Whats A Porn Masterpiece?

hi

Porn masterpiece should have normal-anal-bdsm-bareback-and explicit details long enough- vile to some extent. story to thrill the reader and climax him/her just before the story ends
 
I answered your question so what's the problem?

Anyway, I thought you had me on ignore or at least that's what you said in an earlier thread. Make up you mind.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Are you saying you cant discriminate, or are you saying all are equal?

I'm asking, what's your criteria for "no". And what's TXrad's criteria for "yes".

Both blanket statements, therefore both wrong, I think.

Define "masterpiece" - hmmm, a thread ran on this topic a coupla weeks or a month or so ago....

And, I guess, define "porn". These days, I'm fucked if I know what it is, let alone whether it's good or not. So maybe I can't discriminate.
 
I'm asking, what's your criteria for "no". And what's TXrad's criteria for "yes".

Both blanket statements, therefore both wrong, I think.

Define "masterpiece" - hmmm, a thread ran on this topic a coupla weeks or a month or so ago....

And, I guess, define "porn". These days, I'm fucked if I know what it is, let alone whether it's good or not. So maybe I can't discriminate.

My criteria for yes is something that stands the test of time. Does it have to be good? Since most of the readers here are reading one handed, that is neither here nor there. If it gets them off then it is good, if not.... they go on to something else.

"Masterpiece" is in the eyes of the beholder.

Porn, graphic with nothing left to the imagination. Erotica, something less than graphic but still porn like in substance.
 
I'm asking, what's your criteria for "no". And what's TXrad's criteria for "yes".

Both blanket statements, therefore both wrong, I think.

Define "masterpiece" - hmmm, a thread ran on this topic a coupla weeks or a month or so ago....

And, I guess, define "porn". These days, I'm fucked if I know what it is, let alone whether it's good or not. So maybe I can't discriminate.

You cant find a porn masterpiece at LIT. My proof. Prove me wrong. You cant find one that's a big WOW. Few are impressive. But link your masterworks and show me for a fool.
 
You cant find a porn masterpiece at LIT. My proof. Prove me wrong. You cant find one that's a big WOW. Few are impressive. But link your masterworks and show me for a fool.

Bound

You asked for it. 912,517 views, 4132 votes, a score of 4.73. 169 comments. And that is in BDSM.
 
Criteria is plural.

Criterion is singular.

I.e. one criterion, many criteria.

;)
 
If it is a masterpiece, it's not porn.

It's erotica.

Historically, a masterpiece is the work that you submit to your guild to gain status as a Master.

Given that definition I think there have been many "porn" masterpieces. TxRad may have named a few. In the history of written erotica there have been more than a few. If I were to look for modern masterpieces I might look here. Where else would be better?

I think that Ogg is right,though. When otherwise pornographic work exceeds normal expectations then it isn't considered to be porn.

My favorite example is the 1980-ish movie "Nothing to Hide," which was produced as the sequel to "Talk Dirty to Me." The movie is more romantic than pornographic, but the sex is graphic.

My reaction on watching "Nothing to Hide" was 'that's not porn.'

Someone assembled a list of moves you should watch before you decide that all porn is shit and for "Nothing to Hide" he inserted the parenthetic question "But then, Is it really porn?"

Really, no. It isn't. Despite the pornographic content it is a touching story, played out by some of the best actors from the golden age of porn.

Maybe it's erotica. Maybe there are lots of stories like that in the archives here.
 
Historically, a masterpiece is the work that you submit to your guild to gain status as a Master.

Given that definition I think there have been many "porn" masterpieces. TxRad may have named a few. In the history of written erotica there have been more than a few. If I were to look for modern masterpieces I might look here. Where else would be better?

I think that Ogg is right,though. When otherwise pornographic work exceeds normal expectations then it isn't considered to be porn.

My favorite example is the 1980-ish movie "Nothing to Hide," which was produced as the sequel to "Talk Dirty to Me." The movie is more romantic than pornographic, but the sex is graphic.

My reaction on watching "Nothing to Hide" was 'that's not porn.'

Someone assembled a list of moves you should watch before you decide that all porn is shit and for "Nothing to Hide" he inserted the parenthetic question "But then, Is it really porn?"

Really, no. It isn't. Despite the pornographic content it is a touching story, played out by some of the best actors from the golden age of porn.

Maybe it's erotica. Maybe there are lots of stories like that in the archives here.

I make battalions of new friends every time I say it, but better writing exists plenty of other places. LIT simply has a wealth of mediocre stuff. Call a spade a spade.
 
I make battalions of new friends every time I say it, but better writing exists plenty of other places. LIT simply has a wealth of mediocre stuff. Call a spade a spade.

It also has a wealth of great stuff. You seem to have a very limited view of what is good and what is not. If it doesn't fit your limited criteria then it is not good.
 
I make battalions of new friends every time I say it, but better writing exists plenty of other places. LIT simply has a wealth of mediocre stuff. Call a spade a spade.

Okay, you're right about a wealth of mediocre stuff. But who's gonna shift through all that to find the gems? It exists, until you can prove that it doesn't.
A masterpiece would be something that many people specialized in that field agree that the piece is something extraordinary. It's a kind of agreement- 'We all agree this story not only encompasses everything all erotica/porn should strive for but also has something extra.'
Personal preference is something different. Anyone can dislike a masterpiece.
So call up all those authors, and make them decide.
 
Okay, you're right about a wealth of mediocre stuff. But who's gonna shift through all that to find the gems? It exists, until you can prove that it doesn't.
A masterpiece would be something that many people specialized in that field agree that the piece is something extraordinary. It's a kind of agreement- 'We all agree this story not only encompasses everything all erotica/porn should strive for but also has something extra.'
Personal preference is something different. Anyone can dislike a masterpiece.
So call up all those authors, and make them decide.

I say, a masterpiece demonstrates competence of the art and science of any craft, plus high performance elegance.

So far no one has offered any LIT masterpiece to defeat my thesis. Prove me wrong.

Over the years I've lauded GLYNNDAH, TIO, and HOLLIDAY1960 as superior LIT writers (all 3 are on my shit list), regardless of the low esteem I have for them they write well. But none are PILOT. Who is!
 
If it is a masterpiece, it's not porn.

It's erotica.

I totally agree, as in Edith Wharton's Age of Innocence, Flaubert's Madam Bovary, Henry Miller's Tropic of Cancer, and 9 1/2 weeks by Elizabeth McNeill.

Just to name a select few.
 
Back
Top