Who is officially with her (Hillary)?

[SEVERUSMAX]

If you are, say so and why.

I'm with her......because I didn't just recently join the Democratic Party to abandon it when my preferred candidate loses. What the hell kind of Democrat would I be then?

I'm with her.....because we really need to keep You Know Who out of the White House (no, not Voldemort, but damn close).

I'm with her, because despite what some may claim, I believe that she has honestly turned around on LGBT rights.

I'm with her, because she agreed to the most progressive platform in living memory of any major party.

I'm with her, because it's time for a public option in ACA. High time.

I'm with her, because after realizing that I was on the wrong side of history with the GOP in the past, I'm in no hurry to jump back into bed with them, certainly not now.

I'm with her, because while she has all-too-human flaws, like most politicians, she's no Russian puppet.

 

[underguy1]

Pathetic.

 

[Iceprincess12]

If you are, say so and why.

I'm with her......because I didn't just recently join the Democratic Party to abandon it when my preferred candidate loses. What the hell kind of Democrat would I be then?

I'm with her.....because we really need to keep You Know Who out of the White House (no, not Voldemort, but damn close).

I'm with her, because despite what some may claim, I believe that she has honestly turned around on LGBT rights.

I'm with her, because she agreed to the most progressive platform in living memory of any major party.

I'm with her, because it's time for a public option in ACA. High time.

I'm with her, because after realizing that I was on the wrong side of history with the GOP in the past, I'm in no hurry to jump back into bed with them, certainly not now.

I'm with her, because while she has all-too-human flaws, like most politicians, she's no Russian puppet.

Are you gay? Just wondering. 6 out of your 7 statements showed up on my gaydar. Maybe you meant to post this under the "straight men who suck cock but really are not straight" thread. No, I don't dislike or have a fear of gays. I often wonder why 2 dogs in a bun hasn't caught on.

http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5221/5596118141_153b6a9d8f.jpg

 

[JackLuis]

I have to say that I'm voting for her lesser Evil. Much as I am loathed to admit it.
If she realigns the Supreme Court and has a stroke in 2019, I'll figure my vote wasn't wasted.

I want Liz to run in 2020!

 

[underguy1]

I have to say that I'm voting for her lesser Evil. Much as I am loathed to admit it.
If she realigns the Supreme Court and has a stroke in 2019, I'll figure my vote wasn't wasted.

I want Liz to run in 2020!

The heinous war criminal Hillary Clinton's nomination is the result of decades of lesser evilism.

And is she really less evil?

I'm far from convinced. She seems to be evil personified.

 

[Liar]

If you are, say so and why.

I'm with her......because I didn't just recently join the Democratic Party to abandon it when my preferred candidate loses. What the hell kind of Democrat would I be then?

I'm with her.....because we really need to keep You Know Who out of the White House (no, not Voldemort, but damn close).

I'm with her, because despite what some may claim, I believe that she has honestly turned around on LGBT rights.

I'm with her, because she agreed to the most progressive platform in living memory of any major party.

I'm with her, because it's time for a public option in ACA. High time.

I'm with her, because after realizing that I was on the wrong side of history with the GOP in the past, I'm in no hurry to jump back into bed with them, certainly not now.

I'm with her, because while she has all-too-human flaws, like most politicians, she's no Russian puppet.

By the sound of it, this is for you.

https://images.lookhuman.com/render/standard/cXr9k6MDPtjpsJojde2aIn6Ovm65btuR/3200bc-white_blue-z1-t-i-m-with-her-i-guess.png

 

[Liar]

...which is fine. Don't get me wrong. There are plenty who will vote for her becuase they think the platform she runs on is acceptable, and plenty who will vote for her because the only other elecatble option at this time is batshit crazy. And who either don't buy into the "Hillary is evil and crooked" narrative, or just don't think that's all that important.

I just haven't heard any riveting endorsments of her from any regular voters. The best I've heard so far is "Hillary? Not my first choice, but sure, fine, whatever, she'll do."

 

[seth6138]

as long as 50.1% of us are with her...we will be safe

 

[BotanyBoy]

as long as 50.1% of us are with her...we will be safe

We won't be safe, it's just the kind of scum and shit she'll dish us will be predictable.

War in the middle east.....

1st chance she gets she's going to let her billionaire buddies all rat fuck the economy/people.

Because of that opportunity, upward mobility and wealth inequality will continue to become bigger problems faster and faster.

In 4 years she'll make the SAME promises she broke up and down the list and the fucking retards in this country will re-electer her for 4 more years.

After that we'll do it again with the next Sachs/JPMorgan/Time Warner/UofCalifornia employee.

I just hope the (R)'s hold congress and keep the whole thing cockblocked so she can't really do too much damage.

 

[lovecraft68]

We won't be safe, it's just the kind of scum and shit she'll dish us will be predictable.

War in the middle east.....

1st chance she gets she's going to let her billionaire buddies all rat fuck the economy/people.

Because of that opportunity, upward mobility and wealth inequality will continue to become bigger problems faster and faster.

In 4 years she'll make the SAME promises she broke up and down the list and the fucking retards in this country will re-electer her for 4 more years.

After that we'll do it again with the next Sachs/JPMorgan/Time Warner/UofCalifornia employee.

I just hope the (R)'s hold congress and keep the whole thing cockblocked so she can't really do too much damage.

Pretty much this.

I'm not a Trump fan, but it blows my mind people think this woman is a decent human being never mind candidate. What's more mind boggling is women thinking she's for them. She takes millions from countries that don't allow their women to read and don't acknowledge rape as a crime and her husband is a dog in heat sex offender that she's stayed with to get her right where she is now. Yup, that's the role model young women need right there.

I hope they both get shot before the election.

Sanders should have run as an Indy. He would have got all the "Are you fucking kidding with these two" Votes.

 

[NeverEndingMe]

how do we know hillary is a woman?

hell, we know that Bill Clinton refused to have sex with it


Hillary, because fraud and corruption are good!

 

[Sean Renaud]

And then he would have put Trump in the White House which I don't believe he wants.

 

[BotanyBoy]

Pretty much this.

I'm not a Trump fan, but it blows my mind people think this woman is a decent human being never mind candidate. What's more mind boggling is women thinking she's for them. She takes millions from countries that don't allow their women to read and don't acknowledge rape as a crime and her husband is a dog in heat sex offender that she's stayed with to get her right where she is now. Yup, that's the role model young women need right there.

I hope they both get shot before the election.

Sanders should have run as an Indy. He would have got all the "Are you fucking kidding with these two" Votes.

OMG they act like she's the second coming of Christ or some shit....the fucking savior of mankind's eternal souls!!!

That would be nice.

He should have. I wish Johnson would win but the idea of freedom in ANY form sends the nanny state control freak types into fuckin' fits.

"Can't just pick your nose!! You need a permit for that!! The fact that we let people wipe their own butts without a state licenced contractor there to assist them is INSANE. These things are for your safety!!"

 

[JackLuis]

Hillary Clinton: The Neocon in Democrat's Clothing
http://www.truth-out.org/images/images_2016_05/2016_0527clinton.jpg

The next president of the United States will almost certainly be a Republican. No, not the one everyone in the media rejects, the buffoon named Donald Trump who stands no chance of shaking the hands of world leaders. Chances are, the next Republican president will be a woman, and yes, her name will be Hillary Clinton.

No kidding, if this comes to pass, history will be made: the first woman president and among the first Republican neocons in Democratic garb. Everyone knows the expression "a wolf in sheep's clothing." Now, it seems the United States will invent the macho Republican in feminist, Democratic clothing.

She's not a Eisenhower Republican though, she much more hawkish.

 

[JackLuis]

Noam Chomsky explains the value of holding your nose and voting for Hillary

No one can accuse famed linguist and activist Noam Chomsky of being a corporate sell out.

At the same time, he’s not above acknowledging the cold, hard realities of electoral politics.

In a piece posted at AlterNet, Chomsky outlines an eight-point rationale for progressives who live in swing states to accept voting for the “lesser evil,” which in Chomsky’s mind is Democrat Hillary Clinton.

It isn’t that Chomsky is supportive of Clinton — indeed, he’s particularly critical of her interventionist foreign policy streak. Rather, he thinks that the dangers posed by a Trump presidency are so great that accepting a “lesser evil” option is vital to the future of the entire planet.

But the most compelling point Chomsky makes is that voting shouldn’t be seen as a moral act, but as a strategic necessity aimed at preventing the worst possible outcome.

“Voting should not be viewed as a form of personal self-expression or moral judgement directed in retaliation towards major party candidates who fail to reflect our values, or of a corrupt system designed to limit choices to those acceptable to corporate elites,” he writes.

"Vote For Hillary, she's not the worst!"

 

[Boxlicker101]

The only positive thing I can say about Hillary is that she's not Trump. The only positive thing I can say about Trump is that he's not Hillary.

Hopefully, a meteor will strike the place where they are holding the first debate and kill them both. Others would die too, and that would be a tragedy, but at least we would have gotten rid of these two disasters.

 

[JackLuis]

Rand Paul: CIA Annex In Benghazi Shipped Arms From Libya To Syria; Clinton Lied About It

Finally we are getting to the real issue in Bengazi. That is the impounding of Libyan weapons and shipping them to Syria. So I ask why Drumph isn't pursuing this line of accusation rather than the bullshit he is spreading? Could it be that he is a Clinton plant to disrupt the discussion and GOP so Hillary doesn't have to actually explain her actions?

Sen. Rand Paul says that Hillary Clinton deserves five years in prison for lying to Congress about the true nature of the CIA operation in Benghazi that was attacked by terrorists in 2012.

Under oath before Congress in 2013, Hillary Clinton answered a question from Sen. Paul, saying she knew nothing about the weapons shipments from Libya to Syria.

However, WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange said last months that his next release of Clinton emails may prove that this is not true.

If Wikileaks has the smoking gun e-mail, why has he not published it? Could it be that he hasn't got it, or that it is a bit thin in nailing her coffin shut?

 

[underguy1]

The GOP never wanted the truth about Benghazi out there. The whole inquiry was an exercise in obfuscation and misdirection.

Just like the 28 pages on the Saudi connection to 9/11.

They're all in on it together. They just have to make the theatre look exciting enough to fool the population.

 

[kaitlyn_sun]

I would LIKE to live in a world where my politicians are good, moral people who never have to obfuscate the lines between good guy and bad guy in order to do their job successfully.

But, failing that, I want someone who is willing to do hardcore morally questionable stuff to make my country awesome. We've had old white dudes doing it for years, but they never did it in the name of issues that I supported.

Now We get a badass bitch who has been a fucking LINEMAN for feminism for decades who is clearly going to do some underhanded gray-morality shit, but all of her platforms are ones that I agree with. I love the idea of getting behind a woman who has been dodging the patriarchy's bullshit since the seventies and watching her greenlight the same moral shitbaggery they've been doing forever.

Obama made me feel good. Hilary makes me feel like a warrior.

 

[Blue]

I don't see why you all are even planning to vote. If there was a scale of bad-politicians, 0 being Gandhi and 100 being a cross between Akkad and Hitler, Trump is probably a 92 and Clinton's an 80. Trump will be a worse president, but hardly by much, so why don't you all just not even bother voting? Then when everything inevitably burns to the ground nobody can say that you were even partly responsible for it.

~Britain

 

[Sean Renaud]

Except Hillary is barely past the 50/50 marker and in truth Trump would maybe be a 65.

 

[JackLuis]

Lesser Of Two Evils Is A Lie, Shocking Police Ignorance, Global Arms Trade

Lee Camp explains the issues and he's not main stream media.

 

[about_average]

I quit voting for the lesser of two evils many years ago. I'm not sure who I'll vote for, but definitely not Clinton or Trump.
If I can, I'll write in Sanders/Gabbard

 

[NeverEndingMe]

Hillary Clinton, picking up where Enron left off

because corruption and fraud are good and democrats voters are stupid

 

[Sean Renaud]

I quit voting for the lesser of two evils many years ago. I'm not sure who I'll vote for, but definitely not Clinton or Trump.
If I can, I'll write in Sanders/Gabbard

You can, you'll just be helping the opposing force. I swear this is goddamn math people.