The Soros Hack

LadyFunkenstein

Photoshopped
Joined
Jun 29, 2005
Posts
33,342
Who is reading them? I've only just begun. I wish a legit medium would cover them since there are a lot of docs to go through, but it seems they are being ignored due to revealing Clinton as the Billionaire's viceroy/whore we've always known her to be.

So far, few surprises as I see he was indeed an architect in flooding Europe with "refugees". (interestingly, this weekend I noticed new "Refugees Welcome" signs around Brooklyn; what do you know, he funded the organization behind them.

Please share relevant, interesting screen shots of what you learn in reading the DC Leaks dump.
 
Is there a non legit medium you could point me to in the meantime? It's always useful to know what a certain percentage of my Facebook feed is raving about.
 
Does it mention Soros' involvement in satanic worship and bizarre secret societies?
 
Last edited:
Nothing to see here folks. Please move on.

Social engineering in progress, so pardon the dust.....
 
The truth usually takes effort. Which is why this thread will die a quick death. No links telling people what to believe!

That's for sure. If you point them to a link that shows Soros had ties to Trump one half of the board will go wild with enthusiasm for the hacker. If he has ties to Clinton the other half of the board will do the same.
 
That link in itself looks like it wants to tell me what to believe.

The link is nothing more than a bunch of documents, documents posted without commentary beyond the opening page. If you don't want to read it, then don't. The link does not "want" to tell you anything as it is simply a link for you to do with as you wish.

And you wonder why I refused to post a link to an article instead of the docs themselves...

Open your mind and review the docs or don't bother. Either choice is legit. Your attack mode seems silly. Is Soros your dad or something?
 
I see tons of info on that site. How, exactly, are we guaranteed of its authenticity?
 
I see tons of info on that site. How, exactly, are we guaranteed of its authenticity?

We are not. Just like wiki leaks.

On the other hand if anything was false in the DNC emails do you think they would have just let it slide?

I have not seen Soros step up and deny either....
 
We are not. Just like wiki leaks.

On the other hand if anything was false in the DNC emails do you think they would have just let it slide?

Of course they would have.

No one goes to law enforcement and says, "Stupid police! You said the robber's getaway car was a Dodge truck, but I drive a Chevy! Ha!"
 
Of course they would have.

No one goes to law enforcement and says, "Stupid police! You said the robber's getaway car was a Dodge truck, but I drive a Chevy! Ha!"

So we agree the DNC are thieves just not in what they drove?
 
After the rathergate memos were shown to be obvious forgeries many Democrats still insist that although those actual forgeries were indeed forgeries, they were forgeries of what were real memos. the totally exhausted. And they know this because a guy told somebody that told the guy that told someone.
 
Back
Top