About The Election...

[FGB]

If Trump gets totally unacceptable and Hillary gets arrested and it could happen... what is Y'all's opinion of the second stringers?

 

[jomar]

Biden is champing at the bit.

 

[FGB]

Biden is champing at the bit.

I think what's his name can take him!

 

[Que]

I think what's his name can take him!

I'm not a paid political consultant but I think that what's his name has a name recognition problem.

 

[sr71plt]

Not going to happen, and there's much more going on that could get Trump arrested than Hillary. Trump keeps having a rape inquiry (of a thirteen-year-old) pushed back, is on the hook for Trump University fraud, is having his foundation investigated for illegal use of charity funds and bribery of an official, is under investigation for foreign money coming into his campaign fund and for soliciting same, which is illegal, and, by rights, should be under investigation (and probably is) for espionage with the Russians. Even his claims about his taxes being audited smacks of possible legal problems there. What is it you think Hillary might be arrested for? In other words, how long have you been sniffing the glue? She's been exonerated legally on Benghazi thirty-two times over, anything on the e-mails has been formally dropped, the current e-mail dump has no legal ramifications, and she's not Bill Clinton (who also isn't running for president), so you don't have her on rape--certainly not like Trump may be fingered for it.

This "lock her up" business, which you obviously have been sucked into, is deflection from the genuine legal problems Trump is building up. Congrats on having been made Trump's chump.

Beyond that, neither one of them is going to be interfered with by authorities until after the election, which is less than a month away.

There's certainly a lot of fantasy and seeking out of cheap entertainment going on on this forum.

You poor guys have really been having a rough decade. First you got whooped by a black man, who is ending his two terms with the highest approval rating of anyone in government, and now you're facing eight years with a woman as boss. Enough to make a white redneck man shed tears. (Put crying baby emoticon here.)

 

[underguy1]

Not going to happen, and there's much more going on that could get Trump arrested than Hillary. Trump keeps having a rape inquiry pushed back, is on the hook for Trump University fraud, is having his foundation investigated for illegal use of charity funds and bribery of an official, is under investigation for foreign money coming into his campaign fund and for soliciting same, which is illegal, and, by rights, should be under investigation (and probably is) for espionage with the Russians. Even his claims about his taxes being audited smacks of possible legal problems there. What is it you think Hillary might be arrested for? In other words, how long have you been sniffing the glue? She's been exonerated legally on Benghazi thirty-two times over, anything on the e-mails has been formally dropped, the current e-mail dump has no legal ramifications, and she's not Bill Clinton (who also isn't running for president), so you don't have her on rape--certainly not like Trump may be fingered for it.

This "lock her up" business, which you obviously have been sucked into, is deflection from the genuine legal problems Trump is building up. Congrats on having been made Trump's chump.

Beyond that, neither one of them is going to be interfered with by authorities until after the election, which is less than a month away.

There's certainly a lot of fantasy and seeking out of cheap entertainment going on on this forum.

LOLz. You are shameless.

 

[BotanyBoy]

This "lock her up" business, which you obviously have been sucked into, is deflection from the genuine legal problems Trump is building up.

Says the guy ignoring the fact that Clinton's violation of security protocols that would have landed anyone else in the fuckin' slammer.

 

[Christobal]

If Trump gets totally unacceptable and Hillary gets arrested and it could happen... what is Y'all's opinion of the second stringers?

To just be strait forward.

Clinton or Trump is all we get. No matter what we hope and dream that is all we get.

 

[Hypoxia]

To just be strait forward.

Clinton or Trump is all we get. No matter what we hope and dream that is all we get.

And at this point it'll be Clinton unless we're blindsided in the next few weeks. Current betting odds (https://electionbettingodds.com/) are HRC ~84% vs Tramp ~15%. But in this campaign the unimaginable is the new inevitable. Some heavy shit COULD come down. Ain't over till it's over and it still ain't over even then. Yes, most likely it's Clinton and maybe Tromp. But even 1% possibilities happen.

 

[FGB]

Not going to happen, and there's much more going on that could get Trump arrested than Hillary. Trump keeps having a rape inquiry (of a thirteen-year-old) pushed back, is on the hook for Trump University fraud, is having his foundation investigated for illegal use of charity funds and bribery of an official, is under investigation for foreign money coming into his campaign fund and for soliciting same, which is illegal, and, by rights, should be under investigation (and probably is) for espionage with the Russians. Even his claims about his taxes being audited smacks of possible legal problems there. What is it you think Hillary might be arrested for? In other words, how long have you been sniffing the glue? She's been exonerated legally on Benghazi thirty-two times over, anything on the e-mails has been formally dropped, the current e-mail dump has no legal ramifications, and she's not Bill Clinton (who also isn't running for president), so you don't have her on rape--certainly not like Trump may be fingered for it.

This "lock her up" business, which you obviously have been sucked into, is deflection from the genuine legal problems Trump is building up. Congrats on having been made Trump's chump.

Beyond that, neither one of them is going to be interfered with by authorities until after the election, which is less than a month away.

There's certainly a lot of fantasy and seeking out of cheap entertainment going on on this forum.

You poor guys have really been having a rough decade. First you got whooped by a black man, who is ending his two terms with the highest approval rating of anyone in government, and now you're facing eight years with a woman as boss. Enough to make a white redneck man shed tears. (Put crying baby emoticon here.)

(Looks in the microwave at the popcorn bag jumping around and grabs glass of ice some 101 and some cola) well now...We will see won't we.

 

[Hypoxia]

(Looks in the microwave at the popcorn bag jumping around and grabs glass of ice some 101 and some cola) well now...We will see won't we.

The entertainment is merely ramping-up. Does anyone have an estimate on campaign spending this cycle? How much cash for media buys, network enrichment, consultant fees? If we pays good money we expect a good show. Has USA seen a more riveting spectacle in decades? After Tromp loses, will he appear on DANCING WITH THE STARS? Hey, why hasn't he been there yet?

 

[lovecraft68]

This isn't an election at this point.

What this is, is asking America to decide which way they want to see the country destroyed, because both candidates will achieve that goal in their own special and unique way.

 

[NOIRTRASH]

Hillary has perfect immunity from Obama.

Trump is backed by God. God aint Obama, and its his first important role in the history of the world. But you never know.

 

[Stewart_Pidd]

I'm not a paid political consultant but I think that what's his name has a name recognition problem.

I'm changing my name to George Washington bro.

Stew

 

[Stewart_Pidd]

(Looks in the microwave at the popcorn bag jumping around and grabs glass of ice some 101 and some cola) well now...We will see won't we.

I bet you get distracted by butterflies bro.

Stew

 

[sr71plt]

LOLz. You are shameless.

Yes, I can see that you're frustrated to distraction because Clinton is the one your bully boys decided to go after for screwing up handling of the e-mail age, just like the rest of the government, including her two (Republican) predecessors did--and that charges were formally dropped. Yep, folks, including President Hillary Clinton (*smile*) are going to have to be more careful all across government with the e-mail thing--as the Russians have shown in their electioneering for Trump.

I'm waiting to see what actual charges of anything you can identify that are pending on Hillary Clinton in light of the underage rape inquiry, upcoming Trump University trial, suspension of the Trump Foundation in New York on the charge of misappropriation of charity money and of bribing an official, the ongoing investigation of the Trump campaign for soliciting foreign contributions illegally and for colluding with the Russian government in election fixing, and auditing of questionable tax returns that are hanging over Trump's head.

As I posted the whole "lock her up" campaign is a deflection from Trump being the one with legal problems. And you are doing the same deflection two-step.

Pity that it isn't working. Altogether now, let's practice saying: Mrs. President.

 

[underguy1]

Yes, I can see that you're frustrated to distraction because Clinton is the one your bully boys decided to go after for screwing up handling of the e-mail age, just like the rest of the government, including her two (Republican) predecessors did--and that charges were formally dropped. Yep, folks, including President Hillary Clinton (*smile*) are going to have to be more careful all across government with the e-mail thing--as the Russians have shown in their electioneering for Trump.

I'm waiting to see what actual charges of anything you can identify that are pending on Hillary Clinton in light of the underage rape inquiry, upcoming Trump University trial, suspension of the Trump Foundation in New York on the charge of misappropriation of charity money and of bribing an official, the ongoing investigation of the Trump campaign for soliciting foreign contributions illegally and for colluding with the Russian government in election fixing, and auditing of questionable tax returns that are hanging over Trump's head.

As I posted the whole "lock her up" campaign is a deflection from Trump being the one with legal problems. And you are doing the same deflection two-step.

Pity that it isn't working. Altogether now, let's practice saying: Mrs. President.

You really are an ignoramus. I'm not with Trump in any way shape or form. I oppose him for many of the same reasons that I oppose Clinton. They are both candidates that will represent the 1% over the rest.

But unlike you I don't and won't swallow the Clinton propaganda.

And what makes you shameless and repellant is that you spread it. You have absolutely no evidence to support your allegations but you spread them anyway.

That makes you a shill.

And a racist.

 

[underguy1]

Top House Dems Insist FBI Probe Trump Ties to ‘Russia Hacks’
Lawmakers Term Alleged Trump Involvement 'Ongoing Criminal Activity'
by Jason Ditz, October 14, 2016

Since the Democratic National Convention, the Clinton campaign has been accusing the Russian government of being behind a series of hacks embarrassing to Hillary Clinton, and has repeatedly claimed that Republican nominee Donald Trump is in league with the Russians.

House Dems appears to be looking to back up those allegations today, demanding that the FBI both launch a formal investigation into Trump’s involvement in the hacks, and for the FBI to “explain to the American people what steps it is taking to disrupt this ongoing criminal activity.”

The demands are coming from top committee members from four different House committees, and they are claiming that Trump adviser Roger Stone’s admission that he met with a “mutual friend” of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange amounted to him “bragging” about being involved in the hacks.

The Obama Administration already “confirmed” a link between the hacks and Russia, though they’ve offered no real evidence of that claim. Trump’s links to all this are even more speculative, though Clinton’s campaign has treated them as an undisputed fact for months.

http://news.antiwar.com/2016/10/14/top-house-dems-insist-fbi-probe-trump-ties-to-russia-hacks/

If you repeat the lie often enough, the masses will begin to believe it.

 

[sr71plt]

You really are an ignoramus. I'm not with Trump in any way shape or form. I oppose him for many of the same reasons that I oppose Clinton. They are both candidates that will represent the 1% over the rest.

But unlike you I don't and won't swallow the Clinton propaganda.

And what makes you shameless and repellant is that you spread it. You have absolutely no evidence to support your allegations but you spread them anyway.

That makes you a shill.

And a racist.

So, what are you saying? There there are actual charges for anything illegal that are currently ongoing against Hillary Clinton? (Because I challenged you to identify any and you haven't done so. So, in the realm of deflection and not giving any evidence . . .)

Or are you saying that Trump doesn't have a 16 December date (now) for an inquiry over an underage rape charge. Or that he doesn't have a court date for a Trump University fraud case? Or that New York hasn't suspended the Trump Foundation and is investigating misuse of charity funds and a bribery of an official charge? Or that the United States government hasn't formally charged Russia with hacking e-mail accounts in the favor of Trump's campaign? Or that Trump's taxes aren't under audit?

Because, I mean, you can google that for yourself--if you can take time off from your deflection efforts, which include you claiming I haven't evidenced anything while you aren't evidencing anything.

And, gee, it's easy to get the impression that you are shilling for Trump when you are into the exact same deflection song and dance that his other shills are doing.

 

[underguy1]

So, what are you saying? There there are actual charges for anything illegal that are currently ongoing against Hillary Clinton? (Because I challenged you to identify any and you haven't done so. So, in the realm of deflection and not giving any evidence . . .)

Or are you saying that Trump doesn't have a 16 December date (now) for an inquiry over an underage rape charge. Or that he doesn't have a court date for a Trump University fraud case? Or that New York hasn't suspended the Trump Foundation and is investigating misuse of charity funds and a bribery of an official charge? Or that the United States government hasn't formally charged Russia with hacking e-mail accounts in the favor of Trump's campaign? Or that Trump's taxes aren't under audit?

Because, I mean, you can google that for yourself--if you can take time off from your deflection efforts, which include you claiming I haven't evidenced anything while you aren't evidencing anything.

And, gee, it's easy to get the impression that you are shilling for Trump when you are into the exact same deflection song and dance that his other shills are doing.

Oh stop your childish rhetorical games. You don't get to frame the argument in your narrow terms.

The Clintons are elite criminals and anyone with an iota of common sense can see that in living technicolour.

Whether you are paid for this crap or not, you are a shameless shill for the war criminal and mass murderer.

 

[underguy1]

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CuxxVi8UAAApjn_.jpg

 

[sr71plt]

Oh stop your childish rhetorical games. You don't get to frame the argument in your narrow terms.

The Clintons are elite criminals and anyone with an iota of common sense can see that in living technicolour.

Whether you are paid for this crap or not, you are a shameless shill for the war criminal and mass murderer.

Yep, you're still doing the Trump deflection shuffle and not answering the question.

What a surprise.

 

[underguy1]

Yep, you're still doing the Trump deflection shuffle and not answering the question.

What a surprise.

I'm not interested in your childish game. You may well live in a bubble where that sort of nonsense plays.

I don't.

You need to play with some fellow right wingers like Eyer and Botany Boy if you want that stuff.

As for deflection, your whole Russophobic routine is racist and absurd on its face.

The documents are real and damning. The source is irrelevant.

 

[sr71plt]

I'm not interested in your childish game. You may well live in a bubble where that sort of nonsense plays.

I don't.

You need to play with some fellow right wingers like Eyer and Botany Boy if you want that stuff.

As for deflection, your whole Russophobic routine is racist and absurd on its face.

The documents are real and damning. The source is irrelevant.

What documents formally charging Hillary Clinton with anything? And, yes, the multiple charges Trump faces are documented.

You're not going to answer the challenges, are you? Didn't think so. Just another Trump chump deflector.

 

[underguy1]

What documents formally charging Hillary Clinton with anything? And, yes, the multiple charges Trump faces are documented.

You're not going to answer the challenges, are you? Didn't think so. Just another Trump chump deflector.

Oh you keep changing the goal posts even after I refuse to play your silly right wing game?

You're not a challenge. You're a dishonest right wing shill for the War Party.