The Con Artist in Chief is at it again

someoneyouknow

Literotica Guru
Joined
Jun 5, 2006
Posts
28,274
Remember how Trump was all over the CIA and other intelligence agencies for their reporting of Russia's intervention in the election? Remember how he essentially told them they didn't know what they were doing and were liars? That the two page summary of the blackmail videos Russia has on him were nothing but fakes? Pepperidge Farm remembers:

http://www.cnn.com/2016/12/10/politics/donald-trump-response-russian-hacking/index.html

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/01/16/trump-slams-outgoing-cia-director-brennan-after-criticism-over-russia-threat.html

Today the con artist went to the CIA and told them, “I am so behind you, and I know maybe sometimes you haven’t gotten the backing that you’ve wanted.”

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/after-feud-with-intel-agencies-trump-tells-cia-that-i-am-so-behind-you/

What a sociopath.
 
I find sometimes it's important, for the hell of it at least, to try and use pure logic.

How on earth do your statements make any sense.

He went and told that to the agents, that he doesn't believe they had been getting good support, and that he will reverse that.

Two elements here: Heads of national intelligence (including CIA head), agents of national intelligence, CIA agents in this case.
 
Um... he blamed the media for his Nazi remark on the "leak" and his calling out the CIA on Iraq's weopons of mass distraction ... or should we only listen to some of what POTUS says?
 
I find sometimes it's important, for the hell of it at least, to try and use pure logic.

How on earth do your statements make any sense.

He went and told that to the agents, that he doesn't believe they had been getting good support, and that he will reverse that.

Two elements here: Heads of national intelligence (including CIA head), agents of national intelligence, CIA agents in this case.

He's the one who didn't give them support when the report indicated there are probably blackmail videos of him in Russia. He's the one who didn't give them support about Russian efforts to hack/alter the election or provide him support. He even threatened to change the way the CIA operates.

The statements make perfect sense unless you're trying to defend the co artist.
 
He's the one who didn't give them support when the report indicated there are probably blackmail videos of him in Russia. He's the one who didn't give them support about Russian efforts to hack/alter the election or provide him support. He even threatened to change the way the CIA operates.

The statements make perfect sense unless you're trying to defend the co artist.

Once more:

Two elements here: Heads of national intelligence (including CIA head), agents of national intelligence, CIA agents in this case.

Your statements refer to the first element: heads.

His address was to agents only. CIA leadership was absent.
 
Once more:

Two elements here: Heads of national intelligence (including CIA head), agents of national intelligence, CIA agents in this case.

Your statements refer to the first element: heads.

His address was to agents only. CIA leadership was absent.


EternalFlame is a fan obviously of alternative facts.
 
Back
Top