Here's How Donald Trump Could Become President

[phrodeau]

naturally. All those people that report as being under-employed are simply lazy

And the mall Santas blame Jesus for not having Christmas year-round.

 

[Conager]

go ahead and put a number to your words plenty of 40 hour jobs seeing as how the majority which means more than half of the jobs created during the economy economy work part-time jobs.

you do realize that a person can be underemployed and both not the field that he is were trained for but in this but also by way of the number of hours worked.

Over half of all recent college graduates cannot find any employment at all.

of those that do find employment over half of those are not working in the fields for which they sought education. Meaning less than 25% of all college graduates are working in a field that they train for half of those are less than 40 hours a week.

I'm using half with for several of the above examples the number is over half

and yes, Luke, I do realize that over half of the above sentences have errors in them.

 

[Conager]

And the mall Santas blame Jesus for not having Christmas year-round.

And people that worship your dogma crow about how great the Obama non-recovery is doing each and every Christmas when the retail and package delivery sectors provide a boost to the employment numbers

 

[toubab]

Has 2b00b fingered out how Drumpf can be President yet

Yes, by getting at least 270 electoral college votes. Not very likely, but possible.

 

[Conager]

I would say that the proof that idiocracy has arrived is the fact that there is a presidential candidate making reckless and irresponsible comments and people are still willing to vote for him.

Not to mention he hasn't shown that he is any way capable enough or informed enough to carry out the duties of the office.

You forgot to mention the datk, dark hatred.

 

[toubab]

I would say that the proof that idiocracy has arrived is the fact that there is a presidential candidate making reckless and irresponsible comments and people are still willing to vote for him.

Not to mention he hasn't shown that he is any way capable enough or informed enough to carry out the duties of the office.

And I would say the proof idiocracy has arrived is the fact Hillary Clinton is probably going to be the next president of the United States, if all these polls are to be believed.

 

[Adre]

And I would say the proof idiocracy has arrived is the fact Hillary Clinton is probably going to be the next president of the United States, if all these polls are to be believed.

No, the proof came with Sarah Palin even being on a ticket.

 

[patient1]

And I would say the proof idiocracy has arrived is the fact Hillary Clinton is probably going to be the next president of the United States, if all these polls are to be believed.

And for that I will blame both parties, as well as the press which anointed this
"choose the form of the destructor" scenario.

 

[Conager]

No, the proof came with Sarah Palin even being on a ticket.

Officially, only when Republicans are elected and the first "documented" case was when Dan Quayle used a correct, alternate spelling of the singular for potatoes.

The racist idea that the current occupant of 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue might be less than bright was completely debunked when it was clearly shown that his comment about the 57 states was a simple misSTATEment."

It is easy to know who the smart politicians are, simply remember it thusly:

"D" stands for "not Dumb."

"R" stands for "Retarded."

 

[toubab]

No, the proof came with Sarah Palin even being on a ticket.

Hard to argue with that.

 

[toubab]

And for that I will blame both parties, as well as the press which anointed this
"choose the form of the destructor" scenario.

Can't argue with that, either. You could not be more correct.

 

[Adre]

Officially, only when Republicans are elected and the first "documented" case was when Dan Quayle used a correct, alternate spelling of the singular for potatoes.

The racist idea that the current occupant of 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue might be less than bright was completely debunked when it was clearly shown that his comment about the 57 states was a simple misSTATEment."

It is easy to know who the smart politicians are, simply remember it thusly:

"D" stands for "not Dumb."

"R" stands for "Retarded."

All this because I implied Sarah is a bit dim?

 

[toubab]

Officially, only when Republicans are elected and the first "documented" case was when Dan Quayle used a correct, alternate spelling of the singular for potatoes.

The racist idea that the current occupant of 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue might be less than bright was completely debunked when it was clearly shown that his comment about the 57 states was a simple misSTATEment."

It is easy to know who the smart politicians are, simply remember it thusly:

"D" stands for "not Dumb."

"R" stands for "Retarded."

Press bias is obvious. Back in 1992 the press were polled after the election, and well over 90% voted for Bill Clinton. There have been no more such polls done, for obvious reasons.

 

[phrodeau]

go ahead and put a number to your words plenty of 40 hour jobs seeing as how the majority which means more than half of the jobs created during the economy economy work part-time jobs.

you do realize that a person can be underemployed and both not the field that he is were trained for but in this but also by way of the number of hours worked.

Over half of all recent college graduates cannot find any employment at all.

of those that do find employment over half of those are not working in the fields for which they sought education. Meaning less than 25% of all college graduates are working in a field that they train for half of those are less than 40 hours a week.

I'm using half with for several of the above examples the number is over half

and yes, Luke, I do realize that over half of the above sentences have errors in them.

I didn't say that there are plenty of 40-hour jobs. I said that if a person wants to work 40 hours a week, he can find jobs so that he'll get that, maybe two or three jobs.

Now, I've never heard Donald Trump say that he's going to create more jobs for college graduates, only that he'll create jobs building walls and roads or milling steel and putting up more empty skyscrapers.

 

[zipman]

And I would say the proof idiocracy has arrived is the fact Hillary Clinton is probably going to be the next president of the United States, if all these polls are to be believed.

There's a huge difference between Hillary is who corrupt and Trump who is utterly incompetent.

Or should I say there's a Yuge difference?

 

[coati]

Press bias is obvious. Back in 1992 the press were polled after the election, and well over 90% voted for Bill Clinton. There have been no more such polls done, for obvious reasons.

I agree that overall, the press tends to be biased in favor of the less dumb option. In many elections, we tend to be choosing between dumb and dumber.

In this presidential election, fair and balanced does not mean that a mean-spirited, impulsive, and divisive candidate will be granted equal credence in media coverage. On the contrary, it is the responsibility of the media to expose such characteristics, for the same reason that any good interviewer would want to know about basic red-flag personality traits when conducting a job interview.

And it is the responsibility of the media to not back away from exposing such characteristics, just because the candidate whines about the media holding him accountable for his statements.

 

[Conager]

I didn't say that there are plenty of 40-hour jobs. I said that if a person wants to work 40 hours a week, he can find jobs so that he'll get that, maybe two or three jobs.

Now, I've never heard Donald Trump say that he's going to create more jobs for college graduates, only that he'll create jobs building walls and roads or milling steel and putting up more empty skyscrapers.

Very nice back-pedal.

You also stumbled over the truth of the Obama jobs numbers beyond just ignoring those that have given up: it takes three 28 hour a week jobs to more or less equal two 40 hour a week jobs. Kind of tough to find two jobs that dovetail schedules nicely and, of course, you have 4 different commutes a day. That'll help climate continue to change.

I agree that overall, the press tends to be biased in favor of the less dumb option. In many elections, we tend to be choosing between dumb and dumber.

In this presidential election, fair and balanced does not mean that a mean-spirited, impulsive, and divisive candidate will be granted equal credence in media coverage. On the contrary, it is the responsibility of the media to expose such characteristics, for the same reason that any good interviewer would want to know about basic red-flag personality traits when conducting a job interview.

And it is the responsibility of the media to not back away from exposing such characteristics, just because the candidate whines about the media holding him accountable for his statements.

Yes, blind indoctrination of the masses by those "smart" people in the media guiding us to the "smart" choice sounds like the "smart" way to go. You sure are smart to be able to find yourself in agreement with the propaganda you acknowledge you are being spoon-fed! Sig, 0Heil!

Kind of his studies show that the indoctrination by demonstrably heavily liberal leaning college professors has the oh-so-surprising side effect of turning out "smart" college graduates that just happen vote liberal, which is, naturally, just the smart choice for "educated" citizens.

Progress, comrade! Peace, order, and good government!

 

[Disgustipated]

Who Are the Underemployed?

Even the real Sam Elliot. On a failed Netflix show with Ashton Kutcher and that ginger from That 70's Show.

 

[phrodeau]

(edited)

Very nice back-pedal.

Yeah, I had to back-pedal so you could get caught up.

 

[Que]

Yeah, I had to back-pedal so you could get caught up.

Yes, because your random selection of "40 hours," the traditional work week of those that have found full-time employment, was obviously intended to convey the idea that the solution to the 28 hour work week directly caused by tbe strictures of Obamacare would be to "simply" find yet another part-time job.

Still the undefeated champion of the meaningless internet quarrel?

 

[Ishmael]

Yes, because your random selection of "40 hours," the traditional work week of those that have found full-time employment, was obviously intended to convey the idea that the solution to the 28 hour work week directly caused by tbe strictures of Obamacare would be to "simply" find yet another part-time job.

Still the undefeated champion of the meaningless internet quarrel?

The trick is to find two jobs, without conflicting work hours, that would allow an individual a relatively normal life.

But with all of the benefits to be garnered, why would anyone take a job that paid less than $40K (+/-) a year?

And it's going to get worse. A culling is coming.

Ishmael

 

[toubab]

I agree that overall, the press tends to be biased in favor of the less dumb option. In many elections, we tend to be choosing between dumb and dumber.

In this presidential election, fair and balanced does not mean that a mean-spirited, impulsive, and divisive candidate will be granted equal credence in media coverage. On the contrary, it is the responsibility of the media to expose such characteristics, for the same reason that any good interviewer would want to know about basic red-flag personality traits when conducting a job interview.

And it is the responsibility of the media to not back away from exposing such characteristics, just because the candidate whines about the media holding him accountable for his statements.

I think it's extremely obvious the press is biased in favor of the Democratic candidate, regardless who that candidate is, and regardless who the Republican candidate is. The press is overwhelmingly liberal, and the Democratic presidential candidate is always more liberal, in the eyes of the press and of most people, than the Republican candidate. That's the key, not which candidate is "dumber" than the other.

 

[Ishmael]

I agree that overall, the press tends to be biased in favor of the less dumb option. In many elections, we tend to be choosing between dumb and dumber.

In this presidential election, fair and balanced does not mean that a mean-spirited, impulsive, and divisive candidate will be granted equal credence in media coverage. On the contrary, it is the responsibility of the media to expose such characteristics, for the same reason that any good interviewer would want to know about basic red-flag personality traits when conducting a job interview.

And it is the responsibility of the media to not back away from exposing such characteristics, just because the candidate whines about the media holding him accountable for his statements.

OK, and shouldn't the press also be investigating and reporting criminal behavior? Further, the press is actively reporting "their interpretation" of one of the candidates words as fact.

Ishmael

 

[sigh]

Oh c'mon, guys. The press MADE Donald Trump. They followed and salivated over everything he said or did. And he ate it up. He didn't bother raising any money because he didn't think he needed to. To a TV star, any news is good, so he made all the news he could by being as outrageous as he could. But now, way too late in the game, he's discovered that the strategy that allowed him to peck down his many opponents in the primaries isn't playing as well on the national level. So what's he do now? Cry foul and complain that the media is being mean to him. The man flips from bully to victim so fast I'm surprised his neck hasn't snapped.

As for Clinton, I don't know what some of you are missing, but I hear her name day after day after day (year after year) and the press has been anything but kind to her. I'm not saying I don't think she deserves it, but I'm most certainly saying she's gotten her share and then some of the dark side of the limelight. While the media was building Donald Trump, they were tearing down RHC. And what we ended up with are the two most disliked candidates in history, for the most important and dangerous position of our time. Why don't we just agree to be pissed at our media about that?

 

[Que]

Oh c'mon, guys. The press MADE Donald Trump. They followed and salivated over everything he said or did. And he ate it up. He didn't bother raising any money because he didn't think he needed to. To a TV star, any news is good, so he made all the news he could by being as outrageous as he could. But now, way too late in the game, he's discovered that the strategy that allowed him to peck down his many opponents in the primaries isn't playing as well on the national level. So what's he do now? Cry foul and complain that the media is being mean to him. The man flips from bully to victim so fast I'm surprised his neck hasn't snapped.

As for Clinton, I don't know what some of you are missing, but I hear her name day after day after day (year after year) and the press has been anything but kind to her. I'm not saying I don't think she deserves it, but I'm most certainly saying she's gotten her share and then some of the dark side of the limelight. While the media was building Donald Trump, they were tearing down RHC. And what we ended up with are the two most disliked candidates in history, for the most important and dangerous position of our time. Why don't we just agree to be pissed at our media about that?

The press always builds up the candidate they hope will lose to the DNC candidat until the day he clinches the GOP nomination. How is this season any different?

And please, the press gets their verbiage directly from the Clinton campaign. Any remotely negative coverage was planned for early inoculation so in typical clintonian fashion, by the general election they can ignore it as "old news" and "irrelevant."