What right wing stupidity should we talk about today?

[irksomesauce]

Yesterday the socialist Blurt Bitches were whining about all the political posts on the GB...

...today, they're out pimping their hypocritical bullshit exactly like the worst of whom they love to whine so much about.

Perfect.

 

[Emerson40]

Perfect.

http://68.media.tumblr.com/eeab3edb47235ca0df132844c9e8e17d/tumblr_ol4rocQZ271v9yl1ko1_500.png


http://68.media.tumblr.com/2d9a8f0aa9b5d5949e680cb1e42093eb/tumblr_ol4ud3ikpm1qbjzkho1_500.jpg


http://24.media.tumblr.com/3fd134d1e4bacf137f4fc98d2447ed7a/tumblr_mxv0c5MalT1qcla63o1_500.gif

 

[Christobal]

As previously posted, this smelled supreme court all over it.

It seems something's getting determined once and for all.

Coz the ban doesn't make sense anyway. Obama did a better job. If Trump was serious about this ban the way he imposed it, he'd have put a ban on all nationalities having visited those countries, and required to know why the person was there.

Are you trying to get logical? That's not allowed here. We just hate something. Over and over again with no thought required.

 

[irksomesauce]

Blurt Bitches championing their "right" to cold-bloodedly murder their own kids, whyever would they give a socialist shit about teaching their femprog runts they did allow to live how to count?

https://imghaven.files.wordpress.com/2017/02/hillary-0-2.jpg

Whereas the 9th proudly boasts of a 80% reversal rate before the Supremes, Hillary can boast of a "Perfect", 100% rejection rate before the People.

 

[Greypowerful]

I couldn't possibly disagree more. Again, I didn't vote for her in the primary and honestly can't stand her and I still think she would have been a vastly superior president than the ignorant, dangerous, man-baby currently in that office

Sorry, perhaps I wasn't clear. There's no question in most folks' minds that "technically " she would've been a better POTUS.

My point was that the DNC, by backing HRC. is partly responsible for the Chump's win.

 

[zipman]

Sorry, perhaps I wasn't clear. There's no question in most folks' minds that "technically " she would've been a better POTUS.

My point was that the DNC, by backing HRC. is partly responsible for the Chump's win.

Ah, I didn't get that from your post.

That statement I agree with.

 

[Greypowerful]

Ah, I didn't get that from your post.

That statement I agree with.

iPhone keyboards promote poor logic, in OLD people's composition?

 

[Emerson40]

I long to feel the sweet caress of the Child Boss' ban hammer.
I'm swingin' my sac here, two withered dates in an old yarn sock, and gnobody gives a fvck.

Why has the renter of this anti-free speech bodega forsaken me?

Wait until the wannabe socialist baby killers and blurt bitchboys feel my wrath, when my army of (no)one is released on these boards.

http://www.sherv.net/cm/emo/laughing/roflmao.gif

It might even be mildly irritating for some. You have been warned.

http://68.media.tumblr.com/74ebebe9c95a973454c8b8beb5c429d3/tumblr_ol4d54s75A1snm7t3o1_500.jpg

 

[BoyNextDoor]

Well, we could talk about the Liar in Chief telling another whopper when it comes to crime statistics which are NOT at their highest in 40 years.

We could talk about Sessions repeating that lie today.

But the RWCJ doesn't seem to care about lying anymore.


We could talk about the blatant sexism in the senate as demonstrated by Mitch McConnell. America's favorite talking turtle. That was truly a shameful action.

We could talk about Trump tweeting during a security briefing from his POTUS account about his daughter's clothing line and how unfairly she is being treated. I mean, there's nothing more important going on right now.

OR we could talk about Kelly Anne Conway breaking the law by actively promoting Ivanka's brand. Again, conflicts of interest don't seem to matter now.

And this was all over a two day period. Holy fuck are they a corrupt and incompetent group.

I believe that the national security adviser, Michael Flynn, speaking about sanctions with the Russian ambassador before the inauguration is a biggie. This guy is going to lose his job.

 

[irksomesauce]

Ah, yes: nutless femprog boys always start it off the very same way, with Forum Guideline-violating insinuation and with total disregard of how the progressive owner of this site feels about doing so:

I say, over and over, that I don't want underage sexuality in the site.

So you all start a thread full of songs celebrating sex with underage girls, and pictures of half-naked underage girls - the combination and context of which, as posted on an adult erotica site, is not cool at all.

That's not some song lyrics or a record cover here or there on a relevant thread.

That's creepy and weird, and not wanted here.

This is all becoming very very tedious.

http://forum.literotica.com/showpost.php?p=74462848&postcount=3502

Posting on the Gee Bee has always been a fun distraction for me. It's slowly devolved into a non-fun distraction. So you'll be pleased to know that I'm not going to do it anymore. Best of luck in all you do, and please save your cheers of joy for when I've left the room.

http://forum.literotica.com/showpost.php?p=74463912&postcount=3535

Let's see if you have the nads to carry your underage shit further, Blurt Bitch boy.

 

[BoyNextDoor]

Sorry, perhaps I wasn't clear. There's no question in most folks' minds that "technically " she would've been a better POTUS.

My point was that the DNC, by backing HRC. is partly responsible for the Chump's win.

Affirmative - 100%. I had to listen to all manner of "Bernie just can't win" from the establishment Democrats. And there was no amount of logic that they would listen to about this not being the year for an insider, especially one as damaged and unlikeable and HRC.

To find out that Wasserman had wired up the DNC for her was not a surprise, not in the least bit. It was palpable and obvious.

 

[KingOrfeo]

Ah, yes: nutless femprog boys always start it off the very same way, with Forum Guideline-violating insinuation and with total disregard of how the progressive owner of this site feels about doing so:





Let's see if you have the nads to carry your underage shit further, Blurt Bitch boy.

What on Earth are you talking about?

 

[Disgustipated]

They pretend they are not subservient to the cellophane Don while spewing lies they can never back up. So, same as usual.

 

[VaticanAssassin]

They pretend they are not subservient to the cellophane Don while spewing lies they can never back up. So, same as usual.

Maybe you should go beg laurel to have them stop. Sure you can make up a good lie. It's not you like you haven't already lied to her and wasted her time with your pansy ass bitch games.

Damn, man. I get it. You are hurting. But don't take it out on Laurel....

 

[LincolnDuncan]

Ah, yes: nutless femprog boys always start it off the very same way, with Forum Guideline-violating insinuation and with total disregard of how the progressive owner of this site feels about doing so:





Let's see if you have the nads to carry your underage shit further, Blurt Bitch boy.

what is the meaning of femprog?

 

[KingOrfeo]

what is the meaning of femprog?

I think it means "feminist-progressive."

 

[Hard_Rom]

I think it means "feminist-progressive."

Anti-feminist xenophobic speak similar to what the Quebec mosque killer used online. I'm betting anti-feminist xenophobic language has entered the lexicon the NSA and CSE searches the web for.

 

[magicalmoments]

We could talk about Trump tweeting during a security briefing from his POTUS account about his daughter's clothing line and how unfairly she is being treated. I mean, there's nothing more important going on right now.
.

Does anyone know where this Trump woman gets her fashion line manufactured?

 

[LincolnDuncan]

I think it means "feminist-progressive."

I think that the deplorables are developing their own language.

But developing is not the right word.

 

[domroger]

Does anyone know where this Trump woman gets her fashion line manufactured?

Like her father's latest hotel ,China allegedly .

 

[sr71plt]

B

Whereas the 9th proudly boasts of a 80% reversal rate before the Supremes, Hillary can boast of a "Perfect", 100% rejection rate before the People.

Well, no. She won the vote of the people--by lots. The rejection was from the skewed Electoral College.

Would be interesting to see how the vote would be in a revote now that Trump's dupes/dopes have realized they screwed up on health insurance by not checking on what Obamacare actually meant for them.

 

[sr71plt]

Does anyone know where this Trump woman gets her fashion line manufactured?

It was only mentioned about 300 times during the campaign. You weren't listening?

The same with Trump's ties. He was raked over the coals on the "Dave Letterman" show, for God sake, and the clip of that was shown on social media every which way.

Were people just sticking their fingers in their ears and going la-la-la for a year?

 

[magicalmoments]

It was only mentioned about 300 times during the campaign. You weren't listening?

The same with Trump's ties. He was raked over the coals on the "Dave Letterman" show, for God sake, and the clip of that was shown on social media every which way.

Were people just sticking their fingers in their ears and going la-la-la for a year?

Hey dickhead. I live in a foreign country, USA news only makes the airwaves here when a disaster happens, like kids being killed in school shootings, we seem to get a lot of those, or all those terrorist attacks by homegrown terrorists, or when you've invaded another country to track down weapons of mass destruction, or you elect a lunatic as a head of state. We just don't get all the mundane stuff.

 

[sr71plt]

Hey dickhead. I live in a foreign country, USA news only makes the airwaves here when a disaster happens, like kids being killed in school shootings, we seem to get a lot of those, or all those terrorist attacks by homegrown terrorists, or when you've invaded another country to track down weapons of mass destruction, or you elect a lunatic as a head of state. We just don't get all the mundane stuff.

Then what's it to you to begin with? Buzz off, Princess Foul Mouth.

 

[magicalmoments]

Then what's it to you to begin with? Buzz off, Princess Foul Mouth.

Because our news media and social media is full of news about your lunatic head of state and his family and how he is going to run the USA as an extension of his business empire. I thought I'd educate myself about them. With what I've learned At this stage I'm betting that he'll be impeached before he completes his first 100 days and primarily because the Republicans will have realised that they can't control him. Have a nice day Yankee.