FBI never examined hacked DNC servers itself.So how do they KNOW Russia hacked it?

FeeNicks

Literotica Guru
Joined
Dec 31, 2016
Posts
1,379
Strong Horse Trump will revamp the politized CIA as well

no wonder they attack him
 
on a serious note

how COULD they NOT EXAMINE IT?


we know why

On a serious note, cyber intelligence agents would no more be assisted by PHYSICALLY examining hacked email servers than postal authorities would be aided in prosecuting a case of mail fraud by examining your fucking mail box!!

Hackers intercepted DNC message traffic at some undetermined point along many different routes. Running into the DNC and wrapping yellow crime scene tape around a bunch of routers and modems wouldn't have accomplished shit. :rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:
 
Then why did they rely on a Turd party for info, tell us Mrs Hogan

Why would authorities interview any relevant witnesses to a crime??? You don't think the paid contractor for the DNC IT operation had pertinent information about the security measures it employed?

You think that is the CIA's ONLY source for the hacking claim?

The bottom line is this: when I want an audit of whether our top intelligence agencies have botched an international cyber hacking investigation, YOURS will be the last number I call.
 
The bottom line is this: when I want an audit of whether our top intelligence agencies have botched an international cyber hacking investigation, YOURS will be the last number I call.

Asking the CIA and NSA may not be a good idea either. A quiet internal investigation with guilty parties retired or shifted sideways. Usual corporate result.
 
On a serious note, cyber intelligence agents would no more be assisted by PHYSICALLY examining hacked email servers than postal authorities would be aided in prosecuting a case of mail fraud by examining your fucking mail box!!

Hackers intercepted DNC message traffic at some undetermined point along many different routes. Running into the DNC and wrapping yellow crime scene tape around a bunch of routers and modems wouldn't have accomplished shit. :rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:

Ok, Mrs Hogan

Lemme then show you this

http://www.cnn.com/2017/01/05/politics/fbi-russia-hacking-dnc-crowdstrike/index.html


If its worthless to examine it, why did teh FBI ask and why were they rebuffed

WE KNOW WHY


YOU GOT KICKED IN THE CUNT

AND YOU ARE WRONG!:cool:
 
The NSA knows, since it has - or can achieve - access to any server in the world it wishes to. The NSA's collection is the source of all the "intelligence community"'s alleged information on this issue.

They just can't share with the American people that truth because that would concretely prove more of their unconstitutional actions against them. Of course, that also means they can recite the "truth" as anything they want.

It is so wretchedly sad to watch these devious traitors milk and milk every last ounce of trust in government out of loyally naive Americans.

What a intentionally despicable act against your fellow man.

HOWEVER...

Perhaps this is actually great for the New America ahead, as when all this treachery is finally resolved even the most naive American left standing will then have naturally acquired a gloriously healthy, civil distrust of the necessary evil known to individual liberty lovers as "government".
 
Ok, Mrs Hogan

Lemme then show you this

http://www.cnn.com/2017/01/05/politics/fbi-russia-hacking-dnc-crowdstrike/index.html


If its worthless to examine it, why did teh FBI ask and why were they rebuffed

WE KNOW WHY


YOU GOT KICKED IN THE CUNT

AND YOU ARE WRONG!:cool:

"The FBI repeatedly stressed to DNC officials the necessity of obtaining direct access to servers and data, only to be rebuffed until well after the initial compromise had been mitigated," a senior law enforcement official told CNN. "This left the FBI no choice but to rely upon a third party for information. These actions caused significant delays and inhibited the FBI from addressing the intrusion earlier."

This statement is in response to reports that the FBI never asked the DNC for access to the hacked systems.

http://www.cnn.com/2017/01/05/politics/fbi-russia-hacking-dnc-crowdstrike/index.html

Let me get this straight. You're so giddy about ME being "wrong" about the FBI's desire to physically examine DNC servers that you are concurrently oblivious about YOU being wrong with respect to them shirking their apparent "duty" when in fact they were refused access to the servers by the DNC? This is your idea of a win?

Furthermore, your contention that the FBI "made the whole thing up" based on their lack of access to those same servers ignores the role of the CIA and its intelligence assets in the investigation.

Whatever value examination of the servers might have offered, proof of Russian complicity does not necessarily hinge on that access alone. And if it did, what the fuck could the DNC possibly be thinking in denying access???

In other words, whatever misjudgments I may have made about the value of physically examining hacked servers continues to pale in comparison to your own ignorant armchair sniping about the government's investigation into the affair.

Dumbass.

So guess which other thread I'm copying this response to.
 
Last edited:
Mrs Hogan attempting to COVER UP being kicked in CUNT

self kicks herself in CUNT:D


there is NO such thing as denying the FBI anything, it doesnt work that way...that the DNC did deny and that the FBI did nothing abut it shows the FBI did in fact collude with DNC to cover up....that is obvious

that the FBI wanted to examine it

that the DNC refused

that the FBI 'relied" on a turd party for info, a party chosen by the DNC further shows

the PHYSICAL examination was crucial

the FBI covered up

the DNC covered up
 
Back
Top