Donald Trump had a secret server that communicated exclusively with a Russian bank

Oh, is that a smoking gun? Closest thing you've been able to produce so far.
 
You mean like in 2008 when Bush asked the Saudis to lower the price of oil in time for the election? That sort of meddling?

Sure. Just like that.

or another really good example was all of illegal money bundled from the Chinese to reelect mr. Rodham Clinton
 
Trump tells the world that Russia should hack Clinton. Russia hacks Clinton. Trump doesn't even say "oops".
 
Trump tells the world that Russia should hack Clinton. Russia hacks Clinton. Trump doesn't even say "oops".

Nobody has given a rational basis for believing Russia is behind this, other than making vague accusations and asking the public to trust the US intelligence community. And if you completely trust intelligence officials they think you're an idiot and for good reason.
 
You mean like in 2008 when Bush asked the Saudis to lower the price of oil in time for the election? That sort of meddling?

No I mean all the money they have thrown at Clinton that you'll dance around eternally and refuse to acknowledge.

Oh, is that a smoking gun? Closest thing you've been able to produce so far.

Did you not read any of the links I've given you?

Of course not, wouldn't want to read the part of the statement from the FBI where Comey said he found fuck tons of classified shit on her private electronic devices now would you? :D

Trump tells the world that Russia should hack Clinton. Russia hacks Clinton. Trump doesn't even say "oops".

Why should he?

Has Hillary apologized for all the help from foreign interests that she gets?

Are you not a globalist 'liberal' Democrat who supports Clinton??

I thought you were in favor of a borderless, inclusive, progressive way of doing things.....:confused:

I didn't think you were so xenophobic.

Careful you don't sound like a nationalist in response because all you're (D) buddies will turn on your fuckin' ass in a heartbeat.

Not even the most sacred of demographics within (D)'s identity politics, a black woman, is safe if they don't toe that line.


Why? Progress that's why.....;)
http://truthfeed.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/HOMELESS-WOMAN-GUARDS-TRUMP-STAR-01-800x416.jpg
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/mFOfmzlXLBk/maxresdefault.jpg
 
Last edited:
Nobody has given a rational basis for believing Russia is behind this, other than making vague accusations and asking the public to trust the US intelligence community. And if you completely trust intelligence officials they think you're an idiot and for good reason.
It isn't the US intelligence community that's saying the Russians are involved. They won't do that, because it strains relations between the governments.

It's private cybersecurity companies examining the evidence and comparing it with past hacks and known bad actors, who come to the conclusion that Russia is involved.

https://www.wired.com/2016/07/heres-know-russia-dnc-hack/
 
No I mean all the money they have thrown at Clinton that you'll dance around eternally and refuse to acknowledge.



Did you not read any of the links I've given you?

Of course not, wouldn't want to read the part of the statement from the FBI where Comey said he found fuck tons of classified shit on her private electronic devices now would you? :D



Why should he?

Has Hillary apologized for all the help from foreign interests that she gets?

Are you not a globalist 'liberal' Democrat who supports Clinton??

I thought you were in favor of a borderless, inclusive, progressive way of doing things.....:confused:

I didn't think you were so xenophobic.

Careful you don't sound like a nationalist in response because all you're (D) buddies will turn on your fuckin' ass in a heartbeat.

Not even the most sacred of demographics within (D)'s identity politics, a black woman, is safe if they don't toe that line.


Why? Progress that's why.....;)
http://truthfeed.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/HOMELESS-WOMAN-GUARDS-TRUMP-STAR-01-800x416.jpg
https://i.ytimg.com/vi/mFOfmzlXLBk/maxresdefault.jpg
See, you keep trying hard, but coming up short with that smoking gun.

Do you think that contributions to the Clinton Foundation are being used to fund Hillary's campaign? That would be a very illegal thing for her to do. Any evidence of that would be damning. Show me, if you have some.
 
It isn't the US intelligence community that's saying the Russians are involved. They won't do that, because it strains relations between the governments.

It's private cybersecurity companies examining the evidence and comparing it with past hacks and known bad actors, who come to the conclusion that Russia is involved.

https://www.wired.com/2016/07/heres-know-russia-dnc-hack/

So... we don't want to strain relations with the Russians so we'll just have one of our major presidential candidate's campaigns accuse them openly and publicly?

Let me guess these private security companies have been hired by the DNC to plug holes. . .

. . .in reality?
 
So... we don't want to strain relations with the Russians so we'll just have one of our major presidential candidate's campaigns accuse them openly and publicly?

Let me guess these private security companies have been hired by the DNC to plug holes. . .

. . .in reality?
Last time I checked, the DNC was not part of the US government.
 
Trump tells the world that Russia should hack Clinton. Russia hacks Clinton. Trump doesn't even say "oops".

Except Russia didn't hack Clinton, an American did. He even tweeted a teaser lol

It isn't the US intelligence community that's saying the Russians are involved. They won't do that, because it strains relations between the governments.

It's private cybersecurity companies examining the evidence and comparing it with past hacks and known bad actors, who come to the conclusion that Russia is involved.

https://www.wired.com/2016/07/heres-know-russia-dnc-hack/

When Hillary can't lie her way out of another lie, she points the finger at Russia. No wonder she was such a disaster as Suckretary of State.

In debate #3 Hillary said 17 US intelligence agencies said Russia did. #serialliar
 
Last time I checked, the DNC was not part of the US government.

Last I checked Hillary Clinton was the nominee of the DNC. She is now the de facto head of the DNC.

Last I checked Hillary was a recent member of this administration. Specifically the Secretary of State who should be inordinately concerned with such things as offending Russia.

Last I checked she was applying for the job of running the government.

So it's a bad idea to offend the Russians but as long as you're just doing it to get the job where you're then going to make nice to Russians it's okay?

Your ability to endlessly compartmentalize is rather amusing.

almost like one of those Nesting Russian dolls.

Coincidence?
 
So Trump and the Russians are cozy cozy and it's only the DNC's e-mails that were hacked and you aren't connecting any dots. I wouldn't suggest that most of you folks bother to apply for jobs in foreign policy analysis. :rolleyes:
 
So Trump and the Russians are cozy cozy and it's only the DNC's e-mails that were hacked and you aren't connecting any dots. I wouldn't suggest that most of you folks bother to apply for jobs in foreign policy analysis. :rolleyes:

So, what you're saying is that the DNC is full of people who are security risks and incompetent with technology?
 
See, you keep trying hard, but coming up short with that smoking gun.

I'm not trying, I'm just pointing out fact.

Do you think that contributions to the Clinton Foundation are being used to fund Hillary's campaign?

Did I say they were?

Who knows what they are used for.....does it even matter?

That would be a very illegal thing for her to do.

NOTHING is illegal thing for her to do.

She shit all over national security laws and didn't even get FINED!

Any evidence of that would be damning.

No it wouldn't.

The FBI would come out and say "Yep, she took hundreds of millions and broke about 1200 federal laws. But we reccomend NO charges at this time....because reasons."

Then HRC's home girl, AG Lynch, would just hand out some more immunity deals and you would consider her exonerated.

You know how I know that's what you would do?

You've already done it once this year. :D
 
So it's a bad idea to offend the Russians but as long as you're just doing it to get the job where you're then going to make nice to Russians, AND a Democrat, it's okay?

No no no....you forgot a key element in that, but I corrected and highlighted it for you.

If an (R) does that he's an irrational lunatic trying to start WWIII. ;)
 
Couldn't find a smoking gun, then?

Define smoking gun....

And for what?

Also you can't even admit she misspoke when she said she would raise taxes on the middle class with video and numerous sources from both sides of the partisans pissing contest verifying it.

You just ignored it, altered the quote and pretended it never happened.

So I find it hard you would consider ANYTHING painting Clinton as anything less than perfection on Earth as a smoking gun.
 
Last edited:
It isn't the US intelligence community that's saying the Russians are involved. They won't do that, because it strains relations between the governments.

It's private cybersecurity companies examining the evidence and comparing it with past hacks and known bad actors, who come to the conclusion that Russia is involved.

https://www.wired.com/2016/07/heres-know-russia-dnc-hack/

If you can't recognize that Wired piece is a sloppily sourced hit piece on Assange, i.e. propaganda most likely fed to Wired by people in the Clinton network, you need to reflect on that.
 
Utterly pathetic. Is this what the Clintons have to sink to to 'win' a rigged election?
 
Back
Top