numeniusa's boudoir

Status
Not open for further replies.
:D

I think we Brits are rather rubbish at pet names, to be honest. It's all 'snookums' and 'squidgy' and so on. Not in my house, thankfully, but still.

I do like 'nymph', though, thanks to Lizzie for that one!

Nice plans for the weekend, Amal?

Well, I just posted some writing. Otherwise I will be getting ready to report for work on Monday. I think you might like what I just wrote.
 
Which is the position you were pondering? From the audio you linked, the 'from behind'?

Well......... out here....? ......... ok. There is a position that I think is called a reverse missionary where the man is on his back legs spread and the woman takes him.

This would sort of be reverse doggy, but it would not leave a lot for the woman to play with for deep penetration. Could be enough, but not sure if ladies would find it interesting at all.
 
so let me see if I understand this: you want me in a bow tie and cuffs, and to serve you my chilled manhood in a crystal glass....ok....

Chilled manhood? Wait, no, don't put that in the chiller, where'd it go? :eek: I'm worried you're going to get frostbite now...
 
Well, I just posted some writing. Otherwise I will be getting ready to report for work on Monday. I think you might like what I just wrote.

I found it... :devil: What a picture you paint with your words... *fans self*

I need to read it again before I can comment coherently. Or even focus. Yes, that's what I need to do...
 
Well......... out here....? ......... ok. There is a position that I think is called a reverse missionary where the man is on his back legs spread and the woman takes him.

This would sort of be reverse doggy, but it would not leave a lot for the woman to play with for deep penetration. Could be enough, but not sure if ladies would find it interesting at all.

Don't be shy... ;) I love discussing this sort of thing here, you never know who might turn up with a pertinent comment or some practical experience!

I found these definitions:

Reverse missionary:
"previously having sexual intercourse in the doggy style position, then the male pushes the female down onto her stomach and pulls her legs back; the missionary position with the female on her stomach"

Reverse doggy:
"Sexual position where the guy bends over in front of the girl and sticks his dick back through his legs to fuck her"

I'm not sure either of those has the man on his back, though, so it may not be entirely what you mean.

The first is appealing, especially with a cushion under my stomach. The feeling of being 'pinned down' in that position is very powerful for me. The second, though, I'm not sure - I'd be worried that the man would do himself some damage bending his cock down and back like that :eek:

'Just inside' penetration can be incredible though, it doesn't always have to be deep ;)
 
Don't be shy... ;) I love discussing this sort of thing here, you never know who might turn up with a pertinent comment or some practical experience!

I found these definitions:

Reverse missionary:
"previously having sexual intercourse in the doggy style position, then the male pushes the female down onto her stomach and pulls her legs back; the missionary position with the female on her stomach"

Reverse doggy:
"Sexual position where the guy bends over in front of the girl and sticks his dick back through his legs to fuck her"

I'm not sure either of those has the man on his back, though, so it may not be entirely what you mean.

The first is appealing, especially with a cushion under my stomach. The feeling of being 'pinned down' in that position is very powerful for me. The second, though, I'm not sure - I'd be worried that the man would do himself some damage bending his cock down and back like that :eek:

'Just inside' penetration can be incredible though, it doesn't always have to be deep ;)

Hmmm... ok... look for the position with the man in woman's position for missionary... true reversal ... not missionary upside down.

So... "Just inside" could be interesting? How about the dominance aspect of taking him. Would it perhaps lead you to think of other ways to take him??
 
Don't be shy... ;) I love discussing this sort of thing here, you never know who might turn up with a pertinent comment or some practical experience!

I found these definitions:

Reverse missionary:
"previously having sexual intercourse in the doggy style position, then the male pushes the female down onto her stomach and pulls her legs back; the missionary position with the female on her stomach"

Reverse doggy:
"Sexual position where the guy bends over in front of the girl and sticks his dick back through his legs to fuck her"

I'm not sure either of those has the man on his back, though, so it may not be entirely what you mean.

The first is appealing, especially with a cushion under my stomach. The feeling of being 'pinned down' in that position is very powerful for me. The second, though, I'm not sure - I'd be worried that the man would do himself some damage bending his cock down and back like that :eek:

'Just inside' penetration can be incredible though, it doesn't always have to be deep ;)

You've given me a hard on, Numi........
 
Don't be shy... ;) I love discussing this sort of thing here, you never know who might turn up with a pertinent comment or some practical experience!

I found these definitions:

Reverse missionary:
"previously having sexual intercourse in the doggy style position, then the male pushes the female down onto her stomach and pulls her legs back; the missionary position with the female on her stomach"

Reverse doggy:
"Sexual position where the guy bends over in front of the girl and sticks his dick back through his legs to fuck her"

I'm not sure either of those has the man on his back, though, so it may not be entirely what you mean.

The first is appealing, especially with a cushion under my stomach. The feeling of being 'pinned down' in that position is very powerful for me. The second, though, I'm not sure - I'd be worried that the man would do himself some damage bending his cock down and back like that :eek:

'Just inside' penetration can be incredible though, it doesn't always have to be deep ;)

I think I may have to travel to England for a 1-on-1 workshop to test these positions Lady Numi
 
I found it... :devil: What a picture you paint with your words... *fans self*

I need to read it again before I can comment coherently. Or even focus. Yes, that's what I need to do...

Oh... perhaps I want to know THAT position instead!
 
Hmmm... ok... look for the position with the man in woman's position for missionary... true reversal ... not missionary upside down.

So... "Just inside" could be interesting? How about the dominance aspect of taking him. Would it perhaps lead you to think of other ways to take him??

Well, although it's way less common than the other way around, I do enjoy tying my man up sometimes and using him for my pleasure :devil: When he's restrained on his back, lots of ways to 'take him' are at my disposal ;)
 
I think I may have to travel to England for a 1-on-1 workshop to test these positions Lady Numi

Yes! Let's workshop this. We'll have this all properly documented in ... ooh ... How much annual leave do you have left? :D
 
I am sporting a very evil grin now, Jaime :devil: I wonder precisely what caused that. The definitions? Or the 'just inside' penetration concept...

Deffo the just inside. My glans is much thicker than the shaft so the maximum stretch is immediate. Loitering around the vaginal vestibule is hot for both of us.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top