Hey Lovecraft68 I call you out dude

[Sean Renaud]

Blah blah blah. You can bring up all the bullshit you like, and I could do the same for things you've accused me of. But when things are true I remain honest. Sorry about that.

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

Your entire argument is that they will make them obsolete.

My specific argument has been that sex robots won't make women obsolete. Women will be liberated by them.

I look forward to sex robots and other things that will enable men to find female companionship without having to negotiate with a woman. And artificial wombs are said to be available 30 years from now. And in case you haven't read, this won't mean the end of women - it'll mean less men chasing women and more men interacting with women without a sexual connotation because they'll have that covered elsewhere.

This refutes your accusation.

And when sex robots and artificial come along, well, there won't be any need for these women at all. They'll be quickly replaced by adaptive (non robot) women who realize hypergamy isn't the way to keep the species going. By then, though, there won't be any need for women to keep the species going - and women won't go extinct, they will adapt just fine. It'll just be curtains closed for hypergamic women.

This refutes your accusation.

You lose.

That is specifically why you want them. It's like claiming that cars don't make horses obsolete and then begging for evidence.

We made cars and horses still exist. Your argument fails yet again.

You're on record for saying that the only use a woman has is sex and reproduction. Gotcha. I on the other hand repeatedly say that women should be freed from this to pursue her own sense of purpose.

 

[Sean Renaud]

I graciously accept your surrender.

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

Your entire argument is that they will make them obsolete.

My specific argument has been that sex robots won't make women obsolete. Women will be liberated by them.

I look forward to sex robots and other things that will enable men to find female companionship without having to negotiate with a woman. And artificial wombs are said to be available 30 years from now. And in case you haven't read, this won't mean the end of women - it'll mean less men chasing women and more men interacting with women without a sexual connotation because they'll have that covered elsewhere.

This refutes your accusation.

And when sex robots and artificial come along, well, there won't be any need for these women at all. They'll be quickly replaced by adaptive (non robot) women who realize hypergamy isn't the way to keep the species going. By then, though, there won't be any need for women to keep the species going - and women won't go extinct, they will adapt just fine. It'll just be curtains closed for hypergamic women.

This refutes your accusation.

You lose.

That is specifically why you want them. It's like claiming that cars don't make horses obsolete and then begging for evidence.

We made cars and horses still exist. Your argument fails yet again.

You're on record for saying that the only use a woman has is sex and reproduction. Gotcha. I on the other hand repeatedly say that women should be freed from this to pursue her own sense of purpose.

 

[Sean Renaud]

What do horses still existing have to do with anything?

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

What do horses still existing have to do with anything?

LOL

I take it you forgot that you posted this?

It's like claiming that cars don't make horses obsolete and then begging for evidence.

It goes without saying that you feel women are only useful for sex and reproduction and you are projecting that on me, because my narrative directly and specifically contradicts this.

 

[Sean Renaud]

No I didn't forget I said that. Can you explain how it is relevant to your point? And you are the one who has claimed women are only useful for sex, hense your desire for sex robots. Lets try to stay on point.

What does the existance of a horse have to do with anything?

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

No I didn't forget I said that. Can you explain how it is relevant to your point?

It isn't, which is why you bringing up horses in the first place was utterly pointless.

And you are the one who has claimed women are only useful for sex, hense your desire for sex robots. Lets try to stay on point.

Since no post of mine ever said that, you lose and I win yet again.

 

[Sean Renaud]

It isn't, which is why you bringing up horses in the first place was utterly pointless.


Since no post of mine ever said that, you lose and I win yet again.

It is important, people drive cars now. The existance of a horse doesn't negate that does it?

Do you ride a horse. . .sorry did you ride a horse to work?

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

It is important, people drive cars now. The existance of a horse doesn't negate that does it?

Do you ride a horse. . .sorry did you ride a horse to work?

IOW you see women as brood mares and nothing more.

 

[Sean Renaud]

You've got us confused there. I'm not the one pining for the day robots replace women in the world. I'm the one saying that's stupid. But it's cute that you can't tell us apart.

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

You've got us confused there. I'm not the one pining for the day robots replace women in the world. I'm the one saying that's stupid. But it's cute that you can't tell us apart.

Robots won't ever replace women because as I've said, women aren't just for sex and reproduction. You're the only person here who has ever talked about robots replacing women, because you're the only person here who sees women having such limited reasons for existing.

 

[Sean Renaud]

Nope. Sorry, you're just delusional. Everybody who reads your posts gets the same exactly image I do. Because it's what you're saying. You can backpedal all you fucking want but the idea that sex robots will diminish women is a claim you have put forth.

But just so we have it one more time in your own words why should we look forward to the day sex robots happen?

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

Your entire argument is that they will make them obsolete.

My specific argument has been that sex robots won't make women obsolete. Women will be liberated by them.

I look forward to sex robots and other things that will enable men to find female companionship without having to negotiate with a woman. And artificial wombs are said to be available 30 years from now. And in case you haven't read, this won't mean the end of women - it'll mean less men chasing women and more men interacting with women without a sexual connotation because they'll have that covered elsewhere.

This refutes your accusation.

And when sex robots and artificial come along, well, there won't be any need for these women at all. They'll be quickly replaced by adaptive (non robot) women who realize hypergamy isn't the way to keep the species going. By then, though, there won't be any need for women to keep the species going - and women won't go extinct, they will adapt just fine. It'll just be curtains closed for hypergamic women.

This refutes your accusation.

You lose.

That is specifically why you want them. It's like claiming that cars don't make horses obsolete and then begging for evidence.

We made cars and horses still exist. Your argument fails yet again.

You're on record for saying that the only use a woman has is sex and reproduction. Gotcha. I on the other hand repeatedly say that women should be freed from this to pursue her own sense of purpose.

 

[sr71plt]

Isn't it about time you renamed this the "Hey Sean I call you out dude" thread? It seems to be down to the two of you.

 

[Sean Renaud]

I don't think we can change the names of threads. Mods can but the GB officially has no mod.

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

I don't think we can change the names of threads. Mods can but the GB officially has no mod.

It's now the "LJ and his organ grinder monkey show" thread.

 

[Sean Renaud]

I think you mean the LJ doesn't know when he's beat thread.

 

[Ulaven_Demorte]

I think you mean the LJ doesn't know when he's beat thread.

That describes every single thread LeJackass participates in. You're going to need to number them sequentially to keep track.

 

[Sean Renaud]

That would be a fantastic amount of labor.

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

I think you mean the LJ doesn't know when he's beat thread.

If you had a dollar for every fight I lost here you would go so far into debt it would take four heat deaths of the universe for George Soros to pay it off.

 

[Sean Renaud]

It's cute that you believe that.

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

It's cute that you believe that.

All I have to do is challenge you to substantiate your many false accusations against me and you proceed to kick your own ass. Every argument we've had has ended with your fist smashing your own nose.

 

[Sean Renaud]

No, we have not. What we've got here is you utterly avoiding the topic that you broached because you cannot actually effectively debate your points. I don't understand why you think that insulting me over and over again will make me go away. It makes me realize how wrong I was to think you were a great man worthy of emulation but everybody makes mistakes. Aside from that it does little.

 

[Sean Renaud]

Oh I just can't wait to be wrong!

Man, if you were 50% quieter 100% of the population would think you were 20% smarter.