LITEROTICA PODCAST
LIT CAMS (200 Free Tokens)ADULT TOYSVOD MOVIES

Donald Trump had a secret server that communicated exclusively with a Russian bank

Conager said:
So, what you're saying is that the DNC is full of people who are security risks and incompetent with technology?
Click to expand...

Not so much security, as this is all really low-level stuff that you partisan attackers have latched on to. (That C stands for "confidential," which, in Washington terms is one step above manufactured rumor on the security charts). Also, it was a minuscule number of e-mails in terms of working discussions and they were ones she received, not sent. All practically nothing for doing work anywhere in the government. But, sure, incompetent with technology. People in Hillary's age bracket aren't technology savvy. They have people to worry about that and those people just want to say yes and to please their masters.

You are really an idiotic idiologue vulture to act like this is just a DNC thing. It's in the RNC and all over the government. The technology--and hacking, in particular--is so new and the politicos so consumed by an entirely different world that they just haven't understood the vulnerability of the e-mail system. I went through this in the early Internet stage. We had whole secret operations going up on the Internet to exchange work protected only by not--they thought--having their URLs known by anyone else. They had no idea that browsers were parsing the content of their Internet pages and making it searchable. That was twenty years ago and it's depressing that the lesson wasn't absorbed, but it's not a DNC thing. It's everywhere.

You're just being idiotic to let your malicious partisanship not let you see it as a common problem. Clinton's instincts were good on having her own server. State's commo is a joke on protection (and indeed, it was hacked during her tenure as sec state and her server wasn't, as far as has been revealed yet). She asked NSA for support and they didn't give it to her and then, as she's done in the past, she just did it herself because it needed to be done and no one was helping her. And her people screwed it up because everyone else in the government was screwing it up too. It's only an issue because the vultures are after her for anything they can do to chip away at the Clintons.

Doing so doesn't help the health of this nation any damn bit.
 
Last edited:
One group of dipshits reads their websites and says, "AhhHA!!!!! THIS is fact!"

The other group of dipshits read their websites and say, "AhHA!!! THIS is fact!" - which, remarkably, is the exact opposite of the first group of dipshits' facts.

When the only fact is that dipshits can find support for whatever predisposition they have on the interwebs.


It's a lot like Climate Change where a bunch of dipshits reads something on the interweb and is suddenly an expert with facts known only to them.


None of you tards are privy to the inner workings of what's going on at the secret agencies looking into and monitoring this stuff.
 
BoyNextDoor said:
Case in point:

White Nationalist’s Pro-Trump Robocall: Evan McMullin Is Gay

William Johnson, a white-nationalist Trump supporter, is robo-calling Utahns claiming that Trump’s main competition in the state is a closeted homosexual.

Who gives a shit if Evan McMullin is gay? Homophobic Trump, low information voters - that is who.
Click to expand...

link?
 
sr71plt said:
Not so much security, as this is all really low-level stuff that you partisan attackers have latched on to. (That C stands for "confidential," which, in Washington terms is one step above manufactured rumor on the security charts). Also, it was a minuscule number of e-mails in terms of working discussions and they were ones she received, not sent. All practically nothing for doing work anywhere in the government. But, sure, incompetent with technology. People in Hillary's age bracket aren't technology savvy. They have people to worry about that and those people just want to say yes and to please their masters.

You are really an idiotic idiologue vulture to act like this is just a DNC thing. It's in the RNC and all over the government. The technology--and hacking, in particular--is so new and the politicos so consumed by an entirely different world that they just haven't understood the vulnerability of the e-mail system. I went through this in the early Internet stage. We had whole secret operations going up on the Internet to exchange work protected only by not--they thought--having their URLs known by anyone else. They had no idea that browsers were parsing the content of their Internet pages and making it searchable. That was twenty years ago and it's depressing that the lesson wasn't absorbed, but it's not a DNC thing. It's everywhere.

You're just being idiotic to let your malicious partisanship not let you see it as a common problem. Clinton's instincts were good on having her own server. State's commo is a joke on protection (and indeed, it was hacked during her tenure as sec state and her server wasn't, as far as has been revealed yet). She asked NSA for support and they didn't give it to her and then, as she's done in the past, she just did it herself because it needed to be done and no one was helping her. And her people screwed it up because everyone else in the government was screwing it up too. It's only an issue because the vultures are after her for anything they can do to chip away at the Clintons.

Doing so doesn't help the health of this nation any damn bit.
Click to expand...

"Her instincts were good?" when she decided to use her own server to get around the record-keeping that would happen on government servers never mind whether it is or isn't more secure it's illegal to take gov't docs off of Government servers.

I had forgotten that in between being one of the 40 or 50 people who ever flew a blackbird and being the point man for the entire intelligence community's takedown of bush that you also designed the communications systems at the state department.

You really are rather creative with your fiction. I will give you that.

Even Hillary's campaign is not claiming that the reason she had a server of her own was because government serviers are insecure and she was trying to increase security.

There was no encryption used at all. That's why we can read her emails.
 
Last edited:
sr71plt said:
You're kind of brown around the edges yourself. :D
Click to expand...

No I'm not because I don't say anything even remotely personal on forums. Nobody knows who I am, what I do, where I live, how massive my abnormally large penis is or what kind of car I drive.
You on the other hand have gone out of your way to try and get people to believe lots of outrageous things about yourself, none of which are true.
I don't care for calling people out like this but with you I feel the need because I just happen to know the truth about you and I don't like your brand of bullshit.
I probably won't share anything so no worries. But then maybe I will. Guess we'll have to wait and see.
 
Conager said:
I had forgotten that in between being one of the 40 or 50 people who ever flew a blackbird and being the point man for the entire intelligence community's takedown of bush that you also designed the communications systems at the state department.
Click to expand...

The instincts to protect her communications above what State communications provided were what was good--not the delivery. Because of the relentless attacking on her for thirty years, she, yes, has become overly secretive. That's completely understandable under the circumstances. And, again, the only thing that puts what she's done with e-mails above any one else in the government is you vultures.

You (and others) can't abide anyone having a more interesting life than you have had, can you? You (and others) exaggerate anything I have revealed of my background to such a ridiculous degree that I, knowing what my life as been and knowing you can't do a damn think about what it was, I just laugh at you. I laugh also that you snuffle around looking for whatever you can find on my background, when I don't give a shit who you are and how mediocre your life is. It's sort of amusing to know that your lives have been so small that you can't abide anyone having had a more interesting one. I don't plug my background in these discussions. It's something you (and others) have to go to because you know so little about the topic being discussed that you have to find something irrelevant to attack.

Point out where I claimed to have a damn thing to do with State Department communications--other than working in embassies and knowing that using State commo was pretty much identical to taking out an ad in the local paper.

And perhaps we should go back to you talking about SR71s going into battle. :rolleyes:

Have you checked out the Michael Scheuer discussion yet? (Of course not. It's all above your knowledge base.) He's your kind of guy--a Trump dupe now and has called for the assassination of Obama.
 
Last edited:
To be charitable, Conager, I guess one reason you insist on misrepresenting what I post is that you know so little about the topics. You have nothing constructive to contribute here (or, probably, in life, which is why you're such an angry little man). So, no need to read you anymore.
 
nerfhearder said:
Not that kind of personal, moron.
Click to expand...

Oh, then it was a "Nerf can do it but SR71 can't do the same thing in response" thing. Uh OK, got your drift now. :rolleyes:

If you're up to straining your brain, you might want to reconsider who the "moron" was (with, I guess, "moron" not being a personal attack in your book, either. :D)
 
Last edited:
sr71plt said:
Oh, then it was a "Nerf can do it but SR71 can't do the same thing in response" thing. Uh OK, got your drift now. :rolleyes:

If you're up to straining your brain, you might want to reconsider who the "moron" was (with, I guess, "moron" not being a personal attack in your book, either. :D)
Click to expand...

No, the moron still applies because you can't seem to comprehend that in my post "personal" obviously meant personal information since I followed it up with examples of personal information. I guess that was too subtle for you.
If I were you I'd tread pretty lightly with me but I'm not you so I guess we'll just see how it goes.
 
I guess the pissing match keeps the thread at the top of the page. Carry on.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

SissyBrandi19
Summer 2025 Reading List Challenge!!!
Replies
2
Views
303
SissyBrandi19
SissyBrandi19
leatherstocking
Test post for sharing writing
Replies
2
Views
376
Lifestyle66
L
J
Another Deirdre SOS! With another story.
Replies
4
Views
687
mjallen1808
M
Alex_Undercover
"Almost A Movie Night" (A true sex story)
Replies
4
Views
3K
BDA73
BDA73
B
The following, while related to the election, transcends politics - it is a message of hope for all who seek unity and peace. Plus, there's a coupon.
Replies
7
Views
937
PaxNurgle
P
Back
Top