Why did Hitler hate jews?

No it isn't. Fascism is an ideology that supports the ruling class.

It's about as opposite of socialism as it gets.

Grow a brain, dickhead.

I own the book, retard. Hitler musta been Kiwi when he named his party the National German Socialist Workers Party. Kiwi fucks up minds bad.
 
I have little to no respect for Krugman. I think he's probably much closer to you in ideological terms than me.

I don't know what 'spending capital' could possibly mean.

Can you be more specific?

No, I can't explain it to you, because to you, money is something that is an infinite Supply that you create out of thin air as required.

Which government agency do you work for justifying continual unending spending?
 
Why is one of Trump's foreign advisor picks, Joseph Schmitz, a Holocaust denier? His rationale that the ovens were too small to kill six million Jews doesn't make sense. Maybe his not making sense is what attracted Trump to him?

Check out the Breitbart anti black, anti Jew and anti Native American views. Trump is doubling down on his whiny uneducated white guy base.
 
i have heard that he was a hald jewish himself

One grandfather is unknown. The suspect is grandma's boss, a Jew. But the suspicion is total guess. I suspect genetic testing went no where as Hitler had male kin from the same grandmother available for testing. Maybe incest.
 
Okay. Hitler has 39 male relatives alive today. They were genetically tested. All have one gene shared by 20%-30% of some Jews. Not all. The boss was eliminated as a contestant. The new guess is a Jewish boy the grandmother knew, but no connection was proved.
 
Check out the Breitbart anti black, anti Jew and anti Native American views. Trump is doubling down on his whiny uneducated white guy base.

Why do you quote yourself, then post a comment unrelated to your quoted post?

You could just click new post, and look slightly less schizo.

Also, why do you come to the GB where you know nobody, and nobody knows you, when you could spew your monologues at strangers on tbe political board to just as litle acclaim.
 
Last edited:
Why do you quote yourself, then post a comment unrelated to your quoted post?

You could just click new post, and look slightly less schizo.

Also, why do you come to the GB where you know nobody, and nobody knows you, when you could spew your monologues at strangers on tbe political board to just as litle acclaim.

Why do you post on any board where you know nothing?
 
Maybe Hitler once met Miles and it put him off the entire Red Sea Pedestrian brigade?
 
That is Sergeant Hans Schultz not Mr. Koch. You see a billionaire under every bed do you?

It looks like Joseph Schmitz, Trump's Holocaust denier foreign policy advisor. Remember? The guy who said Hitler couldn't have killed six million Jews because the ovens were too small?

Put a picture of Colonel Klink up. See how many people think it's Rudy Mussalami.
 
No, I can't explain it to you, because to you, money is something that is an infinite Supply that you create out of thin air as required.

Which government agency do you work for justifying continual unending spending?

I had a thread some time ago detailing the schools of "economics" (which is not an adjunct of the math department, but of the Social Studies Chair).

http://forum.literotica.com/showthread.php?t=1224359

https://mises.org/library/why-economics-matters-0

https://mises.org/sites/default/files/styles/full_width/public/economists-family-tree_0.jpg?itok=fIK72qCp

What we are experiencing with ug(g) is the polity from the academic Left that economics are top-down with a healthy belief in the Historical methodology of the Socialists of the Chair that believes that top-down "positive interferences of government (von Humboldt)" and control of the money supply are what create an economy. As a (Rothbardian) devote of Mises, I (and probably you) see an economy as a series of trades at the level of the individual which trickle up to create an economy, defining money and its value on the way up. Whenever the top-down money as policy method is tried with even better understanding, refined math and corrected models, it still fails because it is a static measurement of a economic dynamic, Human Action.

He might be an "economist," but that does not imply that he is a "correct" economist...
 
Boycott the Kochs.

In the list of rich people who donate to parties, the Kochs are down at about 59 with a whole bunch of Democrats above them.

This is just Alinskyism, identify, target, isolate and ridicule.

It's the Chicago, Clinton, Obama way.

George Soros. Where is he?

on the list...
 
Oops. Sorry, 4est. I misread your post. Nevermind.
 
Last edited:
I had a thread some time ago detailing the schools of "economics" (which is not an adjunct of the math department, but of the Social Studies Chair).

http://forum.literotica.com/showthread.php?t=1224359

https://mises.org/library/why-economics-matters-0

https://mises.org/sites/default/files/styles/full_width/public/economists-family-tree_0.jpg?itok=fIK72qCp

What we are experiencing with ug(g) is the polity from the academic Left that economics are top-down with a healthy belief in the Historical methodology of the Socialists of the Chair that believes that top-down "positive interferences of government (von Humboldt)" and control of the money supply are what create an economy. As a (Rothbardian) devote of Mises, I (and probably you) see an economy as a series of trades at the level of the individual which trickle up to create an economy, defining money and its value on the way up. Whenever the top-down money as policy method is tried with even better understanding, refined math and corrected models, it still fails because it is a static measurement of a economic dynamic, Human Action.

He might be an "economist," but that does not imply that he is a "correct" economist...

Well that's what I mean. All economist's struggle with forecasting because there are so many independent variables. Most economist spend a lot of time looking backwards to explain or Justify the results that we've seen from actions taken. Usually something the corporation in question or the government has done and wants to be able to justify that it wasn't their fault that the results that they got from the actions they took cause the results that they got.

not that he's ever going to articulate any of his beliefs since he is Sergeant Spidey on steroids but I would Hazard a guess that he's not an Austrian. Since he doesn't take into account the many incentives that influence actual humans in the marketplace and how that in turn affects the economy nothing that he does is going to be useful in any kind of predictive way.

Dictated but not proofread I'll let Luke check do that
 
The only proof that he has that he is an economist is his posts which sound exactly like most of the intelligentsia that currently controls the universities and pretends to teach our children while at the same time indoctrinating them with a hateful intolerance that would make Hitler (Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot, #BlackLiversMatter) proud.

If he wants to claim to be a university professor of economics, that I would be inclined to believe especially with his love of Arab violence against Jews.
 
I wonder where they would place Wicksteed (mentored by Jevons) whose methodology was pure Austrian (as per marginal utility) but whose social leanings were Big Government SJW Fabianism...


Hmmm...
 
*chuckle*

"Stalin and Hitler killed a lot of people (you could look it up) and a single-minded pursuit of filthy lucre is not the top item in the moral indictment against either. Jack the Ripper wasn’t called Jack the Mugger, for a reason. Jeffrey Dahmer didn’t sell body parts, he ate them. Osama bin Laden, abandoned a very lucrative career in the family business to live in caves and plot murder. Rape, I’m told, is not a get-rich-quick scheme, racists do not collect a royalty every time they use the “n-word,” and stalkers aren’t universally interested in getting their prey’s PIN number. Do I really need to go on?"

Jonah Goldberg, Leading #Trump hater

http://www.nationalreview.com/artic...ption-hillary-clinton-bill-clinton-love-power
 
The only proof that he has that he is an economist is his posts which sound exactly like most of the intelligentsia that currently controls the universities and pretends to teach our children while at the same time indoctrinating them with a hateful intolerance that would make Hitler (Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot, #BlackLiversMatter) proud.

If he wants to claim to be a university professor of economics, that I would be inclined to believe especially with his love of Arab violence against Jews.

:cool:

Anyone here think he even knows who Wicksteed is?
 
Back
Top