The FBI and Clinton

NOIRTRASH

Literotica Guru
Joined
Aug 22, 2015
Posts
10,580
Looks like Comey got a heads up from law enforcement after they found evidence on Weiners laptop. LE is looking for porn or underage material. But Obama wont authorize the FBI to legally look at the emails. So Hillary knows Comey cant comment on what LE found, but he knows whats there.
 
can't or Kant

Weiner's or wieners

Comey has the opportunity to do damage control, but it is too late.
 
Clinton wants the newly discovered e-mails released. Simple, tell Huma to release them.
 
Clinton wants the newly discovered e-mails released. Simple, tell Huma to release them.

It is absolutely true that Huma can release these emails. Clinton calling for the FBI to release them is just a fig leaf.

She knows the FBI cannot release them. Her calling for them to be released by the FBI is simply her trying to give the illusion of transparency. As per usual.
 
THE FBI has the computer, so Huma cant release what she aint got.

The FBI had 2 investigations: one for the server, and one for the Clinton Foundation. People forget the Foundation investigation is still open.

New York Police discovered the emails and notified the FBI, Agents in New York saw the emails and told Comey what they are.

Comey told Loretta Lynch, to get a warrant for the emails, she refused to save Hillarys ass.

And here we are pretending its nuthin.
 
"Investigators believe it's likely the newly recovered trove will include emails that were deleted from the Clinton server before the FBI took possession of it as part of that earlier investigation."

BOOM
 
"Investigators believe it's likely the newly recovered trove will include emails that were deleted from the Clinton server before the FBI took possession of it as part of that earlier investigation."

BOOM

Bullshit!

We've had several board Dems already inform us with the truth; they've read all of those emails and there is nothing from Hillary to Huma.

You sir, are a partisan LIAR!!!

(Which is not ot be confused with a congenital liar.)
 
According to the article on drudge, the investigators working on weiner pedo investigation saw thousands of Huma's emails on weiner laptop. While they did not open them because they felt a search warrant was needed (they fell under the closed separate investigation), the subject headers they read were enough to prompt their bringing it to Comey's attention.

Wanna bet there are copies from the deleted 33,000 there? All you need is 1 for evidence.
 
According to the article on drudge, the investigators working on weiner pedo investigation saw thousands of Huma's emails on weiner laptop. While they did not open them because they felt a search warrant was needed (they fell under the closed separate investigation), the subject headers they read were enough to prompt their bringing it to Comey's attention.

Wanna bet there are copies from the deleted 33,000 there? All you need is 1 for evidence.

Bullshit!

We've had several board Dems already inform us with the truth; they've read all of those emails and there is nothing from Hillary to Huma.

You sir, are a partisan LIAR!!!

(Which is not ot be confused with a congenital liar.)

You're just a Republican thinking that he has crossed the Rubicon in this election.

:mad:

She's still going to win you damned, dirty misogynist!
 
According to the article on drudge, the investigators working on weiner pedo investigation saw thousands of Huma's emails on weiner laptop. While they did not open them because they felt a search warrant was needed (they fell under the closed separate investigation), the subject headers they read were enough to prompt their bringing it to Comey's attention.

Wanna bet there are copies from the deleted 33,000 there? All you need is 1 for evidence.

Their presense is more than enough for a warrant.

If they even need one. When they had a warrant for wieners laptop anything that they stumble across while they're in wieners laptop is probably covered because it's more or less in plain sight that's like saying they came into that household looking for a specific stolen article and found a different stolen articles sitting in plain view on the table.

They already have a pre-existing warrant for every device that Houma used. The fact that she didn't disclose that she used her husband's laptop doesn't change the fact that it's a device that she used.

What's really interesting here is Huma was granted immunity. So for them to worry about whether they do or don't have a warrant in this case suggests that they anticipate that they might need to pierce Huma's immunity.
 
Their presense is more than enough for a warrant.

If they even need one. When they had a warrant for wieners laptop anything that they stumble across while they're in wieners laptop is probably covered because it's more or less in plain sight that's like saying they came into that household looking for a specific stolen article and found a different stolen articles sitting in plain view on the table.

They already have a pre-existing warrant for every device that Houma used. The fact that she didn't disclose that she used her husband's laptop doesn't change the fact that it's a device that she used.

What's really interesting here is Huma was granted immunity. So for them to worry about whether they do or don't have a warrant in this case suggests that they anticipate that they might need to pierce Huma's immunity.

The New York cops found them and let the FBI look over their shoulfers at the content. The cops are after kiddie porn. Obama wont authorize the federal warrant.
 
The New York cops found them and let the FBI look over their shoulfers at the content. The cops are after kiddie porn. Obama wont authorize the federal warrant.

If any law enforcement officer or really for that matter a private citizen stumbles across evidence that shows that a federal crime has been committed that evidence is admissible. Now the fact that the feds aren't interested in everything that might be a federal case is a whole different matter.

For the justice department to say they aren't interested in these emails can't look anything but partisan.

It kind of makes sense though if as you say the NYPD had a look, Comey can't risk that leaking ahead of him admitting they exist.
 
They'll have to go to 8/9th of the Supreme Court for a decision on the warrant.
 
If any law enforcement officer or really for that matter a private citizen stumbles across evidence that shows that a federal crime has been committed that evidence is admissible. Now the fact that the feds aren't interested in everything that might be a federal case is a whole different matter.

For the justice department to say they aren't interested in these emails can't look anything but partisan.

It kind of makes sense though if as you say the NYPD had a look, Comey can't risk that leaking ahead of him admitting they exist.

Then Hillary knows she should be screaming at Obama to reveal the emails. All he has to do is tell Comey, do it.
 
Back
Top