The Greatest Scientic Fraud of All Time

trysail

Catch Me Who Can
Joined
Nov 8, 2005
Posts
25,593
The Greatest Scientific Fraud of All Time


The Greatest Scientific Fraud Of All Time

by Francis Menton

...NASA has baked in a good 0.2 deg C or so of "adjustments" just since 1995 to give it a comfortable margin to claim a "record" for 2016. Expect that breathless announcement from NASA within the next couple of weeks. (Prior experience indicates that NASA press releases come out around the 18th to the 20th of the month.)

If you want to make a prediction of the future about as safe as predicting the time of tomorrow's sunrise, you can predict that every mainstream news source in the country will parrot the upcoming NASA press release without mentioning that the new supposed "record" is not supported by the far-more-accurate satellite data. Nor will any mainstream news source ask the obvious question of how it is that global warming is supposed to be caused by CO2 emissions, yet temperature records always and only seem to be associated with El Niños...​




 
Last edited:

The Greatest Scientific Fraud Of All Time

by Francis Minton



If you want to make a prediction of the future about as safe as predicting the time of tomorrow's sunrise, you can predict that every mainstream news source in the country will parrot the upcoming NASA press release without mentioning that the new supposed "record" is not supported by the far-more-accurate satellite data. Nor will any mainstream news source ask the obvious question of how it is that global warming is supposed to be caused by CO2 emissions, yet temperature records always and only seem to be associated with El Niños...​





Once again the BS piles higher and deeper. An independent study came out the other day which categorically stated the complete opposite. Specifically:

The new international study looked at satellite data, readings from buoys and other marine floats for ocean temperatures. Each measurement system independently showed the same 20 years of increase in temperatures that NOAA found: about two-tenths of a degree Fahrenheit per decade since 2000, said the study’s lead author, Zeke Hausfather of the University of California, Berkeley.

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/global-warming-data-that-riled-doubters-turns-out-to-be-true/
 
Once again the BS piles higher and deeper. An independent study came out the other day which categorically stated the complete opposite. Specifically:

The new international study looked at satellite data, readings from buoys and other marine floats for ocean temperatures. Each measurement system independently showed the same 20 years of increase in temperatures that NOAA found: about two-tenths of a degree Fahrenheit per decade since 2000, said the study’s lead author, Zeke Hausfather of the University of California, Berkeley.

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/global-warming-data-that-riled-doubters-turns-out-to-be-true/


it hasn't been 20 years since 2000, so 1.6 decades, not even 2.

The thermometers in the buoys and satellites won't measure to a hundredth of a degree which would be required to get a tenth of a degree average.

Yup, BS abounds
 
Ice age is a possible result of global warming. Melting Greenland ice cap can shut down the Gulf Stream current. If not for the Gulf Stream the UK would have a boreal climate like Labrador and Norway would be pretty much arctic conditions.

Wait until orbit wobble brings northern hemisphere closest to the sun during summer and winter like the southern hemisphere is now.
 
it hasn't been 20 years since 2000, so 1.6 decades, not even 2.

The thermometers in the buoys and satellites won't measure to a hundredth of a degree which would be required to get a tenth of a degree average.

Yup, BS abounds

Because facts don't matter, right? All those scientists, all those raw data readings from satellites (which you mentioned) are wrong. Only you are right because you keep moving the goalposts once the kick up your ass has been made.
 




https://judithcurry.com/2017/01/03/jc-in-transition/


Effective January 1, I have resigned my tenured faculty position at Georgia Tech...

...A deciding factor was that I no longer know what to say to students and postdocs regarding how to navigate the CRAZINESS in the field of climate science. Research and other professional activities are professionally rewarded only if they are channeled in certain directions approved by a politicized academic establishment — funding, ease of getting your papers published, getting hired in prestigious positions, appointments to prestigious committees and boards, professional recognition, etc.

How young scientists are to navigate all this is beyond me, and it often becomes a battle of scientific integrity versus career suicide (I have worked through these issues with a number of skeptical young scientists)...


-Judith A. Curry, Ph.D.
Professor & Chair (emeritus), School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences
Georgia Institute of Technology
Ph.D., Geophysical Sciences, University of Chicago, 1982
NASA Advisory Council Earth Science Subcommittee
Fellow, American Meteorological Society
Fellow, American Association for the Advancement of Science
Fellow, American Geophysical Union​


https://judithcurry.com/2017/01/03/jc-in-transition/


 
Because facts don't matter, right? All those scientists, all those raw data readings from satellites (which you mentioned) are wrong. Only you are right because you keep moving the goalposts once the kick up your ass has been made.

Data that shows an insignificant increase is not "wrong." It's insignificant. Pretending that an insignificant, barely measurable increase, well within the margin of error is significant doesn't make it significant, it still is insignificant because of its insignificance.

The only significance this has at all is the fig leaf that it provides to the alarmists, who wish to explain the pause in global warming away.

"No, no, no...You see?!?? The needle moved! Look at that-----> it's a squiggle. No, it's not because we've breathed on the needle.. it's a squiggle.. really, really...it moved! Honest."

None of this is anything for alarmists to crow about. Which is why NASA was cooking the books- to make the squiggle look a little bit bigger. Removing the fraud NASA introduced into the process to reveal that there is a tiny squiggle beneath the fraud that made it a small squiggle doesn't make the squiggle significant.

Not at all the degree of warming that we were assured was imminent by the holy see at the church of the alarmists. The models were all so embarrassingly wrong that it's been quite a while since I've seen anyone from the church of global warming making any specific prognostications about the future other than it's going to get hot and polar bears are going to drown.
 

The Greatest Scientific Fraud Of All Time

by Francis Minton

...NASA has baked in a good 0.2 deg C or so of "adjustments" just since 1995 to give it a comfortable margin to claim a "record" for 2016. Expect that breathless announcement from NASA within the next couple of weeks. (Prior experience indicates that NASA press releases come out around the 18th to the 20th of the month.)

If you want to make a prediction of the future about as safe as predicting the time of tomorrow's sunrise, you can predict that every mainstream news source in the country will parrot the upcoming NASA press release without mentioning that the new supposed "record" is not supported by the far-more-accurate satellite data. Nor will any mainstream news source ask the obvious question of how it is that global warming is supposed to be caused by CO2 emissions, yet temperature records always and only seem to be associated with El Niños...​





Global Warming Denialist Greatest Hits #6: But...but..teh Models are UNRELIABLE!!


Global Warming Denialist Greatest Hits #11: But...but..Time Magazine said teh opposite in teh 1970s!!
 
Ice age is a possible result of global warming. Melting Greenland ice cap can shut down the Gulf Stream current. If not for the Gulf Stream the UK would have a boreal climate like Labrador and Norway would be pretty much arctic conditions.

Wait until orbit wobble brings northern hemisphere closest to the sun during summer and winter like the southern hemisphere is now.

What's the "over/under" on how long I have to wait for "orbit wobble"? Is it as imminent as global boiling itself? I've been having some balance problems when walking. Can I blame it on OW?
 
What's the "over/under" on how long I have to wait for "orbit wobble"? Is it as imminent as global boiling itself? I've been having some balance problems when walking. Can I blame it on OW?


Every 40,000 years.

Hopefully, HardRim is holding his breath.
 
Gracious! That is alarming.

It has warmed TWICE the previously thought point zero seven degrees Celsius?!!??

This problem is obviously twice as urgent as previously thought. I'm going to run right out and cut my negligible carbon footprint in half today.
Great idea.

Start by turning off your computer.
 
Gracious! That is alarming.

It has warmed TWICE the previously thought point zero seven degrees Celsius?!!??

This problem is obviously twice as urgent as previously thought. I'm going to run right out and cut my negligible carbon footprint in half today.

The solution to this emergency is clear.....more taxes!!!

Of course!! Did you expect any other response? :confused:

It's the solution that fits and fixes EVERYTHING!!!:D
 
Great idea.

Start by turning off your computer.

You first. As a self anointed High Priest in the Holy order of the Church of Global Warming I'm surprised that you haven't done so already.

Wait.

You use a computer?!??

Do you realize what the carbon footprint is of one of those verses the minimalist smart phone that I'm using?
 
Back
Top