When unhinged Left completely loses it

[FakeNews]

Ex-Obama Official Suggests ‘Military Coup’ Against Trump... http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/02/02/ex-obama-official-suggests-military-coup-trump/

 

[KingOrfeo]

Considering the way Trump is dissing the military, it's not entirely implausible. They'll put up with all kinds of shit in the service, but respect they absolutely must have.

 

[phrodeau]

The Pentagon has started an investigation into the Yemen raid that Trump ordered.

 

[irksomesauce]

Wow, what a surprise...

Another socialist offering unconstitutional action against America, which at least some of her fellow GB progressives are too pussy to stand up on this Board and support (they're much more comfortable staying the little chickenshits they naturally are).

Imagine if those who didn't like Obama offered the same "option" to unconstitutionally remove him from Office? Exactly.

Here's the socialist's - another enemy of America within - exact words offering that "military coup" is an "option" to sate all those who don't approve of President Trump:

The fourth possibility is one that until recently I would have said was unthinkable in the United States of America: a military coup, or at least a refusal by military leaders to obey certain orders.

3 Ways to Get Rid of President Trump Before 2020
https://foreignpolicy.com/2017/01/3...rump-before-2020-impeach-25th-amendment-coup/

Just another Blurt Bitch leading the socialist way for femprog boys everywhere.

You feeling lucky yet, punks?

Well, are you?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Xjr2hnOHiM

That's America, socialist punks, and it has absolutely nothing to do with "white"...

...but everything to do with the individual liberty view of just government for all - PERIOD.

 

[KingOrfeo]

Ex-Obama Official Suggests ‘Military Coup’ Against Trump... http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/02/02/ex-obama-official-suggests-military-coup-trump/

That article links to one far more interesting.

The fourth possibility is one that until recently I would have said was unthinkable in the United States of America: a military coup, or at least a refusal by military leaders to obey certain orders.

The principle of civilian control of the military has been deeply internalized by the U.S. military, which prides itself on its nonpartisan professionalism. What’s more, we know that a high-ranking lawbreaker with even a little subtlety can run rings around the uniformed military. During the first years of the George W. Bush administration, for instance, formal protests from the nation’s senior-most military lawyers didn’t stop the use of torture. When military leaders objected to tactics such as waterboarding, the Bush administration simply bypassed the military, getting the CIA and private contractors to do their dirty work.

But Trump isn’t subtle or sophisticated: He sets policy through rants and late-night tweets, not through quiet hints to aides and lawyers. He’s thin-skinned, erratic, and unconstrained — and his unexpected, self-indulgent pronouncements are reportedly sending shivers through even his closest aides.

What would top U.S. military leaders do if given an order that struck them as not merely ill-advised, but dangerously unhinged? An order that wasn’t along the lines of “Prepare a plan to invade Iraq if Congress authorizes it based on questionable intelligence,” but “Prepare to invade Mexico tomorrow!” or “Start rounding up Muslim Americans and sending them to Guantánamo!” or “I’m going to teach China a lesson — with nukes!”

It’s impossible to say, of course. The prospect of American military leaders responding to a presidential order with open defiance is frightening — but so, too, is the prospect of military obedience to an insane order. After all, military officers swear to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States, not the president. For the first time in my life, I can imagine plausible scenarios in which senior military officials might simply tell the president: “No, sir. We’re not doing that,” to thunderous applause from the New York Times editorial board.

All too, too true. Of course, she's not "suggesting" a military coup.

 

[Jennifer]

Breitbart is fake news. Come on. Try harder. Be better and smarter.

 

[FakeNews]

Breitbart is fake news. Come on. Try harder. Be better and smarter.

Thanks for your input, Cupcake. I always enjoy hearing from a Social Justice Warrior.

For your reading pleasure...

What Is A Social Justice Warrior (SJW)?... http://www.rooshv.com/what-is-a-social-justice-warrior-sjw

 

[KingOrfeo]

Thanks for your input, Cupcake. I always enjoy hearing from a Social Justice Warrior.

For your reading pleasure...

What Is A Social Justice Warrior (SJW)?... http://www.rooshv.com/what-is-a-social-justice-warrior-sjw

Something better than you.

 

[irksomesauce]

Breitbart is fake news. Come on. Try harder. Be better and smarter.

Tff.

You're nothing but a totally dependent, socialist cunt who gets off on weak males hurting you; ffs, you can't even achieve Blurt Bitch status on this progressively-ruled Board.

Here's your socialist comrade in her own words: none of your needed "fake news" bullshit at all, and absolutely nothing to do with Breibart:

The fourth possibility is one that until recently I would have said was unthinkable in the United States of America: a military coup, or at least a refusal by military leaders to obey certain orders.

3 Ways to Get Rid of President Trump Before 2020
https://foreignpolicy.com/2017/01/30...mendment-coup/

Now, why don't you run along like a good little socialist submissive and let the Blurt Bitch femprog boys handle it, k?

 

[KingOrfeo]

Now that we've all seen the relevant part of the article, we all know it's not a case of a leftist calling for a military coup.

That is the most important lesson to take away from this.

 

[water505]

Breitbart is fake news. Come on. Try harder. Be better and smarter.

If that's true you should be able to cite numerous examples.

Come on. Try hard. Be better and smarter.

 

[spacekowboy]

Anyone who takes Brietbart as gospel probably takes the gospel as gospel in which case I've got another fairy tale for you....


Its a cute little story about how your opinion means something.

 

[FeeNicks]

Anyone who takes NYTimes, WAPO, ABC,CBS, NBC, CNN, MSNBC as gospel probably takes the gospel as gospel in which case I've got another fairy tale for you....


Its a cute little story about how your opinion means something.

FYP, degenerate asshole

 

[KingOrfeo]

Anyone who takes Brietbart as gospel probably takes the gospel as gospel in which case I've got another fairy tale for you....


Its a cute little story about how your opinion means something.

Not in the Gospels, it don't. In the Gospels, nobody's opinion but God's means anything.