That is what you want. This is what you get.

[gotsnowgotslush]

Did you vote for Trump ?

What did you want ?

 

[Boxlicker101]

Did you vote for Trump ?

What did you want ?

I did not vote for Trump but, if I had, it would have been because I wanted reasonable competence, rather than blunders.

 

[gotsnowgotslush]

Jabba the Drumpf and his female slave hosted a gathering at his Mar-a-Lago lair.

Jabba the Drumpf is using the press to advertise his real estate, again.

Must keep those properties in the public eye!

Jabba has to feed his loyal lap dogs.

Who attended the "off the record" cocktail party, on Sunday?

Jeremy Diamond from CNN knows.

Mike Allen of Politico ( do not blame Politico. M.A. left for Axios) Terrence Dopp of Bloomberg News, Ali Vitali of and Hallie Jackson of MSNBC/NBC.

No surprise, that FOX TV sent Brian Kilmeade.

19 people joined Jabba the Drumpf, for a poolside chat.

What did they talk about, for a half hour ?

Most smiled for the camera, when the took part in Jabba the Drumpf's photo op.

http://www.mediaite.com/online/phot...tty-trump-earns-rebuke-terribly-embarrassing/

Hallie Jackson of NBC and Adrian Carrasquillo of BuzzFeed were there.


Jabba the Drumf's media lapdogs were fed treats, in the lair's ballroom, after they performed their tricks?

Trump wine and potato chips.

Donald Trump hasn't held a press conference in over 140 days.

Has not answered direct questions for six months.


Jeff Mason of Reuters made a statement about reporters and journalists not given press access.


gsgs comment-

Whoever has heard of guard dogs that have no teeth, and do not bark ?

Jabba has converted them into lap dogs that provide him with free advertising.

 

[sr71plt]

I did not vote for Trump but, if I had, it would have been because I wanted reasonable competence, rather than blunders.

Ah, so you were off on another planet for the Trump campaign.

 

[BotanyBoy]

Did you vote for Trump ?

I'm not a lefty so no, but it is preferable to Clinton.

What did you want ?

To watch people like you and SR71 spaz the fuck out, get bitter and double down on the hatred and intolerance that cost them the election.

 

[phrodeau]

I'm not a lefty so no, but it is preferable to Clinton.



To watch people like you and SR71 spaz the fuck out, get bitter and double down on the hatred and intolerance that cost them the election.

The only poster I see spazzing the fuck out is you, on occasion.

I'm guessing that it's the occasions you're sober.

 

[BotanyBoy]

The only poster I see spazzing the fuck out is you, on occasion.

I'm guessing that it's the occasions you're sober.

That's your wishful thinking lil guy.

I'm not the one writing incoherent, hysterical, baseless rants about Trump and the dark ages to come on a daily basis.

 

[Iceprincess12]

I wanted a Sephora gift card.

 

[sr71plt]

The only poster I see spazzing the fuck out is you, on occasion.

Yep, just more deflection.

 

[phrodeau]

That's your wishful thinking lil guy.

I'm not the one writing incoherent, hysterical, baseless rants about Trump and the dark ages to come on a daily basis.

Neither am I. If my word choice gives you trouble, I suggest using a good dictionary.

 

[sr71plt]

Neither am I. If my word choice gives you trouble, I suggest using a good dictionary.

Neither am I, which goes back to BB's original pathetic lie and attempt at deflection. Such a pathetic little creature is BB.

 

[BotanyBoy]

Neither am I.

Neither am I

Said the two most asshurt cryin' about Tromp Clinton fan boys on the board LMFAO!!!

If my word choice gives you trouble, I suggest using a good dictionary.

You don't have the vocabulary to give me trouble

which goes back to BB's original pathetic lie and attempt at deflection. Such a pathetic little creature is BB.

What deflection? Deflecting from what? Your daily wails about Trump

Enjoy the Trump presidency SR LOL.

 

[Chris_Michael]

I wanted to not have a criminal as my president.

http://politicalmemes.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/hillary_memes-1.png​

 

[phrodeau]

I wanted to not have a criminal as my president.

http://politicalmemes.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/hillary_memes-1.png​

But you got one.

http://www.bbc.com/news/election-us-2016-37956018

 

[BotanyBoy]

But you got one.

http://www.bbc.com/news/election-us-2016-37956018

Lawsuits = criminal?

Since when??

Also the FBI hasn't come out and told us he committed a bunch of felonies we were currently fucking numerous people up the ass for lengthy prison sentences for but also not going to press charges because.......because Clinton.

 

[KingOrfeo]

Also the FBI hasn't come out and told us he committed a bunch of felonies we were currently fucking numerous people up the ass for lengthy prison sentences for but also not going to press charges because.......because Clinton.

Did that sentence make sense in your head, before you typed it?

 

[BotanyBoy]

Did that sentence make sense in your head, before you typed it?

It makes sense if you're not drunk on Clinton Kool-Aid.

She got caught with classified shit on her private e-thinggies.....that's hard time for mere mortals who aren't above the law because Clinton.

We were prosecuting no less than 3 people for those exact crimes when the FBI said they recommended no charges.....because Clinton.

 

[phrodeau]

It makes sense if you're not drunk on Clinton Kool-Aid.

She got caught with classified shit on her private e-thinggies.....that's hard time for mere mortals who aren't above the law because Clinton.

We were prosecuting no less than 3 people for those exact crimes when the FBI said they recommended no charges.....because Clinton.

https://media.giphy.com/media/3oz8xLd9DJq2l2VFtu/giphy.gif

 

[BotanyBoy]

https://media.giphy.com/media/3oz8xLd9DJq2l2VFtu/giphy.gif

http://www.cnn.com/2016/08/16/politics/navy-sailor-clinton-email-defense/


I'm not even going to dig for the others because I only need 1.


Put the Kool-Aid down phro.....

 

[KingOrfeo]

She got caught with classified shit on her private e-thinggies.....that's hard time for mere mortals who aren't above the law because Clinton.

Wrong.

We were prosecuting no less than 3 people for those exact crimes . . .

Who?

 

[BotanyBoy]

Wrong.

Why use a wiki opinion when you can get it straight from the source?

https://www.fbi.gov/news/pressrel/p...-clinton2019s-use-of-a-personal-e-mail-system

"From the group of 30,000 e-mails returned to the State Department, 110 e-mails in 52 e-mail chains have been determined by the owning agency to contain classified information at the time they were sent or received. Eight of those chains contained information that was Top Secret at the time they were sent; 36 chains contained Secret information at the time; and eight contained Confidential information, which is the lowest level of classification. "

"seven e-mail chains concern matters that were classified at the Top Secret/Special Access Program level when they were sent and received. These chains involved Secretary Clinton both sending e-mails about those matters and receiving e-mails from others about the same matters. There is evidence to support a conclusion that any reasonable person in Secretary Clinton’s position, or in the position of those government employees with whom she was corresponding about these matters, should have known that an unclassified system was no place for that conversation. In addition to this highly sensitive information, we also found information that was properly classified as Secret by the U.S. Intelligence Community at the time it was discussed on e-mail (that is, excluding the later “up-classified” e-mails).

None of these e-mails should have been on any kind of unclassified system, but their presence is especially concerning because all of these e-mails were housed on unclassified personal servers not even supported by full-time security staff, like those found at Departments and Agencies of the U.S. Government—or even with a commercial service like Gmail."



Reality is your girl got busted doing something we regularly shit can people for, was showered in sweetheart immunity deals, pled the 5th and got covered for by the DOJ. The diehard (D)'s bought into the idea that proved her innocence but they were the only ones.

Everyone else saw through it because the know we regularly fuck people up for slipping when it comes to national security and was fucking disgusted at the blatant (D) elitism on display. Just like they were when they found out the DNC had already decided Sanders was just not going to happen.

Who?

I linked one in the previous post, a Navy PO2. Classified material on a cell phone picture, he's fuckin' toast....

I read about an Army SFC who put something in an email he shouldn't have and an Army 1LT who loaded maps onto his personal computer accidentally and failed to immediately inform his COC instead just deleting it thinking that was going to do. They are all in prison now. Lives permanently ruined. Classified info on personal e devices is a fucking major league NO GO if you're a poor person.

But seeing as I posted one, and one is enough, if you want more you can go dig for it yourself but we prosecute people for security fuck ups all the time, military and civilian. Except Clinton of course.....laws are for poor people not elite Democrats.

 

[KingOrfeo]

Why use a wiki opinion when you can get it straight from the source?

Because the RationalWiki page puts things in their proper perspective:

Emails

Long story short, most politicians are technophobes. Some of the State Department's emails contained highly-classified information that was sent from an insecure server. Later on, somebody dug up a policy, blew some dust off it and discovered that what everyone was doing was against official regs, effectively saying Hey, stop using your smartphones and go back to using state e-mail.[159][160][161] This memo was about as popular as the plague and went conveniently ignored.[162]

BlackBerrys caught on with politicians back when they were the top mobile company. That peculiarity never really went away.[163] Obama was granted a secure BlackBerry like he requested, as was Condoleezza Rice, the previous SoS. Clinton was repeatedly denied one as it was too much of a security risk and they wanted to phase it out.[164] (In exchange, the NSA offered her this monstrosity.[165]) She could have had two devices, one for state.gov (which, based on the Mills deposition, can be accessed from State-issued mobile devices[166]) and one for her private email. That would have given her more protection, since she could say everything on her private server is personal, everything on the state.gov server is 'work.' Clinton stupidly used only one of each (at home![167]), because didn't want to have to partition conversations between different devices and addresses.

Even the State Department IG report mentioned how inadequate their digital infrastructure is: For example, Colin Powell justified his use of a private email address, saying, "State's system at the time was inadequate."[168] State's e-mail has been hacked extensively by Russia, and they didn't get around to scrubbing it for months (perhaps Russia is still balls-deep in the network as we speak?). There is also no money to fix it. One of Clinton's e-mail exchanges in 2011 concerning how inadequate State Dept. technology was. The Department's Director of Policy Planning wrote to Clinton and her aides:

I’m sure you’ve thought of this, but it would be a great time for someone inside or outside to make a statement/ write an op-ed that points out that State’s technology is so antiquated that NO ONE uses a State-issued laptop and even high officials routinely end up using their home email accounts to be able to get their work done quickly and effectively. Further cuts to State’s budget just makes matters much much worse. We actually need more funds to significantly upgrade our technology.[169]

And Clinton agreed. They discussed strategy to get more funding to improve things, but didn't want to go public with it for fear of alerting enemies to another snafu. It doesn't seem to be an isolated issue: The current SoS, John Kerry, was caught in December still using a private email account.[170] There's a long Daily Show segment (actually, several segments) covering in detail the complete inadequacy of the computer systems at the Department of Veterans Affairs and how it's made their job effectively impossible and defied any attempts to fix it.[171]

Slashing government funding has consequences, even if they're not immediate. In retrospect, it was brilliant on Republicans' part, because she gets blamed for a lot of the fallout, e.g. cutting funding for embassy security after Clinton warned them that it would affect national security (but that's another topic.)

So why not just use a state.gov address? Well, here's where FOIA may come into play. Clinton is a paranoid person,[172] mostly because she has been under constant scrutiny for the last quarter-century. Most of those investigations have included FOIA requests. The Freedom of Information Act can perform its transparency function only when government employees follow the e-mail guidelines.[173] Clinton supporter and former Governor and senator of Nebraska, Bob Kerrey, is disturbed by the email scandal: “It is about wanting to avoid the reach of citizens using FOIA to find out what their government is doing, and then not telling the truth about why she did.”[174] Though, she likely hasn't done anything criminal,[175] her subsequent improper deletion of 30,000 emails violated the Federal Records Act[wp].[176] The FBI conducted a criminal investigation into this matter and it appears that the use of the private server violates several federal criminal statutes.

On July 5, 2016, FBI director James Comey issued a statement that said that Clinton's use of the server was 'careless', but that no criminal charges had been recommended:[177]

Comey said that the FBI could not find a case in the past that would support bringing criminal charges based upon the facts. The bureau did not find clearly intentional and willful mishandling of classified information or vast quantities of materials, or indications of disloyalty to the U.S. or efforts to obstruct justice.

More or less torpedoing the idea that blanket punishments should be applied severely and across all avenues of life.

Just days before election day, Comey thought that it would be a swell idea forego the Justice Department's standards of election non-intervention to inform Congress of the discovery of new emails that could be "pertinent" to their previous investigation. This spurred a week-long media speculation-fest on what the emails could be, though they mostly turned out to be duplicates.[178]

 

[BotanyBoy]

Because the RationalWiki page puts things in their proper perspective:

No it give the liburhul spin and thus confirmation bias you seek.

"The bureau did not find clearly intentional and willful mishandling of classified information"

Which is a standard they don't give a shit about when they regularly lock up poor people up for negligently mishandling national security and you can't chug enough of that Kool-Aid. Totally ignoring injustice in favor of partisan butt licking.

It's well documented, irrefutable (D) elitism that stank so bad it no doubt contributed to her failing to win anywhere but the most diehard (D) megaplex metro strongholds.