What right wing stupidity should we talk about today?

[lovetoread]

 

[Greypowerful]

Trump got bitch slapped by the those judges.

I can't wait to read his freak out on twitter.

.

The pitter-patter of tiny digits dancing on a virtual keyboard.

 

[Sean]

Bannon lost $60 million in a failed WoW gold farming scheme when he was at Goldman.

 

[OldJourno]

I know you desperately want to move the goal posts.

But it's cute the way you will go to any lengths to avoid talking about Trump repeatedly lying.

Why would I care about the goal posts on this or any other thread? For crying out loud, this is just another website.
I was in the military (active duty, not some place in Washington making dog houses or whatever in the Guard) during the Vietnam War era. Until now I have never - as in never - referred to my service as occurring during that time frame. Doing so might suggest that I served in Vietnam. Like your beloved Sen. Blumenthal's military service, the closest I've ever been to Vietnam is Washington state.
I don't doubt Blumenthal was somewhat accurate in detailing his conversation with the Supreme Court nominee. I'm also confident the nominee thought the topics covered in the conversation were private.
Gorsuch has learned his lesson and will likely be more close-mouthed in the future when dealing with slimeballs like your buddy Blumenthal.

 

[Magnetron]

This administration truly is the gift that keeps on giving.

 

[Antivirus]

https://up9.xhcdn.com/000/131/939/596_1000.gif

 

[FakeNews]

This administration truly is the gift that keeps on giving.

Thank you! Thank you!

Let's see.....Giving the American people safer borders, higher paying jobs, better housing, better schools, safer streets & lower taxes -- just to name a few!

 

[Adre]

http://i1239.photobucket.com/albums/ff502/Soonyigump/RWCJ_zps2dd53069.jpg

Now that Miles has gone and met his eternal reward, I nominate the Colonel to fill his spot in the Pantheon of Pathetic.

I second.

 

[Adre]

Thank you! Thank you!

Let's see.....Giving the American people safer borders, higher paying jobs, better housing, better schools, safer streets & lower taxes -- just to name a few!

Wow, your taxes went down? Explain.

 

[Carnal_Flower]

Oh yeah, his Cabinet is gonna do all that, yeah

Thank you! Thank you!

Let's see.....Giving the American people safer borders, higher paying jobs, better housing, better schools, safer streets & lower taxes -- just to name a few!

 

[FakeNews]

.

The pitter-patter of tiny digits dancing on a virtual keyboard.

I would like to think you'd be less concerned with American politics & more concerned with the fact the last time a team from Canada won the Stanley Cup was 1993.

 

[FakeNews]

Bannon lost $60 million in a failed WoW gold farming scheme when he was at Goldman.

Welcome to Wall Street, Junior.

 

[irksomesauce]

It's a gas reading Corporal rINO Butthurt left totally alone, fully impaled on a post of the political fence his socialist-lite ass so loves to straddle.

 

[Bookishleigh]

As previously posted, this smelled supreme court all over it.

It seems something's getting determined once and for all.

Coz the ban doesn't make sense anyway. Obama did a better job. If Trump was serious about this ban the way he imposed it, he'd have put a ban on all nationalities having visited those countries, and required to know why the person was there.

1. I love how hard you try - it's cute. It really, really is. But people just don't like you.
2. I'm glad you now recognize this "smelled supreme court" all over it. Because you were the one who was all conspiracy theorist about why was a judge working on the weekend and late hours, blah, blah, blah, and I said the law doesn't stop on the weekend and, oh, that this was likely being fast tracked to the Supreme Court. I can find that conversation if you like. I'm good at it. I'm also good at calling people (and you specifically) on their bullshit.
3. Maybe if you ask Laurelle really, really nice for a new name people might take you a little more seriously, EternalLame.

 

[FakeNews]

Thanks for sharing!

Imagine that! An American president that is concerned about the safety and security of the American people!

 

[Bookishleigh]

http://images.realclear.com/336138_5_.jpg

http://www.slate.com/content/dam/slate/blogs/the_eye/2014/03/27/the_history_of_the_late_night_tv_lawyer_commercial_99_invisible_by_roman/screen_shot_20140326_at_12.41.02_pm.png.CROP.promo-mediumlarge.png

http://cdn1.images.videobash.com/thumbs/000/401/135/320x240/320x240_10.jpg

I found some attorneys for him!!!

 

[Hard_Rom]

Please Bog, nooooooooo!

http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/cullen-angus-palin-ambassador-1.3974864

Cullen, Angus unimpressed at prospect of Sarah Palin as U.S. ambassador to Canada
Cullen says Palin couldn't recognize the truth 'if it jumped up and knocked her on the head'

 

[domroger]

I may be wrong but I think his record in court is more losses than wins .

 

[Wrong Element]

Actual footage of Trump in court:


http://cdn.images.express.co.uk/img/dynamic/139/590x/secondary/Cameron-591663.jpg

 

[Greypowerful]

I would like to think you'd be less concerned with American politics & more concerned with the fact the last time a team from Canada won the Stanley Cup was 1993.

That makes sense coming from a guy whose culture deifies high school athletes in stadia fit for Roman games.

The majority of top NHL PLAYERS have been Canadian- now joined by a host of talented European players. There ARE American Players, but they are still a minority.

Yes, Tiny Bettman runs the American megabuck cartel.... whatever. Money ball.

 

[Colonel Hogan]

Brilliant reply. Congrats on officially joining the RWCJ.

What's the matter, I even offered up something with legal implications.

You trying to be more irrelevant than Eyer?

I know. It's sad how far he's fallen. I mean, just look at the stupidity in that post. I gave him multiple topics to talk about including Kelly Anne Conway breaking the law and the best he could do was accuse me of having alts. *sadface*

Lighten up, Francis. Mine was intended as a tongue-in-cheek one-off jab at your scatter shot approach to the daily inventory of evidence which, to your mind, establishes all things vile and e-vile within the Trump administration.

Any one of those topics could well justify its own thread, so my flippant response was made with the sense of futility in attempting to discuss them ALL here at the same time. Sorry that didn't come through. My fault. Okay?

I'm not seriously accusing you of using alts, because, frankly, I don't care. The whole subject of alts in this forum bores me to distraction. I'll never understand people who DO use them. The literal embodiment of having too much time on one's hands.

But going back over your list, let's see what we've got....

Hyperbole over crime statistics.

Ivanka's clothing line "persecution."

Mitch McConnell is a sexist.

And Kelly Conway is too stupid not to understand that there is no such thing as an innocent, tongue-in-cheek comment. Yep, made that mistake myself today. Good thing I'm not in the White House either, I guess.

But really, there isn't much of substance here to talk about. At least, not much that interests me. It's mainly noise. Ill-advised incompetent noise? A lot of it, yeah.

Corrupt? Probably not. Doesn't quite rise to that level.

Scurrilous lies designed to defraud the American public? Oh, please....stick with "ill-advised and incompetent."

But, hey, whatever floats your boat. If these are the grave issues of the day that spark your passion, I will apologize for raining on your parade and leave you to your "debate."

I've got a Ninth Circuit Court opinion to wade through.

 

[Greypowerful]

I respect those FEW folks who, when wrong, promptly admit it.

In turn, I was in error in adding you to the RWHC.

If, in future, you could be a bit less prolific in your prose, I might actually learn MORE about the Sacred American Document. Thanks, Hoagie!

 

[zipman]

Why would I care about the goal posts on this or any other thread? For crying out loud, this is just another website.
I was in the military (active duty, not some place in Washington making dog houses or whatever in the Guard) during the Vietnam War era. Until now I have never - as in never - referred to my service as occurring during that time frame. Doing so might suggest that I served in Vietnam. Like your beloved Sen. Blumenthal's military service, the closest I've ever been to Vietnam is Washington state.
I don't doubt Blumenthal was somewhat accurate in detailing his conversation with the Supreme Court nominee. I'm also confident the nominee thought the topics covered in the conversation were private.
Gorsuch has learned his lesson and will likely be more close-mouthed in the future when dealing with slimeballs like your buddy Blumenthal.

After reading your initial comment again, it seems as though you didn't try and move the goal posts as much as you tried to minimize the impact of the topic by attacking Blumenthal. That you think asserting that somehow Blumenthal is my "buddy" speaks more to your own issues than any preference of mine.

Personally I think that falsely claiming to have been in Vietnam is a shameful thing to do but ultimately it has nothing to do with the content of what Gorsuch said, which has been confirmed by Gorsuch's own spokesperson.

Bu back to Gorsuch, who was the topic I think it is more than interesting that Trump's newest pick to SCOTUS essentially blasted his treatment of the judiciary. #notwinning

 

[Lancecastor]

Trump shaming anyone's service record amplifies his buffoonitude.

 

[zipman]

Lighten up, Francis. Mine was intended as a tongue-in-cheek one-off jab at your scatter shot approach to the daily inventory of evidence which, to your mind, establishes all things vile and e-vile within the Trump administration.

Any one of those topics could well justify its own thread, so my flippant response was made with the sense of futility in attempting to discuss them ALL here at the same time. Sorry that didn't come through. My fault. Okay?

I'm not seriously accusing you of using alts, because, frankly, I don't care. The whole subject of alts in this forum bores me to distraction. I'll never understand people who DO use them. The literal embodiment of having too much time on one's hands.

But going back over your list, let's see what we've got....

Hyperbole over crime statistics.

Ivanka's clothing line "persecution."

Mitch McConnell is a sexist.

And Kelly Conway is too stupid not to understand that there is no such thing as an innocent, tongue-in-cheek comment. Yep, made that mistake myself today. Good thing I'm not in the White House either, I guess.

But really, there isn't much of substance here to talk about. At least, not much that interests me. It's mainly noise. Ill-advised incompetent noise? A lot of it, yeah.

Corrupt? Probably not. Doesn't quite rise to that level.

Scurrilous lies designed to defraud the American public? Oh, please....stick with "ill-advised and incompetent."

But, hey, whatever floats your boat. If these are the grave issues of the day that spark your passion, I will apologize for raining on your parade and leave you to your "debate."

I've got a Ninth Circuit Court opinion to wade through.

Let's go in order, shall we?

I offered up what you called "a scatter shot approach" to all the things this administration has done over the course of two days because there were so many of them and to create individual threads on each would be spamming the board with them. I thought that would be obvious but I guess I should have spelled it considering my audience.

I hope you read the Ninth Circuit Court opinion more closely than you read my initial post, because no where in my post did I say you had to address all of them, you could have chosen any one of them to discuss.

As for the alts, it was just a means of tarnishing the content of my post. I've never had one as I have no problem discussing exactly what is on my mind and owning my words.

Now let's look at your comments on the actual topics:

"Hyperbole over crime statistics." - Except it wasn't hyperbole, which is an exaggeration, it was a flat out lie.

Ivanka's clothing line "persecution." - Instead of focusing on the that the National Security briefing he was in the Buffoon in the white house had to attack a department store over their business dealings with his daughter. Considering his own "hyperbole" about the dangers to our country, one would think he would pay attention for one hour.

"Mitch McConnell is a sexist." - Well, yes, that much was clear.

"And Kelly Conway is too stupid not to understand that there is no such thing as an innocent, tongue-in-cheek comment. Yep, made that mistake myself today. Good thing I'm not in the White House either, I guess." - I don't think you understand what a tongue-in-cheek comment is. She blatantly promoted Ivanka's clothing line which is against the law. There were legitimate fears over Trump (and by extension his administration) using that office to promote his own interests and the interests of his family and it happened less than one month into his presidency. Disgraceful.

"But really, there isn't much of substance here to talk about. At least, not much that interests me. It's mainly noise. Ill-advised incompetent noise? A lot of it, yeah." - At least we agree on the incompetence of this administration. That's a start.

"Corrupt? Probably not. Doesn't quite rise to that level." - perhaps, not yet. But the signs are there.


"Scurrilous lies designed to defraud the American public? Oh, please....stick with "ill-advised and incompetent." - I can't see how you can deny the President, and his top officials are blatantly lying. Crime statistics - lie. Terror attack in Atlanta and Bowling Green - lies. Alternative Facts? Come on and give me a break. For the white house to repeatedly lie over easily verifiable things is not just incompetence but shows a distinct inability to tell the truth. That should mean something to any citizen regardless of political party.

I'll say it again, you used to be better than this.