‘Calibration Error’ Changes GOP Votes To Dem In Illinois County…
- Thread starter xbb
- Start date
Darbhinder
Anti-Paki E is my 2nd
- Joined
- May 3, 2016
- Posts
- 1,397
Whiny jew fag. You lose, AGAIN!
snugglestruggle
...
- Joined
- Oct 1, 2011
- Posts
- 7,373
Colonel Hogan
Madness
- Joined
- Sep 16, 2005
- Posts
- 18,372
No. Evidence of massive vote tampering or fraud would indicate someone is trying to rig the election. You don't rig a national election with a "little bit of fraud" when millions of votes are being cast in all 50 states. You don't even rig an election in the key major electoral states with a "little bit of fraud." You need lots and lots of fraud on an unprecedented scale to make certain you are going to pull the caper off. That's not to say some people aren't going to try it. Some clowns will do it just for the bragging rights of telling their buddies that they "voted twice." But those routine and isolated incidents don't reflect an organized attempt by a political party to "rig" an election.
But at this point, rigging an election against Donald Trump would be like breaking into a hospice care facility and cutting the oxygen and IV tubes of the most severely terminally ill patients. It's hardly worth the effort.
underguy1
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2005
- Posts
- 2,857
No. Evidence of massive vote tampering or fraud would indicate someone is trying to rig the election. You don't rig a national election with a "little bit of fraud" when millions of votes are being cast in all 50 states. You don't even rig an election in the key major electoral states with a "little bit of fraud." You need lots and lots of fraud on an unprecedented scale to make certain you are going to pull the caper off. That's not to say some people aren't going to try it. Some clowns will do it just for the bragging rights of telling their buddies that they "voted twice." But those routine and isolated incidents don't reflect an organized attempt by a political party to "rig" an election.
But at this point, rigging an election against Donald Trump would be like breaking into a hospice care facility and cutting the oxygen and IV tubes of the most severely terminally ill patients. It's hardly worth the effort.
Except that 2000 and 2004 happened. So it isn't unprecedented.
snugglestruggle
...
- Joined
- Oct 1, 2011
- Posts
- 7,373
I didn't say massive, the effect is cumulative. Have enough Programming
"irregularities" in machines here, lawsuits to extend early voting there,4 million dead people still registered, letting illegals vote, giving results of early voting etc... and the claim is valid.
It doesn't take much to swing an election, just a bit of fraud in key districts can swing a state one way or another. You cant have fraud on a wide scale national level because every state runs it's own elections. You focus on fraud in 3 or 4 swing states. Ohio, Penn, FL,NC for instance.
"irregularities" in machines here, lawsuits to extend early voting there,4 million dead people still registered, letting illegals vote, giving results of early voting etc... and the claim is valid.
It doesn't take much to swing an election, just a bit of fraud in key districts can swing a state one way or another. You cant have fraud on a wide scale national level because every state runs it's own elections. You focus on fraud in 3 or 4 swing states. Ohio, Penn, FL,NC for instance.
Adjudicator
Loves Spam
- Joined
- Jan 26, 2016
- Posts
- 1,902
Do the country a favor if you really believe the conspiracy malarkey: get in your doomsday prepped underground bunker. Stay there.
snugglestruggle
...
- Joined
- Oct 1, 2011
- Posts
- 7,373
Know what else is Ironic? The timing, is it Coincidence or message?
Julian Assange's mentor dead, cause unknown
KimGordon67
Rampant feminist
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2014
- Posts
- 8,379
It would seem that the best way to influence electoral outcomes would be to disenfranchise a significant chunk of the population ... or better yet, significant chunks of specific populations.
Hmmm ... how would one go about doing that, I wonder?
Hmmm ... how would one go about doing that, I wonder?
4est_4est_Gump
Run Forrest! RUN!
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2011
- Posts
- 89,007
JFK, Cook County
Ishmael
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Nov 24, 2001
- Posts
- 84,005
No. Evidence of massive vote tampering or fraud would indicate someone is trying to rig the election. You don't rig a national election with a "little bit of fraud" when millions of votes are being cast in all 50 states. You don't even rig an election in the key major electoral states with a "little bit of fraud." You need lots and lots of fraud on an unprecedented scale to make certain you are going to pull the caper off. That's not to say some people aren't going to try it. Some clowns will do it just for the bragging rights of telling their buddies that they "voted twice." But those routine and isolated incidents don't reflect an organized attempt by a political party to "rig" an election.
But at this point, rigging an election against Donald Trump would be like breaking into a hospice care facility and cutting the oxygen and IV tubes of the most severely terminally ill patients. It's hardly worth the effort.
One vote at a time. The evidence is mounting that up to 3% of the vote is cast by those ineligible. These votes are, for the most part, declared 'mistaken' as opposed to fraud. Regardless, in key districts 3% is more than enough to make a difference.
It seems to me that asking a voter to produce some form of ID is NOT an unendurable burden. Asking no more than what is required to cash a check, drive a car, buy a six-pack of beer, board an airplane. To hear some speak you would think that being able to prove that you are who you are is a burden beyond endurance. One is truly forced to question their motives.
Ishmael
underguy1
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2005
- Posts
- 2,857
Similar threads
