Remember That Lawsuit Accusing Donald Trump Of Child Rape?

[DumpTrump]

http://www.redstate.com/streiff/201...ber-lawsuit-accusing-donald-trump-child-rape/

The complaint alleges billionaire convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein had a woman pickup teenage girls for his famous parties. One of these girls was “Jane.” Another witness, “Tiffany,” who also provided an affidavit in the lawsuit, said she witnessed Trump and Epstein rape the plaintiff several times. Trump has repeatedly denied the allegations.

 

[NtlSecAgcy]

Good thing you're posting that from the same progressive side of the partisan aisle the GB moderator tyrannically rules from.

 

[islandman]

Good thing you're posting that from the same progressive side of the partisan aisle the GB moderator tyrannically rules from.

Because the other side of the aisle is okay with child rape?

 

[NtlSecAgcy]

Forum Guidelines

2. You may not post sexually explicit pictures or stories featuring anyone under 18 years old. Literotica does not allow the posting of underage or animal sex pictures - or links to such, or text/story posts/links to advocation thereof - on the forum. This includes discussions and/or accusations involving pedophilia and/or child sex abuse. Please Click Here for our full photo posting guidelines.

http://www.literotica.com/support/forum_rules.shtml

 

[Hard_Rom]

Edit to ..... and abandon this thread. You're flirtin' with disaster.

 

[islandman]

http://www.literotica.com/support/forum_rules.shtml

A lawsuit filed with a court and assigned an index number is a rather liberal interpretation of a "story".

 

[NtlSecAgcy]

You mean "liberal" as in the progressive GB moderator instantly banning a poster for doing nothing different, yet citing that exact Forum Guideline as her justification?

Why is it okay to reference such a despicable court case involving the Republican candidate, but when the Democrat candidate's despicable actions in an equally repulsive court case are aired likewise, a poster is banned by the progressive GB moderator for "discussions and/or accusations involving pedophilia and/or child sex abuse" when there was likewise no such "story"?

 

[Hypoxia]

Why is it okay to reference such a despicable court case involving the Republican candidate, but when the Democrat candidate's despicable actions in an equally repulsive court case are aired likewise, a poster is banned by the progressive GB moderator for "discussions and/or accusations involving pedophilia and/or child sex abuse" when there was likewise no such "story"?

Who was HRC accused of molesting?

 

[Hard_Rom]

Isn't NtlSecAgcy an eyer alt going on about the usual forum rules?

 

[islandman]

You mean "liberal" as in the progressive GB moderator instantly banning a poster for doing nothing different, yet citing that exact Forum Guideline as her justification?

Why is it okay to reference such a despicable court case involving the Republican candidate, but when the Democrat candidate's despicable actions in an equally repulsive court case are aired likewise, a poster is banned by the progressive GB moderator for "discussions and/or accusations involving pedophilia and/or child sex abuse" when there was likewise no such "story"?

Has HRC been accused of pedophilia?

 

[phrodeau]

Has HRC been accused of pedophilia?

I think underguy did once.

 

[NtlSecAgcy]

What in the world does that have to do with our point?

About as much as her husband himself officially logging over 20 flights on Epstein's infamous "Lolita Express" before his good buddy Epstein was busted, which = absolutely nothing to do with our point.

BTW, though: isn't it funny that Trump and WJC and Epstein were such great pals in those good old days? Do you think Hillary was ignorant about what Donny and Billy and Jerry were up to all those times back and forth in flight to and from and at "Sex Slave Island"?

We would eat foot long shards of razor sharp glass before we'd vote for Hillary, but we still don't fantasize for a nanosecond that she's stupid in any way, shape, or form, which simply underlines the long leveled charge that Bill went his ways in their marriage and she went hers. However, we cannot imagine electing another president who would overlook such things as that heinous stuff being trusted to look after the nation's business - enough is enough. Just imagine the times Donny and Billy shared, with Hillary purposely turning her head, and now these bozos are running against each other for President?

WTF, OVER?!

How can any American with just a lick of honest decency even think of voting for either?

But, we digress.

Our actual point is why does the progressive GB moderator instantly ban a poster, citing "discussions and/or accusations involving pedophilia and/or child sex abuse" when no such "story" - to any degree - was involved?

The answer, obviously, is that, once again, and despite her clear doublespeak about "impartiality", "fairness", and "Free Speech", she will not only instantly ban a poster totally subjectively, but she'll also then repulsively slander that poster by lying out of her fucking teeth on why she banned him.

Good thing Hillary relies on and appreciates such despicable supporters.

 

[underguy1]

I think underguy did once.

Stop being a troll, you retarded freak.

 

[IrezumiKiss]

Isn't NtlSecAgcy an eyer alt going on about the usual forum rules?

https://media.giphy.com/media/u9pVdgN26tpK0/giphy.gif

Flameouts and also-rans never change their spots, yo.

 

[phrodeau]

What in the world does that have to do with our point?

About as much as her husband himself officially logging over 20 flights on Epstein's infamous "Lolita Express" before his good buddy Epstein was busted, which = absolutely nothing to do with our point.

BTW, though: isn't it funny that Trump and WJC and Epstein were such great pals in those good old days? Do you think Hillary was ignorant about what Donny and Billy and Jerry were up to all those times back and forth in flight to and from and at "Sex Slave Island"?

We would eat foot long shards of razor sharp glass before we'd vote for Hillary, but we still don't fantasize for a nanosecond that she's stupid in any way, shape, or form, which simply underlines the long leveled charge that Bill went his ways in their marriage and she went hers. However, we cannot imagine electing another president who would overlook such things as that heinous stuff being trusted to look after the nation's business - enough is enough. Just imagine the times Donny and Billy shared, with Hillary purposely turning her head, and now these bozos are running against each other for President?

WTF, OVER?!

How can any American with just a lick of honest decency even think of voting for either?

But, we digress.

Our actual point is why does the progressive GB moderator instantly ban a poster, citing "discussions and/or accusations involving pedophilia and/or child sex abuse" when no such "story" - to any degree - was involved?

The answer, obviously, is that, once again, and despite her clear doublespeak about "impartiality", "fairness", and "Free Speech", she will not only instantly ban a poster totally subjectively, but she'll also then repulsively slander that poster by lying out of her fucking teeth on why she banned him.

Good thing Hillary relies on and appreciates such despicable supporters.

Trying to sell a book, are you?

You want us to believe that a man actually tried to pimp underage girls to the President, who is charged by oath to uphold the nation's laws? Nobody with an ounce of sense would do that.

As soon as Bill Clinton learned about Epstein's habits, he severed their relationship, as would I.

 

[underguy1]

Trying to sell a book, are you?

You want us to believe that a man actually tried to pimp underage girls to the President, who is charged by oath to uphold the nation's laws? Nobody with an ounce of sense would do that.

As soon as Bill Clinton learned about Epstein's habits, he severed their relationship, as would I.

You are such a naive/lying partisan.