Here's How Donald Trump Could Become President

[SgtSpiderMan]

"We're going to rebuild our inner cities because our African-American communities are absolutely in the worst shape that they've ever been in before. Ever. Ever. Ever,"

Trump.

 

[sr71plt]

"We're going to rebuild our inner cities because our African-American communities are absolutely in the worst shape that they've ever been in before. Ever. Ever. Ever,"

Trump.

Worst shape than they were in in 1850? I don't think so.

 

[Adre]

"We're going to rebuild our inner cities because our African-American communities are absolutely in the worst shape that they've ever been in before. Ever. Ever. Ever,"

Trump.

He has a history of building affordable housing and caring about the poverty stricken.

 

[BotanyBoy]

"We're going to rebuild our inner cities because our African-American communities are absolutely in the worst shape that they've ever been in before. Ever. Ever. Ever,"

Trump.

Aren't they?

Haven't you been paying attention to how oppressed women and minorities are?

USA is the WORST thing to ever happen to minorities and women. The evil white male prevents them all from bettering themselves with his extensive, systematic, institutionalized and well documented racism.

DJT is just recognizing that and agreeing with liberal (D)'s.

Worst shape than they were in in 1850? I don't think so.

YOU RACIST PRIVILEGED FUCKIN' WHITE MALE!!!

THE USA 2016 is the WORST thing that has ever happened to minorities EVER.

Now agree or you're a regressive Republican RACIST!!!

 

[BoyNextDoor]

The circumstances under which Donald Trump becomes President are extremely clear at this point because the math is pretty much determined:


-> Trump wins FL and PA: Trump is President

 

[Disgustipated]

I took you off ignore two days ago because you were actively posting in a thread I was reading. I recently started posting more often and barely posted months ago.

So what? Did you want a party? Should I have dedicated a thread to you and made a speech? Your low IQ shines through as always. Next time there will be a parade, I promise.

You should quote me in your sig again. That'll show me!

Fuck, you make vettenutter look almost coherent and somewhat sane.

 

[LadyFunkenstein]

Of course you didn't pay attention. You are one of Trump's deplorable patsies.

Or are you so stupid that you're going to claim that Trump hasn't gone through this whole campaign calling everyone in his way some derogatory name or other. Are you going to be that dumb? Are you going to be so dumb that you can't understand the answer to your own question--why someone would use a pet name for Trump too?

I think Trump is a ridiculous candidate and that his followers are mostly idiots.

Why are you evading my simple question?

 

[LadyFunkenstein]

You should quote me in your sig again. That'll show me!

Fuck, you make vettenutter look almost coherent and somewhat sane.

I think I've had the sig for 3 years. I keep them turned off so I haven't given it any thought. In fact I'm pretty sure no one cares nor have even noted what it says, other than you. I didn't know you were paying attention for all of these years.

Why do you think that invoking the handle of a bygone unpopular poster elevates you in this discussion with me? That and why do you think it should wound me?

 

[sr71plt]

I think Trump is a ridiculous candidate and that his followers are mostly idiots.

Why are you evading my simple question?

God, you're dense. How many ways can I answer your stupid question? People call Trump Drumpf because he called so many other people derogatory names before they did that. They do it to turn his own behavior back on him. How could you be so dense as not to have figured that out yourself--and then not to get it after you were repeatedly told why?

 

[Disgustipated]

I think I've had the sig for 3 years. I keep them turned off so I haven't given it any thought. In fact I'm pretty sure no one cares nor have even noted what it says, other than you. I didn't know you were paying attention for all of these years.

Why do you think that invoking the handle of a bygone unpopular poster elevates you in this discussion with me? That and why do you think it should wound me?

It was less than 2 years ago and you invoked my handle in this thread about "Drumpf".

Shut the fuck up already.

 

[LadyFunkenstein]

God, you're dense. How many ways can I answer your stupid question? People call Trump Drumpf because he called so many other people derogatory names before they did that. They do it to turn his own behavior back on him. How could you be so dense as not to have figured that out yourself--and then not to get it after you were repeatedly told why?

Why are you posting like a lunatic?

 

[LadyFunkenstein]

It was less than 2 years ago and you invoked my handle in this thread about "Drumpf".

OK, I made my signature less than 2 years. I don't remember and assume you are right. Sorry I still haven't thought of it since then, thanks for keeping track you win. Everything else I said remains the same though. Just change "3 years" to "less than two".

Shut the fuck up already.

Why? Just don't read my posts. Ya know, what I have done about you off and on for many years. Do it to me, there is no need to insist that I become silent for your personal comfort. Stop reading, your problems are solved. You are a like a crazy SJW college student, demanding I stop having a voice.

 

[sr71plt]

Why are you posting like a lunatic?

I'm trying to reach you on your level.

Still being dense?

 

[Disgustipated]

missed a key word. oh well.

OK, I made my signature less than 2 years. I don't remember and assume you are right. Sorry I still haven't thought of it since then, thanks for keeping track you win. Everything else I said remains the same though. Just change "3 years" to "less than two".



Why? Just don't read my posts. Ya know, what I have done about you off and on for many years. Do it to me, there is no need to insist that I become silent for your personal comfort. Stop reading, your problems are solved. You are a like a crazy SJW college student, demanding I stop having a voice.

I'm not demanding you stop having a voice. I'm pointing out your voice is a fucking raving psycho who seems to have lost touch with reality.

 

[LadyFunkenstein]

I'm demanding you stop having a voice. I'm pointing out your voice is a fucking raving psycho who seems to have lost touch with reality.

Well, you continue reading the voice of a fucking raving psycho who seemingly has lost touch with reality. This is an excellent use of your free time.

 

[Beco]

The circumstances under which Donald Trump becomes President are extremely clear at this point because the math is pretty much determined:


-> Trump wins FL and PA: Trump is President

I won't believe it, until it happens.....It seems impossible

 

[BotanyBoy]

I won't believe it, until it happens.....It seems impossible

Yea...it would certainly prove that the establishment doesn't have anywhere near the power I think they do.

But I'm pretty sure HRC is so fuckin' chill and smug because she knows...she has already won and it doesn't matter who she runs against.

 

[renard_ruse]

"We're going to rebuild our inner cities because our African-American communities are absolutely in the worst shape that they've ever been in before. Ever. Ever. Ever,"

Trump.

That's what the Democrats and the media keep telling us. Trump will actually do something to fix the problem.

 

[renard_ruse]

I thought the Donald had this wrapped up last week, but I guess the latest round of media slander and attacks have pushed his poll numbers back down.

Would be very sad if he doesn't win this thing, but the reality is it doesn't matter that much anyway. With Trump as President things might get 10% better than they are now, if the establishment wins it might get another 10% worse. The reality is that the "west" and the US is long ago lost into an eternal shithole of liberalism. The secret is to live your life the way you want, as best you can. Even in the Soviet Union people found ways around the system.

Countries are a joke concept in the first place. The national (ethnic homeland) based state was the least bad version of the concept but even that was flawed. You need to just be an individual, live your life, and try to find ways to keep tyrants like RoryN or Obama or George Soros or the rest of the scum bags from having too much control over your life. They aren't omnipresent, so fuck em.

 

[Wrong Element]

The circumstances under which Donald Trump becomes President are extremely clear at this point because the math is pretty much determined:


-> Trump wins FL and PA: Trump is President

Probably. I'm not sure why there has been so little polling of Pennsylvania, which is the key to the Dems' firewall. But the little polling I've seen has not shown Trump gains.


Florida looks very close, but given its history of vote suppression and the identity of its current governor and attorney general, the smart money should be on Trump unless he goes into free fall after doing something stupid (a better-than-slim chance of that happening).

 

[sr71plt]

Yes, let's keep on saying the voting is close. That will bring out more Democratic voters.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Trump has done a whole lot more wrong and misuse of charity than the Clintons have. The Clintons haven't misused charity at all that I've seen so far. They used their positions to pull in the charity money that has done a whole lot of good. Using their positions to do this, by the way, is business as usual in just about every government/society on earth. Sure, it would be nice to cut that down and for the wealthy to open their pocketbooks just out of a sense of public duty and gratefulness that they have the means to help, but it's hardly a Clinton-only activity. In addition, no one has shown that Clinton receiving big charity donors when she was secretary of state (all folks she would have given appointments to anyway as a cabinet secretary) resulted in giving them anything more than a warm and fuzzy handshake and smile and a photo op. If you can show that she did, cite it from a reputable source. Otherwise stop your Swiftboating.

Trump, on the other hand, has been accused--yet to be proved, but let's go ahead investigate that, shall we? (and strongly suspect we both know what would be found--especially when he insists on hiding his records)--of having turned charity money around to support his personal and business interests--and the legal authorities are now picking that up to investigate.

All the probabilities point to you being a Swiftboater on the Clinton Foundation and a willing dupe on the Trump Foundation. Welcome to the ranks of the dumb chumps Trump is conning.

Do some reading on their efforts in Haiti and the funneling of donations to her brother and then get back to me. I stopped reading as soon as I discovered your willful ignorance of the workings of the Clinton Foundation.

Dupe is a strong word. I have stated many times and do so again; if you are unwilling to hold her accountable for acts in public office, I don't give a shit about what he did in the private sector. I'm not voting for either one of them. As far as I am concerned she is a corrupt politician (I know, a possible oxymoron). He might be corrupt, but he's not a politician. He's Rodney Dangerfield explaining how the real world works to the smug and arrogant professor of theories...

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Why is "Drumpf" thought to be an effective put down? It's pretty stupid, and there is no way that he nor his fans care. So he has a silly sounding last name in his family history, so do most of us. Why is this supposed to be insulting, funny or clever?

Maybe because of all the dumb names he's called everyone else? Duh.

You make her point for her. When he called JEB! low energy, it stuck.

When he dismissed "little" Marco, it was effective.

When he finally engaged "lyin'" Ted,

It worked.



"Corrupt" Hillary hit the nail..., too easy, it tore into the Achilles' Heel of her status as inevitable, invincible and invulnerable, no mortal politician she...

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Yes, let's keep on saying the voting is close. That will bring out more Democratic voters.

And none of them will be of the angry white Democrat demographic in the rust-belt states?

You assume that Hillary has a lock on every single Democrat vote?

Not all of them are as partisan as yourself sir.

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

You make her point for her. When he called JEB! low energy, it stuck.

When he dismissed "little" Marco, it was effective.

When he finally engaged "lyin'" Ted,

It worked.



"Corrupt" Hillary hit the nail..., too easy, it tore into the Achilles' Heel of her status as inevitable, invincible and invulnerable, no mortal politician she...

Calling him Drumpf is an effective put down because it exposes all of his hypocrisies.

He calls HRC corrupt, but he's been caught doing the same or worse.
He runs on a law and order platform but he breaks the law and refuses to be accountable when he does.