VeraBad
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Sep 24, 2015
- Posts
- 1,321
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So...Clinton's foundation only gave 6% to charity. They're both scumbags. Buy a clue.
So...Clinton's foundation only gave 6% to charity. They're both scumbags. Buy a clue.
Well, Trump's spokesmodel is saying it, so it MUST be true.So...Clinton's foundation only gave 6% to charity. They're both scumbags. Buy a clue.
Come by and say hi.
Actually watchdog groups that aren't frothing nutcases with an axe to grind put that figure at 86%. Of course frothing Hillary-haters have apparently never seen a bullshit sandwich that they wouldn't cram down their gullets in one go.
Except that number is bullshit too. If you actually read what the 86% number signifies (the amount of dollars used in-house as opposed to actually contracting outside agencies or companies to do the actual "charity work".
Cue Doug Band's emails chastising Podesta for not putting a leash on Chelsea after she started working at the Clinton Foundation and starting asking questions, and it starts to fill in the dots on what kind of "in-house charity work" the Foundation was actually doing. You are aware that Chelsea's millions of dollars in salary is part of that 86% right? Along with Doug Band's millions? 'Course not, because St.Hillary is atleast better than the DrumpfenFuhrer!
Come by and say hi.
how did you get to become so mentally retarded? help me understand? drugs? huffing glue?
You have yet to give us any proof. What NBC paid her has zip to do with her foundation salary. No wonder you're always whining. You can't connect two dots to save your life.
Just disregard the Snow Mexican. He hates Hillary almost as much as Ishmael hates black folks.
Thanks for taking a break from your bedazzling to post(?) to my thread.
Here are the latest numbers.
http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-election-forecast/?ex_cid=2016-senate-forecast