So, is 90% of Miami going to go back to Cuba?

BoyNextDoor

I hate liars
Joined
Apr 19, 2010
Posts
14,158
... and will the public policy that allows every Cuban that makes landfall in the US to be a citizen be reverted?
 
... and will the public policy that allows every Cuban that makes landfall in the US to be a citizen be reverted?

A: You mean the Clinton policy wet foot/dry foot?
B: That is not how that policy works....That is not how that policy works at all.
 
I was actually thinking about the Cuban Adjustment Act

It doesn't let them be citizens, it gives them a green card and only if they've been here a year. The whole point of it is to allow Cubans in above the immigration cap.
 
It would seem like the era for preferential treatment for Cubans and their entry in the US should come to an end, no?

Correcting Unfair Benefits for Aliens Act is poised and ready to go.
 
It's easier for him to just ascribe your position.

If you are not Luk you are certainly as stupid......

As I asked him if that is what he meant I didn't "ascribe" anything.

As they are essentially the same and no one is given citizenship you have failed on every level possible....

Good work!!!


The wet foot, dry foot policy is the name given to a consequence of the 1995 revision of the Cuban Adjustment Act of 1966 that essentially says that anyone who fled Cuba and entered the United States would be allowed to pursue residency a year later. After talks with the Cuban government, the Clinton administration came to an agreement with Cuba that it would stop admitting people intercepted in U.S. waters. Since then, in what has become known as the "Wet foot, Dry foot" policy, a Cuban caught on the waters between the two nations (with "wet feet") would summarily be sent home or to a third country. One who makes it to shore ("dry feet") gets a chance to remain in the United States, and later would qualify for expedited "legal permanent resident" status and eventually U.S. citizenship.
 
If you are not Luk you are certainly as stupid......

As I asked him if that is what he meant I didn't "ascribe" anything.

As they are essentially the same and no one is given citizenship you have failed on every level possible....

Good work!!!


The wet foot, dry foot policy is the name given to a consequence of the 1995 revision of the Cuban Adjustment Act of 1966 that essentially says that anyone who fled Cuba and entered the United States would be allowed to pursue residency a year later. After talks with the Cuban government, the Clinton administration came to an agreement with Cuba that it would stop admitting people intercepted in U.S. waters. Since then, in what has become known as the "Wet foot, Dry foot" policy, a Cuban caught on the waters between the two nations (with "wet feet") would summarily be sent home or to a third country. One who makes it to shore ("dry feet") gets a chance to remain in the United States, and later would qualify for expedited "legal permanent resident" status and eventually U.S. citizenship.

Yeah. I was not talking about that.
 
Yeah. I was not talking about that.

Wet/Dry: The government initiated the policy in 1995 as an amendment to the 1966 Cuban Adjustment Act that Congress passed

As you said you were talking about the CAA, and wet/Dry was the very latest amendment.... What exactly are you talking about?
 
The wet/dry is just the bureaucratic interpretation of when a Cuban refugee falls under the privileged status of the Cuban Adjustment Act, which is the basis for granting Cubans amnesty.

I am talking about ending the practice of granting amnesty for Cubans. One proposal is the Correcting Unfair Benefits for Aliens Act.
 
no the new Administration will just selectively enforce immigration as it suits his party's voter rolls. You're good with that right?
 
no the new Administration will just selectively enforce immigration as it suits his party's voter rolls. You're good with that right?

Actually I am talking about legislative action, and not about the unilateral actions of The Orangutang.

As far as I can tell Ryan, McConnell and The Orangutang are agreed on a few legislative priorities:

- Tax cuts for the wealthy
- Some form of healthcare insurance legislation reform (sic)
- Immigration reform

It would seem to me that amnesty for Cubans would end, in the overall immigration reform effort. Something like 30,000 border crossings in Texas last year were Cubans, not Mexicans. And all they do is walk up to a border patrol station and and say "I'm here!"
 
Actually I am talking about legislative action, and not about the unilateral actions of The Orangutang.

As far as I can tell Ryan, McConnell and The Orangutang are agreed on a few legislative priorities:

- Tax cuts for the wealthy
- Some form of healthcare insurance legislation reform (sic)
- Immigration reform

It would seem to me that amnesty for Cubans would end, in the overall immigration reform effort. Something like 30,000 border crossings in Texas last year were Cubans, not Mexicans. And all they do is walk up to a border patrol station and and say "I'm here!"

Referring to President Obama as a primate of any description is racist.

As far as taxes, who but the wealthy pay taxes? you cannot give a tax cut to the poor with the poor not only pay no taxes they get back more than they pay in taxes.

Since when is any one of the democratic party's persuasion cared what actual expenditures versus revenues are ? If you're willing to print money what possible difference does it make what do you print a little more money or a little less money and tax people left. Ask under guy. It's one of the few things he's right about.

You don't get to pray to Saint John Maynard Keynes when your guy is in office and claim the deficit spending is stimulative, and then it say that it is not with the other guy gets here. Try to be a little consistent in your foolishness.

Not that they have the stones to use the Harry Reid maneuver but immigration is whatever Republicans decide it is. 51% of the Senate gets to decide that yes we will let in an unlimited amount of Cubans and we will let an absolutely no Mexicans. They can write words in the exactly that way and it will stand up to a supreme court challenge
 
Last edited:
... and will the public policy that allows every Cuban that makes landfall in the US to be a citizen be reverted?



I don't get it.
What has changed to cause new policy.

Fidel hasn't ruled in years, or is this to do with obama buddying up to his brother
 
Get some sleep.

If you don't like actual answers to be snarky idiotic threads you start, then maybe you shouldn't start them.

It amuses me greatly the vocabulary you butthurt Clintonistas have adopted. You keep claiming that everybody else is whining and crying. We got nothing to cry about. God obviously came down from heaven interfered with the workings of man and produced an according to Hoyale miracle, Clinton lost. You're the one whining like an idiot about having a Eastern liberal as your president. You're going to like him better than I like him.
 
Last edited:
I don't get it.
What has changed to cause new policy.

Fidel hasn't ruled in years, or is this to do with obama buddying up to his brother

Well, for starters, there was a presidential election where building walls and immigration reform were pretty much the single most talked about public policy point by the President-elect.

Since the necessity of the "The Wall" is mostly based on people traipsing across the southern border with Mexico, and 30,000 of those people last year were Cuban, it seems like something to address in immigration reform.
 
If you don't like actual answers to be snarky idiotic threads you start, then maybe you shouldn't start them.

It amuses me greatly the vocabulary you butthurt Clintonistas have adopted. You keep claiming that everybody else is whining and crying. We got nothing to cry about. God obviously came down from heaven interfered with the workings of man and produced an according to Hoyale miracle, Clinton lost. You're the one whining like an idiot about having a Eastern liberal as your president. You're going to like him better than I like him.

LOL - FAHQUE!
 
Well, for starters, there was a presidential election where building walls and immigration reform were pretty much the single most talked about public policy point by the President-elect.

Since the necessity of the "The Wall" is mostly based on people traipsing across the southern border with Mexico, and 30,000 of those people last year were Cuban, it seems like something to address in immigration reform.

You don't seem to follow a logical line of reasoning do you? The policy on Cubans predates Obama and will more likely than not continue after Trump leaves office in 2025.

The policy is only Cuban specific in the sense that we understand humans who are returned to the island are subject to arrest torture and possible execution therefore by definition they're refugees. Doesn't matter if they happen to walk up to a wall between here and Mexico and seeing as how they are still Cuban, they're still going to be let in.

It doesn't matter how tall the wall is, short the wall ,is porous the wall is, or what the wall is made up if the policy says they come in, they come in.

And that's not primarily what this election was about. This election was about fuck you to people like you. This was especially fuck you to any party stupid enough to run Hillary Clinton as their candidate.

We know this because you also lost down-ballot races.

Which explains all the waaa waaa waaa that we hear out of you
 
LOL - FAHQUE!

I don't think those are tears of laughter.

Nice that you have to reach deep and borrow from Rob's bag of tricks. Neither he nor you seem aware of the fact that que is pronounced k.

Kind of funny since you love you some Mexicans don't you?
 
And here I thought Trump (orange orangutang...cool..lol) just had it in for Mexicans of any faith and Muslims from any country.

Just figured that the timing of this thread coincided with the death of Justin and Pierre's buddy and had something to do with that.
 
You don't seem to follow a logical line of reasoning do you? The policy on Cubans predates Obama and will more likely than not continue after Trump leaves office in 2025.


Which explains all the waaa waaa waaa that we hear out of you

Thousands of Cubans Heading to Texas, Welfare Benefits Await
Thousands of Cuban refugees are stranded in Costa Rica and are now being moved into Mexico so they can illegally cross into the United States. Once on American soil, Cubans receive automatic immigration status adjustment and full welfare benefits. Texas is becoming the epicenter of this influx of Cubans.

Breitbart

WTF? I thought this was something agreeable to the Alt-Right.
 
You should not confuse the village idiots with facts ,cos they knows what they knows .
 
It would seem like the era for preferential treatment for Cubans and their entry in the US should come to an end, no?

Correcting Unfair Benefits for Aliens Act is poised and ready to go.

Yea, it should be shit canned.

Actually I am talking about legislative action, and not about the unilateral actions of The Orangutang.

As far as I can tell Ryan, McConnell and The Orangutang are agreed on

That's racist and bigoted.

a few legislative priorities:

- Tax cuts for the wealthy
- Some form of healthcare insurance legislation reform (sic)
- Immigration reform

Yea......so?

Thousands of Cubans Heading to Texas, Welfare Benefits Await
Thousands of Cuban refugees are stranded in Costa Rica and are now being moved into Mexico so they can illegally cross into the United States. Once on American soil, Cubans receive automatic immigration status adjustment and full welfare benefits. Texas is becoming the epicenter of this influx of Cubans.

Breitbart

LOL that won't last long...

WTF? I thought this was something agreeable to the Alt-Right.

At what point did letting a bunch of immigrants in to suck up benefits we can't afford become and alt-right position? :confused:

That's something the neoLib/social justice twats push for.
 
Back
Top