Hey Lovecraft68 I call you out dude

[LJ_Reloaded]

https://66.media.tumblr.com/25d021a2340980fab43b3fdb92149626/tumblr_moo6urWIJg1swzsk4o1_400.jpg
Only men can rape, women cannot. So says feminism. Uncle Ruckus says there is only one kind of feminism... so this is all his feminism.

 

[Sean Renaud]

No, not so says feminism. For starters that's a conservative speaking and knocking liberals. Which party to ladies vote for? Especially the ones who want equal rights? Sorry you are simply incorrect.

More importantly it's ignorance and fairly widespread ignorance at that.

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

No, not so says feminism. For starters that's a conservative speaking and knocking liberals. Which party to ladies vote for? Especially the ones who want equal rights? Sorry you are simply incorrect.

More importantly it's ignorance and fairly widespread ignorance at that.

Wrong again.

https://soundcloud.com/889-wers/male-rape

Theresa Phung: "For the men who are traumatized by their experiences because they were forced against their will to vaginally penetrate a woman.."
Dr. Mary P. Koss: "How would that happen...how would that happen by force or threat of force or when the victim is unable to consent? How does that happen?"
Theresa Phung: "So I am actually speaking to someone right now. his story is that he was drugged, he was unconscious and when he awoke a woman was on top of him with his penis inserted inside her vagina, and for him that was traumatizing.
Dr. Mary P. Koss: "Yeah."
Theresa Phung: "If he was drugged what would that be called?"
Dr. Mary P. Koss: "What would I call it? I would call it 'unwanted contact'."
Theresa Phung: "Just 'unwanted contact' period?"
Dr. Mary P. Koss: "Yeah."

Mary P Koss is a feminist. I can imagine you'd think she sounds like a Conservative because, you guessed it, Conservatives say the same thing about women.

 

[Sean Renaud]

Wrong again.

https://soundcloud.com/889-wers/male-rape

Mary P Koss is a feminist. I can imagine you'd think she sounds like a Conservative because, you guessed it, Conservatives say the same thing about women.

I don't care if you claim she's a feminist or even if she is. That is a Conservative Argument and one that is steeped in ignorance. Ignorance that is shared by a large portion of society.

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CbkBs83UUAAVQ6y.jpg

 

[Sean Renaud]

Oh look a blatantly fake sign. Makes you wonder how many of the others are blatantly fake.

This is a problem and one that is being changed as we speak.

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

I don't care if you claim she's a feminist or even if she is. That is a Conservative Argument and one that is steeped in ignorance. Ignorance that is shared by a large portion of society.

Nah, fool, feminism says men cannot be raped and women cannot rape. Fundamental law of their hypocritical ideology.

Oh look a blatantly fake sign. Makes you wonder how many of the others are blatantly fake.

This is a problem and one that is being changed as we speak.

That's not fake and you know it. This is mainstream feminism, dude, and the problem of women getting shorter sentences than men for the same crime isn't being changed. If anything it's probably getting worse.

 

[Sean Renaud]

No we both know that it's fake, you can pretend otherwise but we know that it's fake as fuck. I'd love to see some evidence that it's getting worse not better.

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cel0sXGWIAAtMiW.jpg
Feminists believe that the accusation is the proof. Due process is misogyny in the world of feminism. Feminism and Jim Crow are now one and the same.

 

[Sean Renaud]

Some do, and those bitches are scum. The reality however is an alarming number of rapists get away with it. I can't imagine seeing it day in and day out and not getting upset.

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

https://www.theguardian.com/comment...deserve-unprejudiced-justice-judge?CMP=twt_gu

Juries have no place at rape trials - victims deserve unprejudiced justice - Julie Bindel

The myths surrounding rape in our society are deep-rooted, persuasive and perpetuated daily in the media. As a result, many offenders are walking free

Almost a decade ago I wrote that rape might as well be legal. I feel the same way today. In 2013-14 in England and Wales, about 16,000 rapes were recorded by police, but only a third of these cases were sent to the Crown Prosecution Service. Approximately 15% of the recorded offences resulted in a charge. The actual attrition rate – meaning from reporting to conviction – is estimated at about 6%.

One potential solution to this worrying state of affairs is to do away with jurors in sex crime trials, and appoint a specially trained judge. I am wholly in favour of our jury system, but even more in favour of ensuring that rapists and other sex offenders do not walk free. New Zealand could be the first country to rid sex crime cases of jurors if one key recommendation from a recently published report by its Law Commission is implemented. The commissioners have suggested that there is a case for having sexual violence trials decided by a judge, either alone or with two expert “lay assessors”.

Why do away with one of the fundamentals of a decent justice system? Is the jury system not set up in order to better ensure fairness and justice, rather than relying on a crusty old Etonian in a wig?

Why? Because due process is the enemy of feminism.

And of course no feminists are denouncing this, anywhere.

 

[Sean Renaud]

No, because thanks to folks like you we don't really have due process. We have slut shamming and guys walking free. But that is your goal, saw another your you homies on the news the other day, got a work release. You should be proud, you're winning the war.

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

What's wrong with feminism in a single feminist cartoon
http://i.imgur.com/eS5NvzT.jpg
Typical mainstream feminist propaganda. The message here is that a man will see no use in rescuing a woman if his love turns out to be unrequited.

But there is another clear but unintended message that today’s feminism puts forth, that needs examining.

In this cartoon, some woman - a damsel in distress - faces an oversized threat. In response, she gets (or at best allows) some male to risk his life and stand between her and danger. Never once in the feminist mind does the woman think to grab her own sword and handle it herself, or even handle it alongside him, as you can clearly see here. And you know damned well that if that demon was coming for the man’s ass, she would expect him to handle it all by himself.

That’s how modern feminism works. Feminists are happy to be damsels in distress when they want to be lazy and use men as meat shields, but then they get mad when men want something in return for risking their lives. They call that entitlement, but they don’t see the using of men as meat shields as entitlement. See how female privilege works under today’s feminism?

 

[Sean Renaud]

That's supposed to be a man? I thought they were both women.

Not that that changes things women are continually bitching about th elack of powerful women in the media and this wasn't a hero it was a guy after pussy. The moment he found out he wasn't getting any he was more than happy to let her die. But of course since women are just walking vaginas to you I get why you think that way.

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

No, because thanks to folks like you we don't really have due process. We have slut shamming and guys walking free. But that is your goal, saw another your you homies on the news the other day, got a work release. You should be proud, you're winning the war.

You are a fool. These rapists aren't my homies unless you're also willing to admit that women who get away with raping men and feminists like Mary Koss who say men cannot be raped are your homies.

That's supposed to be a man? I thought they were both women.

Not that that changes things women are continually bitching about th elack of powerful women in the media and this wasn't a hero it was a guy after pussy. The moment he found out he wasn't getting any he was more than happy to let her die. But of course since women are just walking vaginas to you I get why you think that way.

Men are just walking wallets and meat shields to women. You seem to be quite happy with that. NEWS FLASH: we're not things. If we don't want to be a woman's meat shield we have the right not to be. But you would have that right taken away from us. You've made that abundantly clear with your little "women as walking vaginas" schtick.

Slaves, walking off the plantation...

Oh and how many times have I told you that I would rather see women replaced by sex robots when it comes to sex? I want to see the day where the concept of walking vaginas is not just morally repulsive, but in fact irrelevant.

Do you understand what irrelevant means? You should, it applies to you all the time.

 

[Sean Renaud]

I'm not a fool, if it were up to you they wouldn't even have gotten that slap on the wrist because they'd be too terrified to report the rape in the first place. You want them to be penalized when courts find their alledged attackers to be innocent. Meanwhile most reports claim that only a fraction of these people are ever even tried.

Exactly, you've said repeatedly you long for the day when women are obsolete.

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

I'm not a fool, if it were up to you they wouldn't even have gotten that slap on the wrist because they'd be too terrified to report the rape in the first place. You want them to be penalized when courts find their alledged attackers to be innocent. Meanwhile most reports claim that only a fraction of these people are ever even tried.

If a man pulled a false accusation like that I'd want him to be thrown in jail, too. So again what right do I want to take away from women that I would allow men?

Exactly, you've said repeatedly you long for the day when women are obsolete.

I've told you a hundred times, specifically, that women wouldn't be made obsolete by that any more than women were rendered obsolete by the washing machine. In fact you are insulting women by implying that sex robots would make women obsolete.

You either suck at reading or you are a persistent liar. Which is it?

 

[Sean Renaud]

The fact that more women are raped than men means this is taking something away from women.

You're the one who's wanted to make them obsolete.

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,3-1595494,00.html

Husband makes cheating wife pay for time spent raising lover's child
From Adam Sage in Paris
Times

A FRENCHMAN has won a ground-breaking ruling against his former wife and her lover, ordering them to pay back the money that he had spent on bringing up a child he had mistakenly assumed to be his own.

The man, named as G in the ruling, was awarded €23,000 (£15,600) after a DNA test revealed that he was not the father of the 13-year-old child, Astrid.

He had raised her as his own daughter, paying for her food, clothing, toys, schoolbooks and holidays, the Caen Appeal Court in Normandy said. It added that his former wife, B, from Cherbourg, had always had doubts about the identity of Astrid’s father: she was unsure whether it was her husband or her lover.

The judges said that she had committed a “fault” by failing to tell her husband that she had been having an affair at the time of the conception and that she did not know whose daughter Astrid was.

Fuck yeah. Don't just free him, drop the hammer on her ass. Send a message to all other lying women - paternity fraud is a civil fucking offense.

 

[Sean Renaud]

It is. But the damage he's doing to that little girl is child abuse.

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

It is. But the damage he's doing to that little girl is child abuse.

Typical, you want men to be enslaved by lying whores. The kid doesn't have to pay money for her treachery, he does, it's his money, his hard work, he should have the right not to be enslaved to fraud. That has absolute primacy.

This is proof that women have more legal rights than men.

The fact that more women are raped than men means this is taking something away from women.

Equal treatment under the law takes something away from women. You get stupider with every post.

You're the one who's wanted to make them obsolete.

I have never said anything like that. I have said women will not ever be obsolete, that is not what I want.

Again, you either suck at reading or you are a persistent liar. Which is it?

 

[Sean Renaud]

No, I want men to be "enslaved" by their loving children.

You've said exactly that, and repeated it above. That you long for that day, don't back down now.

 

[VaticanAssassin]

Sean.

Let this thread die.

regards,
VA

 

[Sean Renaud]

I've thought about it. I might actually do it. Of course you and all your friends could simply speed things along, we only need 4k more posts.

 

[Sean Renaud]

Well actually four thousand seventy five more posts but you get the picture.