Who Will You Blame When Hrc Loses?
- Thread starter NOIRTRASH
- Start date
Ubiquitious_too
Innocent as Snow White
- Joined
- Oct 4, 2015
- Posts
- 2,803
Kool- Aid?
You mean all the liberals who are ignoring the Wikileaks releases?
Rather uneducated if they ignore them, I'd say.
Ubiquitious_too
Innocent as Snow White
- Joined
- Oct 4, 2015
- Posts
- 2,803
Nice EDIT there sr7plt...
you removed the GUTS of your post.
you removed the GUTS of your post.
BoyNextDoor
I hate liars
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2010
- Posts
- 14,158
Like what? What is being ignored in the Wikileaks releases?
Out of curiosity, does it bother you at all that the Russians hacked the emails and are releasing them to fuck with America?
Adre
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2012
- Posts
- 23,913
I have yet to see anything even mildly surprising in these leaked items. October surprise my ass.
Setanta84
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Jul 12, 2010
- Posts
- 1,301
There is absolutely no evidence the Russians are the source of the leaks. There is insinuation from "unnamed intelligence sources" and statements from officials that it is "consistent" with Russian involvement. If you've paid attention to how the government lies about matters of foreign policy and war over the last 30 years and those don't raise red flags for you, there is a problem.
The NSA whistleblower who went to the press about what Snowden ultimately leaked proof of a year later has gone on record saying he believes the source is US intelligence.
John Podesta generally being shit at data security is also a big candidate for the source of the leaks. When you leave your email-linked smartphone in the back of a cab with a password like "p@ssw0rd," it wouldn't take the Kremlin to get hold of your data.
And on what is being ignored about Wikileaks--it's the gist of your post. Most Democratic diehards are internalizing and repeating the New McCarthyism of the Clinton campaign without asking questions or looking at the leaks themselves. If the content is real--and ample evidence points to it being real and absolutely no evidence points to it being doctored--who in the fuck cares where it came from?
Setanta84
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Jul 12, 2010
- Posts
- 1,301
If you think hard evidence that Clinton flagrantly broke campaign finance law, lied to the FBI and State during the investigation, cheated like mad during the primary, and was behind the wall-to-wall free media coverage that elevated Trump aren't newsworthy items, you have a strange idea of what is newsworthy.
Hashfag45
Loves Spam
- Joined
- Oct 25, 2016
- Posts
- 308
Which emails should we be worried about? Surely you've read them all and can point me to some.
sr71plt
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2006
- Posts
- 51,872
You live in your own little dreamworld, don't you? I didn't bother to read further.
Wrong Element
Sentient Onion
- Joined
- May 5, 2002
- Posts
- 24,909
Setanta84
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Jul 12, 2010
- Posts
- 1,301
This falls apart the second you reflect that they go live on the site prior to being announced on the Twitter feed. Otherwise, you'd publicizing a dead link. All this shows is RT America has access to the internet and Wikileaks' social media team doesn't update their feed the second new content is on the site. But people just don't think. They see somebody they like or trust post it and just roll with it without question. It's one of many reasons I despair for this country.
*professorx*
KnowledgeSHOULDbeSHARED
- Joined
- Oct 15, 2005
- Posts
- 5,734
who has time to blame ?/////////////////its party time when HITLERy loses
sr71plt
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2006
- Posts
- 51,872
UnderMyKilt
Been there,done that
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2004
- Posts
- 1,254
Unfortunately, she will not lose and I will blame the 44% of Republican primary voters who were stupid enough to support Donald Trump, as well as the idiot Trump himself, for her victory. We had the absolute weakest Democratic candidate in decades and they managed to nominate the GOP candidate least likely to defeat her.
Contrary to what I hear Trump supporter say, over and over again, he did not win the nomination with a "majority of Republican primary voters". He had only 44% with the other 56% basically voting for "anyone but Trump". In case you have a problem with the math or the definitions, look up "majority" and "plurality".
Had the field not been so spread out at the start, with 16 GOP primary candidates, Trump wouldn't have been able to get the nomination.
Unfortunately Trumps petulant and childish antics as of late, make it highly likely that the GOP will not only fail to take the Presidency, but will almost certainly lose the Senate and perhaps the House as well.
Congratulations !!
...and BTW, for the others, the Wikileaks documents, regardless of their source, are not the most damning evidence of Hillary Clinton's corruption.
Her willful, and intentional, use of a private email server in order to evade public records laws and Freedom of Information Act requests, as well as her criminal mishandling of classified documents is, and should be, the story but it gets even less coverage than the Wikileaks releases.
As a retired peace officer, I'm ashamed at the politicization of the Justice Department and the FBI (like all of the other federal agencies under Obama...including the IRS) and their failure to indict her for her crimes. The depth of her deception, and criminal intent, is more than apparent in recent releases of investigative documents and emails obtained through FOIA requests, bolstered by lawsuits and court orders, via Judicial Watch. In recent responses to interrogatories, under oath an under court order, she (her attorneys) objected to all 25 questions and she responded to 21 of them with "I don't recall". Emails, which the FBI had, and which were obtained through FOIA suits, revealed the depth of some of her lies as well as those of her minions. How this didn't result in an indictment is beyond me.
Last edited:
AnnieBonneau
Loves Spam
- Joined
- Feb 22, 2015
- Posts
- 386
stupid, racist voters like you
dale124
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2012
- Posts
- 595
Probably the loud voices of those who throw the word "racist" at anyone they disagree with, even when race hasn't been mentioned previously in the discussion. Such name-calling tends to sour people like me because it doesn't advance the discussion.
Like I've said before, I think Trump is a Democratic plant in the Republican ranks, chosen specifically to insure Clinton would win. Why else does he shoot himself in the foot every time he seems to close the gap with Hillary?
Voter fraud? That's usually the dominion of the Democrats. Most notably the Daley Political Machine in Chicago. Disenfranchisement? That dates back to southern Democrats creating the KKK to terrorize southern blacks into not voting. And when that didn't work, southern Democrats created pole taxes and literacy tests as roadblocks to keep blacks from voting. Republicans tried to stop those tactics (unsuccessfully) with the Lodge Bill of 1890. It wasn't until the 1964 Civil Rights Act that those practices by southern Democrats were put to rest. And only after a long filibuster by southern Democratic Senators Richard Russell (D-GA), Strom Thurmond (D-SC), and Robert Byrd (D-W.Va.). Democrats always take credit for the passage of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, yet a higher percentage of Republicans than Democrats voted for the bill in BOTH houses of Congress. The only real credit the Democrats can claim is that a Democratic president (JFK) called for the creation of the bill and a Democratic president (LBJ) signed the bill into law. Most the heavy lifting was done by my hometown senator, Everett Dirksen (R-Ill).
As a retired soldier, I won't even go into the long history of the Democrats trying to disenfranchise overseas service members through tactics of disallowing their absentee ballots on every possible technicality they could think of. All because the military has traditionally voted Republican. That always left a sour taste in my mouth, since I spent more time overseas than stateside. Always wondering if my Democrat controlled state would find an excuse to disallow my absentee vote.
And yet, with their long history of disenfranchising blacks and overseas military, the Democrats have the gall to hint that voter IDs are a Republican attempt to disenfranchise those same blacks. Which I find hilarious.
But seriously, if Trump were to win (heaven forbid), it could be because of the independents, tired of professional politicians from both parties, who chose him merely because he ISN'T a professional politician.
The truth? I really don't want to see either of these two clowns in the White House.
Like I've said before, I think Trump is a Democratic plant in the Republican ranks, chosen specifically to insure Clinton would win. Why else does he shoot himself in the foot every time he seems to close the gap with Hillary?
Voter fraud? That's usually the dominion of the Democrats. Most notably the Daley Political Machine in Chicago. Disenfranchisement? That dates back to southern Democrats creating the KKK to terrorize southern blacks into not voting. And when that didn't work, southern Democrats created pole taxes and literacy tests as roadblocks to keep blacks from voting. Republicans tried to stop those tactics (unsuccessfully) with the Lodge Bill of 1890. It wasn't until the 1964 Civil Rights Act that those practices by southern Democrats were put to rest. And only after a long filibuster by southern Democratic Senators Richard Russell (D-GA), Strom Thurmond (D-SC), and Robert Byrd (D-W.Va.). Democrats always take credit for the passage of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, yet a higher percentage of Republicans than Democrats voted for the bill in BOTH houses of Congress. The only real credit the Democrats can claim is that a Democratic president (JFK) called for the creation of the bill and a Democratic president (LBJ) signed the bill into law. Most the heavy lifting was done by my hometown senator, Everett Dirksen (R-Ill).
As a retired soldier, I won't even go into the long history of the Democrats trying to disenfranchise overseas service members through tactics of disallowing their absentee ballots on every possible technicality they could think of. All because the military has traditionally voted Republican. That always left a sour taste in my mouth, since I spent more time overseas than stateside. Always wondering if my Democrat controlled state would find an excuse to disallow my absentee vote.
And yet, with their long history of disenfranchising blacks and overseas military, the Democrats have the gall to hint that voter IDs are a Republican attempt to disenfranchise those same blacks. Which I find hilarious.
But seriously, if Trump were to win (heaven forbid), it could be because of the independents, tired of professional politicians from both parties, who chose him merely because he ISN'T a professional politician.
The truth? I really don't want to see either of these two clowns in the White House.
snugglestruggle
...
- Joined
- Oct 1, 2011
- Posts
- 7,373
Russia did this, Russia did that. Russia is all powerful.
The NSA has all her deleted emails , how did they get them? Did the Russians send them a copy out of courtesy? You're as big a (D) shill as Rory or Sr71plt and that's saying a lot.
sr71plt
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2006
- Posts
- 51,872
Russia did this, Russia did that. Russia is all powerful.
You're as big a (D) shill as Rory or Sr71plt and that's saying a lot.
Are you taking your pay in rubles or euros--or maybe photops with Mr. Trump?
Similar threads
