724805&postcount=83

...with the message: "Let the record show this post is what's intentionally started the underage insinuation shit again."

Now, I fully expect the usual progressive pieces of shit to begin chiming in with their own Forum Guideline-violating insinuations...

Let's all see how far the progressive owner of this site allows her progressive pals to go this time, shall we?

I can't seem to open the link provided.

Could you be a doll, and repost that as a PDF File?


http://jhsf.org/images/icon-PDF-document.png

 

[Queertag45]

What part of that was report able?

 

[VaticanAssassin]

.......

 

[KingOrfeo]

No, I don't think a cartoon of Trump as a naked baby is any violation of board rules.

 

[Ms_Ann]

I had a post deleted for mentioning boysenberry pie. Who knew it was so controversial.

 

[irksomesauce]

http://forum.literotica.com/showpost.php?p=83739909&postcount=3731

2. You may not post...This includes discussions and/or accusations involving pedophilia and/or child sex abuse.

Yesterday it began anew by a progressive, and was reported so that GB record would clearly, unarguably, and objectively reflect that fact of the matter. Today it's continued by a progressive, and that fact of the matter is now also clearly, unarguably, and objectively entered into the GB record.

Why does the progressive owner of this website allow progressive posters to once more bring up their underage stuff in direct violation of her own Forum Guidelines?

Why are progressives still allowed to post the exact type of posts others have been censored and banned for?

 

[pointless]

meh, never mind.

 

[Sean]

http://forum.literotica.com/showpost.php?p=83739909&postcount=3731



Yesterday it began anew by a progressive, and was reported so that GB record would clearly, unarguably, and objectively reflect that fact of the matter. Today it's continued by a progressive, and that fact of the matter is now also clearly, unarguably, and objectively entered into the GB record.

Why does the progressive owner of this website allow progressive posters to once more bring up their underage stuff in direct violation of her own Forum Guidelines?

Why are progressives still allowed to post the exact type of posts others have been censored and banned for?

You mean you weren't repeatedly banned because you kept posting about paedophilia?

 

[irksomesauce]

http://forum.literotica.com/showpost.php?p=83740609&postcount=12

2. You may not post... This includes discussions and/or accusations involving pedophilia and/or child sex abuse.

Again, let the GB record show a progressive started this back up AGAIN yesterday, and now a progressive has made his second post today in direct violation of Forum Guideline #2.

This stuff has happened many times before, and over a dozen usernames I've created have been banned instantly when I've simply quoted verbatim the like-wise accusing words of posters who were never censored or banned for posting their own words themselves.

Isn't is weird how progressives are allowed to post Forum Guideline violation words to others, but even when their words are simply quoted verbatim, the quoter is instantly banned while the violating posts are left up for all to read and the violating poster is allowed to continue posting?

Ahhhhh, memories...

I remember when I was first banned on this Board: for simply first quoting and linking to, and then only linking to, what another poster had posted proudly herself.

You remember that, don't you, punk bitch?

Remember when you even told butters to totally fuck off because you couldn't remain even posting friends with anyone who supported the person whose verbatim words I simply linked to? A matter of PRINCIPLE you needed to so proudly make a point of...

But then another progressive poster here - who supported that person as much as butters did/does - started having some sort of affect on your PROUD PRINCIPLE, to the point where you totally caved and are now progressive suck buddies with socialist piece of shit butters again.

Punk bitch loves hypocritical chunky creampie much more than any principle(s) he was never man enough to stand up for in the first place, eh cuck?

And here you are posting again in direct violation of Forum Guideline #2, and the socialist owner of this site will allow you and other progressives to keep posting what she's banned others for.

Wow, big surprise that you enjoy swallowing that progressive hypocrisy shit just as easily as you sucked your PRINCIPLE shit down. Good that there's just as unprincipled, socialist twatbuckets around for fem boys like you to feed from.

 

[KingOrfeo]

No, I don't think a cartoon of Trump as a naked baby is any violation of board rules.

Certainly it is no encouragement of pedophilia; he is not drawn to look like anything anyone would conceivably want to fuck. He is drawn to look like Donald Trump, the ugliest POTUS since Lincoln.

 

[irksomesauce]

Huh, imagine that:

The very same progressive, with the very same intentional underage insinuating retort, within the very same week...

http://forum.literotica.com/showpost.php?p=83846005&postcount=4278

...and the progressive owner of this website - who uses underage insinuations herself to retortfully fling - does absolutely nothing AGAIN, even as her own Forum Guidelines prohibit it.

 

[KingOrfeo]

irk, the voice in your head telling you to post these things is not really God's. It is actually the voice of Son of Sam's dog. Don't do everything it tells you.

 

[Emerson40]

http://68.media.tumblr.com/08231f00467613fe1915c2730a1e753d/tumblr_of7xkiI6NS1txeruoo1_500.gif

 

[EllieTalbot]

meh, never mind.

A man after my own heart.

Apathetic in Appalachia,
Ellie

 

[queertag46]

Huh, imagine that:

The very same progressive, with the very same intentional underage insinuating retort, within the very same week...

http://forum.literotica.com/showpost.php?p=83846005&postcount=4278

...and the progressive owner of this website - who uses underage insinuations herself to retortfully fling - does absolutely nothing AGAIN, even as her own Forum Guidelines prohibit it.

Maybe if you whine like a little bitch some more somebody might give a shit? The GB record is skipping...

 

[Disgustipated]

Just so it's fully transparent and there can be no lying or mistake about it at all this time...

I've just reported this post:

http://forum.literotica.com/showpost.php?p=83724805&postcount=83
http://i.imgur.com/xIU19NI.jpg?1

...with the message: "Let the record show this post is what's intentionally started the underage insinuation shit again."

Now, I fully expect the usual progressive pieces of shit to begin chiming in with their own Forum Guideline-violating insinuations...

Let's all see how far the progressive owner of this site allows her progressive pals to go this time, shall we?

Huh, imagine that:

The very same progressive, with the very same intentional underage insinuating retort, within the very same week...

http://forum.literotica.com/showpost.php?p=83846005&postcount=4278
http://i.imgur.com/xIU19NI.jpg?1

...and the progressive owner of this website - who uses underage insinuations herself to retortfully fling - does absolutely nothing AGAIN, even as her own Forum Guidelines prohibit it.

FYPYW

http://68.media.tumblr.com/08231f00467613fe1915c2730a1e753d/tumblr_of7xkiI6NS1txeruoo1_500.gif

​

 

[irksomesauce]

Maybe if you whine like a little bitch some more somebody might give a shit? The GB record is skipping...

It's nothing unlike the Recidiva deal, really...

That drum was banged so righteously and precisely often that, eventually, just three key words would bring her up in all 10 organic spots on page 1 of a Google search.

Documenting endless violations like those in this thread has likewise proven totally effective in driving the point home to virtually the entire regular populace of the GB: the progressive website owner is now so renowned for being totally partisan about not enforcing her own Forum Guidelines, that the very, very best even her most loyal partisan boot lappers can offer is: ffs, you fuckers, it's her website and she can do what she wants. DAMMIT! (parapharsing seaniepoo's gash, of course).

Being a progressive veteran of totally fabricating underage insinuations herself, it really does plainly explain why she continues to allow others in her progressive tribe to do exactly the same, just as long as they keep it in their very own, progressive underage style.

 

[Emerson40]

It's nothing unlike the Recidiva deal, really...

That drum was banged so righteously and precisely often that, eventually, just three key words would bring her up in all 10 organic spots on page 1 of a Google search.

Documenting endless violations like those in this thread has likewise proven totally effective in driving the point home to virtually the entire regular populace of the GB: the progressive website owner is now so renowned for being totally partisan about not enforcing her own Forum Guidelines, that the very, very best even her most loyal partisan boot lappers can offer is: ffs, you fuckers, it's her website and she can do what she wants. DAMMIT! (parapharsing seaniepoo's gash, of course).

Being a progressive veteran of totally fabricating underage insinuations herself, it really does plainly explain why she continues to allow others in her progressive tribe to do exactly the same, just as long as they keep it in their very own, progressive underage style.

Adobe products can be very handy, for all your documenting needs.

http://tothepc.com/pic/pdf-unlock-online-tools.png

 

[queertag46]

It's nothing unlike the Recidiva deal, really...

That drum was banged so righteously and precisely often that, eventually, just three key words would bring her up in all 10 organic spots on page 1 of a Google search.

Documenting endless violations like those in this thread has likewise proven totally effective in driving the point home to virtually the entire regular populace of the GB: the progressive website owner is now so renowned for being totally partisan about not enforcing her own Forum Guidelines, that the very, very best even her most loyal partisan boot lappers can offer is: ffs, you fuckers, it's her website and she can do what she wants. DAMMIT! (parapharsing seaniepoo's gash, of course).

Being a progressive veteran of totally fabricating underage insinuations herself, it really does plainly explain why she continues to allow others in her progressive tribe to do exactly the same, just as long as they keep it in their very own, progressive underage style.

So you got Laurel all figured out, want a lollipop?

 

[Ms_Ann]

So you got Laurel all figured out, want a lollipop?

http://www.seo21.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/google-link-spam-1400x600.jpg

 

[irksomesauce]

So you got Laurel all figured out, want a lollipop?

Projection, wannabe, nothing but pure projection.