Trump to eliminate taxation of profits to bring companies back!

[Conager]

You heard me right. No more excuses for shipping jobs overseas.

So ....... now where does Trump come up with funding for the military, Mexico Fence construction, big brass knockers on the White House, etc?

A futile exercise in theoretics?

Or does the GeeBee Brain Trust actually have credible methods to fund the Fed without leeching the wallets of America's entrepeneurs?

I didn't hear you complaining about 4 trillion dollars a year budget the last 8 years not that we have an actual budget that's just the spending. When you consider that we only take in 60% of that and all the rest is borrowed or printed I don't really see how you would see this as a problem except for the fact there's an R after Trump's name

 

[Disgustipated]

What in the hell are you talking about?

You say that a lot to everyone. Might wanna think about that for a minute.

 

[Ishmael]

* waves magic wand*

POOF!

Corporate Tax is gone.




Now, back to the topic of funding the Military and such without burdening busineses.

I can't decide which is more astonishing, the fact that you don't even know what you're griping about or that you didn't understand a word I wrote.

Ishmael

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

I can't decide which is more astonishing, the fact that you don't even know what you're griping about or that you didn't understand a word I wrote.

Ishmael

Don't worry, soon he will turn sarcastic and the topic will be one he no longer wishes to address because he has no empathy for all those military people who voted for Trump; after all, he didn't...



I didn't either, but I remained sane when he won.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Perhaps, it would now be a time for Magnum PI, CPA to do a Maxine Waters and posit that perhaps the government should be taking over the management of all these companies and then hold them accountable to their fair share of tax collection.

 

[Magnetron]

Don't worry, soon he will turn sarcastic and the topic will be one he no longer wishes to address because he has no empathy for all those military people who voted for Trump; after all, he didn't...



I didn't either, but I remained sane when he won.

So far, you've been the only one to propose an alternative.

If I'm to be sarcastic, it would be to those like Query, Eyer and Captain Obvi-Ish.

The potatoes in my pantry are generating more electrical activity than them.

 

[BotanyBoy]

Or does the GeeBee Brain Trust actually have credible methods to fund the Fed without leeching the wallets of America's entrepeneurs?

You mean the fed that just found 130 billion in waste just in the pentagon?

Look for more waste.

Thank you for offering nothing substantial to the discussion.

You don't seem to understand that he just shit on your premise.

But it's ok just ignore reality.

Now, back to the topic of funding the Military and such without burdening busineses.

Reducing waste even from a not-trying standpoint would render at least a few hundred billion.

Then hose the social welfare programs....can them.

No more funding problems.

 

[Magnetron]

You mean the fed that just found 130 billion in waste just in the pentagon?

Look for more waste.



You don't seem to understand that he just shit on your premise.

But it's ok just ignore reality.



Reducing waste even from a not-trying standpoint would render at least a few hundred billion.

Then hose the social welfare programs....can them.

No more funding problems.

Sounds to me like your jackboot would be on the necks of all those Congressmen porking up bills to enrich their states.



I like it.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

So far, you've been the only one to propose an alternative.

If I'm to be sarcastic, it would be to those like Query, Eyer and Captain Obvi-Ish.

The potatoes in my pantry are generating more electrical activity than them.

A superior alternative.

Then when Congress decides it need more money, it has to sell its voter base on the idea since the tax hits everyone who spends equally. In the arena of "fairness," those who spend more, pay more tax and (and this is the part you will like) businesses have to pay taxes on everything they consume (like office supplies etc.) in the process of creating that good or service, which now costs less thanks to the reduction of all burdens of tax code compliance.

 

[JohnnySavage]

I didn't hear you complaining about 4 trillion dollars a year budget the last 8 years not that we have an actual budget that's just the spending. When you consider that we only take in 60% of that and all the rest is borrowed or printed I don't really see how you would see this as a problem except for the fact there's an R after Trump's name

Our budget is about $3.8 Trillion. The deficit is about $500 Billion. Someone do the maths on that. I don't think it's 40%

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

"You don't seem to understand that he just shit on your premise.

"But it's ok just ignore reality. "

*chuckle*

You can ignore reality, but you cannot ignore the results of ignoring reality.
Ayn Rand

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Our budget is about $3.8 Trillion. The deficit is about $500 Million. Someone do the maths on that. I don't think it's 40%

What is the accrued deficit in terms of actual debt?

Talking about an annual deficit is a lie by omission.

 

[Ishmael]

What is the accrued deficit in terms of actual debt?

Talking about an annual deficit is a lie by omission.

But it sounds better.

Wanna talk about the unfunded liabilities? *chuckle*

Ishmael

 

[BotanyBoy]

Sounds to me like your jackboot would be on the necks of all those Congressmen porking up bills to enrich their states.



I like it.

No I'd be taking their jackboot and the jackboot of the poor off of my neck.

 

[Disgustipated]

Our budget is about $3.8 Trillion. The deficit is about $500 Million. Someone do the maths on that. I don't think it's 40%

Hey, some people's children think 81% of 100% leaves you 20%.

 

[Magnetron]

I personally favor a taxless system, in which the Fed prints money to fund itself in correlation to profits generated.

For example, for every $100 in profit that Botany's House of Bong reports, the Fed generates $5.

 

[Magnetron]

No I'd be taking their jackboot and the jackboot of the poor off of my neck.

Then you might want to explain more in depth how you actually go about removing wasteful spending by Congressman.

Bridges to Nowhere don't just magically spring up overnight.

 

[VaticanAssassin]

Hey, some people's children think 81% of 100% leaves you 20%.

You should probably point out where someone said that.

Otherwise you are just a lying, uneducated, copy boy, troll who has to finance phone.

Wait. Never mind. We all know the truth.....

 

[BotanyBoy]

I personally favor a taxless system, in which the Fed prints money to fund itself in correlation to profits generated.

For example, for every $100 in profit that Botany's House of Bong reports, the Fed generates $5.

Wow.

LOL

Then you might want to explain more in depth how you actually go about removing wasteful spending by Congressman.

Bridges to Nowhere don't just magically spring up overnight.

I didn't say anything about wasteful spending by congressman.

I just said wasteful spending.

 

[Magnetron]

I didn't say anything about wasteful spending by congressman.

I just said wasteful spending.

Some Congressmen spend wastefully.

 

[Magnetron]

Perhaps Query, Eyer and Ishsmall will spend the rest of the day coming up with their proposals.

 

[Hard_Rom]

Has T-Rump announced any military policies? Disengaging from overseas will safe a couple of bucks or billions. Any plans to cancel procurements or cut manpower? Not that it is a good idea in the US to announce that before it is a done deal. Replace lost corporate taxes with cuts to social programs and military spending. Build lots of fences with those policies.

 

[phrodeau]

Has T-Rump announced any military policies? Disengaging from overseas will safe a couple of bucks or billions. Any plans to cancel procurements or cut manpower? Not that it is a good idea in the US to announce that before it is a done deal. Replace lost corporate taxes with cuts to social programs and military spending. Build lots of fences with those policies.

He has some opinions about military aircraft.

 

[phrodeau]

Perhaps Query, Eyer and Ishsmall will spend the rest of the day coming up with their proposals.

Not their bailiwick. They only shoot down the comments and proposals they come across and deride them as intellectually flawed, without any explanation or alternatives.

 

[BotanyBoy]

Some Congressmen spend wastefully.

Indeed, but a lot of very real waste is done by bureaucrats if not the majority of it.