Right-to-work’ movement claims victory in Missouri, eyes NH next

EternalFantasy

Loves Spam
Joined
Dec 29, 2016
Posts
762
By Adam Shaw Published February 06, 2017

Republican Gov. Eric Greitens signed legislation on Monday making Missouri the latest “right-to-work” state, as the growing movement sets its sights next on New Hampshire – hoping to break into one of the labor unions’ last remaining strongholds.

Legislation advancing in the New Hampshire capital, if approved, would make the state the first in the Northeast to go “right-to-work.” The measure, which bars unions from forcing employees to join or pay dues, is set for a vote in the state’s House next week – after having passed the Senate.

The push is the latest sign of labor unions’ diminishing clout, and how Republican gains at the state level are having a broad impact on policy, amid support for such legislation from the Trump White House.

In Missouri, the new Republican governor declared Monday on Twitter that his state is “open for business,” after making it the 28th with a right-to-work policy.

View image on TwitterView image on TwitterView image on TwitterView image on Twitter
Follow
Eric Greitens ✔ @EricGreitens
Today, I signed Right to Work. This is about more jobs - Missourians are ready to work, and now our state is open for business!
11:26 AM - 6 Feb 2017
219 219 Retweets 444 444 likes
In January, Kentucky GOP Gov. Matt Bevin signed a similar bill after it breezed through the Republican-led legislature.

But even though Republicans won the governorship in New Hampshire last November, the right-to-work bill is still a toss-up in Concord.

State Republican Rep. Stephen Schmidt, chairman of the House labor committee, said some Republicans are not supporting the bill. While he personally backs it, Schmidt voiced doubts about the bill’s passage, saying it could come down to one or two votes.

“I believe it will be a very tight vote one way or another,” he told Fox News.

Should the bill make it to Republican Gov. Chris Sununu’s desk, he is expected to sign it. A similar measure had moved through the legislature in 2011, but had been vetoed by then-Gov. John Lynch, a Democrat.

The local branch of the AFL-CIO said the bill would only inhibit working families’ ability to bargain for what’s best for them.

“This bill will silence the teachers who advocate on behalf of smaller class sizes for our children, the transportation employees who negotiate for the equipment they need to keep the roads clear after a blizzard and the police and firefighters who negotiate for the staffing levels they need to keep us safe,” the New Hampshire union said.

Despite stiff resistance from unions, the right-to work-movement shows little sign of slowing down. Indiana, Michigan, Wisconsin and West Virginia have passed similar legislation in the last five years, in addition to Kentucky and now Missouri.

Some Republicans in Congress also are pushing national versions. Last week, Rep. Joe Wilson, R-S.C., introduced the National Right to Work Act, which would amend the National Labor Relations Act to give American workers the “right” not to be forced to join a union or pay union dues.

“Right-to-work states, like South Carolina, have seen first-hand that job creation and economic growth comes from expanded freedoms. We need to expand common-sense reforms, like those in the National Right to Work Act to protect American workers and create jobs,” Wilson said.

Like at the state level, the move is likely to face significant pushback from labor unions.

“Right to work is a lie dressed up in a feel-good slogan. It doesn’t give workers freedom—instead, it weakens our right to join together and bargain for better wages and working conditions,” AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka said in a statement responding to Wilson’s legislation.

Trumka accused Republicans of trying to kill off organized labor.

“Its end goal is to destroy unions. Numbers don’t lie. Workers in states with right to work laws have wages that are 12 percent lower. That’s because unions raise wages for all workers, not just our members,” he said.

But President Trump in the White House represents another boost for the movement. While President Barack Obama opposed such legislation, White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer made clear last week that Trump supports the efforts in New Hampshire and beyond.

“The president believes in right to work. He wants to give workers and companies the flexibility to do what's in the best interest for job creators,” Spicer said.


Adam Shaw is a Politics Reporter and occasional Opinion writer for FoxNews.com. He can be reached here or on Twitter: @AdamShawNY.
 
Is unions' influence really waning in the US? What is causing it?

is this good or bad?

One of the things causing this is crooked union bosses who rip off the people who should be benefiting. And Jimmy Hoffa is the person who is probably most responsible, in a negative way.
 
Is unions' influence really waning in the US? What is causing it?

is this good or bad?

Factory jobs are easier to unionize than jobs in stores, restaurants, hotels, and motels. The number of factory jobs has declined.

The Republican Party has always been hostile to labor unions. The Republican Party has dominated the United States since at least 1980.

Increasingly the Democrat Party has been dominated by well educated, well paid professionals. These people are mainly concerned with social issues. They do not need labor unions. Most of them do not care very much about people who do.

The work force has become increasingly diverse. A heterogeneous work force is more difficult to organize into labor unions than a homogeneous work force.

I think the decline in labor unions has been a bad thing. It is a major reason that the white working class never really recovered from the recession of 1974.
 
Last edited:
I suppose there's a paradox.

On one hand there's workers' rights, on the other, there's the severe reduction of quality of products and services when workers are unionized.

This administration seems to be taking a direction away from that low quality socialistic aspect that Obama started en-rooting. From charter schools, to an Obamacare repeal..

Wonder what's next.
 
Is unions' influence really waning in the US? What is causing it?

is this good or bad?

Once thing causing it is the decline of the form of employment for which that model of organized labor is best suited: a large workforce in a single factory with one management.
 
There aren't unions by profession?

There are but they aren't worth a fuck, nobody works as a fleet anymore.

Why make 20/hr working for someone else for a second longer than I have to when I can buy my own tools, truck and go charge people 5x as much??

No need for skilled labor to unionize under an entirely voluntary system.

All the safety and bullshit laws that are now nationwide and federal and everyone gets them.

So if a need comes up, pays x, you want it? Take it...or GTFO of the way for someone who does.



I think it's a good thing. Freedom> slavery.
 
There are but they aren't worth a fuck, nobody works as a fleet anymore.

Why make 20/hr working for someone else for a second longer than I have to when I can buy my own tools, truck and go charge people 5x as much??

No need for skilled labor to unionize under an entirely voluntary system.

All the safety and bullshit laws that are now nationwide and federal and everyone gets them.

So if a need comes up, pays x, you want it? Take it...or GTFO of the way for someone who does.



I think it's a good thing. Freedom> slavery.

Music to my ears.
 
What do conservatives have against organized labor anyway? It's just another form of bargaining in the marketplace.
 
Back
Top