Libs venom against Trump. And who they should be afraid of...

[eyerami]

What would make all lemmings on both sides of the partisan piece of crap coin shit their wannabe britches is if both The Donald and Billary aren't around November 8...

...Trump stepping-down in disgrace first, then Clintonia indicted on multiple counts second.



Doesn't matter...

This is all about the USSA going down, anyway.

 

[LincolnDuncan]

I am not defending him, OK? But I do find it interesting how they can't seem to keep there incredible hatred for him at bay. They hate all Republicans, but this is different. This hate is without rival. They send their Brown Shirts to disrupt his rallies with shouts and sometimes violence. Not very classy. This guy looks like his head is about to explode like in the movie Scanners.

Early on, they used their normal bag of tricks, accusing him of a vast array of *phobias, racist (their favorite), stupid, ignorant and so on. But is didn't stick. In fact, it improved his popularity because he never backs down. The more they pore it on, the more he and his supporters dig in their heels. Libs are besides themselves with this guy.

Now don't think because I say this I am a 'Trumper'. I am independant and usually reserve my vote up until the last week before ballets go in. This is an observation.

But IMO, Libs and Dems should be more afraid of Clinton Inc. None of them will be left standing who does not voice support for her. Even Uncle Bernie is afraid of her, don't think he isn't. So he 'sold out' and supports her even though she represents everything he has been fighting against for thirty years. . He was tolerated just to make it look like Hillary was earning the nomination. But finally it was time to real him in.

He's a clown who comes up with new material everyday! We should pay him for this entertainment.

 

[renard_ruse]

I'm independent. I think both sides are full of nothing but interest group controlled money grubbing bastards all full of themselves and not really giving two shits about the constituents that gave them power. But we have a two party system what ya gonna do?

Trump is not about interest group controlled money. He just turned down Koch brothers money. The media completely ignored that.

They can claim he's "in it for himself" which I think is ridiculous, this is costing him money and business deals, but you CANNOT honestly claim his a lackey of interest group money. He's just a guy who ran for President and struck a cord with a lot of people.

 

[renard_ruse]

He's a clown who comes up with new material everyday! We should pay him for this entertainment.

Um, no, the media distorts everything he says and takes a half sentence or two out of context, repeats it as a screaming headline, and idiots like you think its true.

Have you listened to any Trump speeches from beginning to end? If not, you know nothing and are just spouting crap the media and the DNC have pumped into your head.

 

[LincolnDuncan]

Um, no, the media distorts everything he says and takes a half sentence or two out of context, repeats it as a screaming headline, and idiots like you think its true.

Have you listened to any Trump speeches from beginning to end? If not, you know nothing and are just spouting crap the media and the DNC have pumped into your head.

I agree totally about the media including the right, but I have listened to speeches and debates. He's a clown and knows very little about the world. Putin is jerking off waiting for him.

 

[eyerami]

Trump is not about interest group controlled money. He just turned down Koch brothers money. The media completely ignored that.

Bullshit, renard: the Kochs are intentionally and clearly on "media" record as stating they want nothing politically to do with The Donald, and they are the monied-soul of the Republican Party. If the Kochs wished to give Trump their cash, The Donald would take every penny of it.

 

[Colonel Hogan]

Hillary Clinton is not a perfect candidate, as Toubab and Botany Boy seem to delight in reminding us every single fucking day.

Hell, she's not even a perfect Democrat!

But as Bernie Sanders has said, "Hillary Clinton on her worst day is better than Donald Trump on his best day".

I will vote for Hillary Clinton on Election day, flaws and all.

And mainstream Republicans who did virtually everything possible to derail the Trump nomination short of getting into bed with Ted Cruz and sucking his dick are now making exactly the same comparison about Hillary and the Donald, but in reverse.

And that encapsulates the sad state of affairs represented by this election. The country WILL survive the election of either candidate, but it will not be pleasant.

 

[BotanyBoy]

And mainstream Republicans who did virtually everything possible to derail the Trump nomination short of getting into bed with Ted Cruz and sucking his dick are now making exactly the same comparison about Hillary and the Donald, but in reverse.

And that encapsulates the sad state of affairs represented by this election. The country WILL survive the election of either candidate, but it will not be pleasant.

And in 2020 2 more extreme shitbags will get up there and put on another dog and pony show.

 

[IrezumiKiss]

Um, no, the media distorts everything he says and takes a half sentence or two out of context, repeats it as a screaming headline, and idiots like you think its true.

Have you listened to any Trump speeches from beginning to end? If not, you know nothing and are just spouting crap the media and the DNC have pumped into your head.

Don't ya worry none, Renny ol' buddy. Ain't nothin' comes from worryin' except them pree-matchoor grey hairs in yer pubes.

Trump's gunna win in the end. An' he's a-gunna show this country a thing or two about a thing or two! Guhdammit!

Alla them patchoolie-scented hairy armpit college-edumacated femminist whoors and champayne-drinkin' queers and uppity negroes and trans...trans...trans...uuuhhh I don't know what the fuck they is, but them reversed sexual fuckers that's been changing the proper order of things laid down by his majesty The Lord Jeezus God 'round h'yar lately better watch out!

We're takin' this country back, m'man! It's gunna be like it was! Only more Americanier! Woooooo!

*fires shotgun multiple times into the upper stratosphere*

Hey, Renny...dawg-to-dawg...whatchoo doin' next Saturday? If yer not doin' nothin', figger you could come up to the city and we can have some beers or rounds of Jack and an authentic taco bowl made by Hispanics at Trump Tower Grill while we watch the game. My treat, buddy! I go there alla time, they know me!

https://img.washingtonpost.com/rf/image_480w/2010-2019/WashingtonPost/2016/05/05/National-Politics/Images/trump-taco-bowl1462484641.jpg?uuid=fKxZFBMKEeaptb9wOlpxkQ

I mean...I'm not invitin' ya tuh have dinner seated next to me because of any homo shit or shit like that...you know, I don't do that libuhrul queer shit like they do downtown and wherever...but...as a bro, bro! A couple o' bros doin' bro shit! Just puttin' it out there, bro! Lemme know, tho'!

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

I am not defending him, OK? But I do find it interesting how they can't seem to keep there incredible hatred for him at bay. They hate all Republicans, but this is different. This hate is without rival. They send their Brown Shirts to disrupt his rallies with shouts and sometimes violence. Not very classy. This guy looks like his head is about to explode like in the movie Scanners.

Early on, they used their normal bag of tricks, accusing him of a vast array of *phobias, racist (their favorite), stupid, ignorant and so on. But is didn't stick. In fact, it improved his popularity because he never backs down. The more they pore it on, the more he and his supporters dig in their heels. Libs are besides themselves with this guy.

Now don't think because I say this I am a 'Trumper'. I am independant and usually reserve my vote up until the last week before ballets go in. This is an observation.

But IMO, Libs and Dems should be more afraid of Clinton Inc. None of them will be left standing who does not voice support for her. Even Uncle Bernie is afraid of her, don't think he isn't. So he 'sold out' and supports her even though she represents everything he has been fighting against for thirty years. . He was tolerated just to make it look like Hillary was earning the nomination. But finally it was time to real him in.

I've been here for several Presidential cycles beginning with 2000. It doesn't matter who the candidate is for the Republicans, the Democrats focus all the hate they can summon upon that candidate. They are a party of pure emotion. One of our Founding Fathers recognized and acknowledged that is political campaigns emotion always overcomes reason, so they get themselves pretty wound up. Their candidate is always perfect and always without flaws, so there is no need to talk about them or any of the issues when the other guy wants women with coat-hangers in dark, dank back alleys, wants to keep minorities in poverty and servitude, wants to starve old people and deny them access to health care, they want to impoverish the elderly...,

Yada yada yada

 

[about_average]

Hard to chose between a turd burger and a shit sandwich.

Not hard at all, I'm choosing neither.

 

[BoyNextDoor]

Make sure to ignore everything Hillary has done in 30 years too otherwise BND will look like the partisan hack that he is!

Yes, democrats have an over the top white hot searing hatred of Drumpf.

You may now stick your tongue back up Clinton's ass.



It's true, democrats like BND among others would vote for a convict of every crime on the books if the DNC nominated them.

But Rethugz aren't better. Just look at what is going on in the GOP right now....LOL what a bunch of fucking morons.

No. There are three reasons to vote for the Democratic Party's nominee this cycle and they have nothing specifically to do with Hillary or blind adherence to a Party.

First, we were able to move the public policy agenda of the party is the direction that the country needs to continue to move in the direction of peace and prosperity. That was accomplished by the huge support that Bernie got within the party and the way he was able to leverage it for changes in the platform.

Second, The GOP nominee is a demagogue who has no plan, public policy foundation, foreign policy knowledge and is temperamentally unfit for the office. He simply cannot handle the pressure and represents a real danger to the country were he to become president. This cannot be over emphasized.

Third, the next president is going to nominate two and maybe three Justices to the SJC. The country simply cannot afford to have another Scalia or a Thomas on the court.

In the last two election cycles I voted Libertarian. I registered as a Democrat this cycle to vote for Bernie in the primaries. However I have been a dues paying Libertarian since 2009 (I am pretty sure, maybe 2008). In fact it pains me that I cannot in good conscience cast a vote for an incredible pair like Johnson/Weld for the Libertarian ticket.

In the final analysis, the risk is too great that this GOP demagogue slips into office. So, the best, mature and forward thinking and reasonable choice for the country in 2016 is to cast a Vote for Hillary Clinton. And it is a vote that can be cast with your head held high. She certainly is qualified, has the temperament and has the ability to get good people in positions of power. Plus, given a Democrat-controlled Senate and a powerful Bernie and Warren the Wall Street and Hawk-like Clinton tendencies will be mitigated.

That is all.

 

[Aglaopheme]

Well yes, they did a good job of hiding it while W was in office. Now FF 8 years.....

There is no party of Rove or Bush. Trump killed it. He defeated all 16 of their candidates, swallowed them all like a Big Mac.

Quite apropos. You talk too much

 

[RobDownSouth]

I've been here for several Presidential cycles beginning with 2000. It doesn't matter who the candidate is for the Republicans, the Democrats focus all the hate they can summon upon that candidate. They are a party of pure emotion. One of our Founding Fathers recognized and acknowledged that is political campaigns emotion always overcomes reason, so they get themselves pretty wound up. Their candidate is always perfect and always without flaws, so there is no need to talk about them or any of the issues when the other guy wants women with coat-hangers in dark, dank back alleys, wants to keep minorities in poverty and servitude, wants to starve old people and deny them access to health care, they want to impoverish the elderly...,

Yada yada yada

Such angst!

Disagreeing with the opposing party's platform does not constitute "hate", your pathetic attempt at re-framing notwithstanding.

The country as a whole is moving towards a more inclusive environment, where poor people do not suffer for the sake of your toxic ideological purity.

The age of white patriarchy draws to a close....2% few white voters each cycle from 2000 onwards. This trend continues unabated. You can no longer dictate your policy demands by sheer number of voters.

Your time is past, old man.

 

[Aglaopheme]

Even his own party members are calling him racist, stupid, and ignorant.

Not just him, but the whole party.

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/01/o...l?smprod=nytcore-ipad&smid=nytcore-ipad-share

Rather than run away from the anti-intellectual label, Republicans embraced it for their own political purposes. In his “time for choosing” speech, Ronald Reagan said that the issue in the 1964 election was “whether we believe in our capacity for self-government or whether we abandon the American Revolution and confess that a little intellectual elite in a far-distant Capitol can plan our lives for us better than we can plan them ourselves.” Richard M. Nixon appealed to the “silent majority” and the “hard hats,” while his vice president, Spiro T. Agnew, issued slashing attacks on an “effete core of impudent snobs who characterize themselves as intellectuals.”


William F. Buckley Jr. famously said, “I should sooner live in a society governed by the first 2,000 names in the Boston telephone directory than in a society governed by the 2,000 faculty members of Harvard University.” More recently, George W. Bush joked at a Yale commencement: “To those of you who received honors, awards and distinctions, I say, well done. And to the C students I say, you, too, can be president of the United States.”

Many Democrats took all this at face value and congratulated themselves for being smarter than the benighted Republicans. Here’s the thing, though: The Republican embrace of anti-intellectualism was, to a large extent, a put-on. At least until now.

 

[Not Normal]

Trump is not about interest group controlled money. He just turned down Koch brothers money. The media completely ignored that.

They can claim he's "in it for himself" which I think is ridiculous, this is costing him money and business deals, but you CANNOT honestly claim his a lackey of interest group money. He's just a guy who ran for President and struck a cord with a lot of people.

Actually the Koch brothers turned down Trump, not the other way around.

No. There are three reasons to vote for the Democratic Party's nominee this cycle and they have nothing specifically to do with Hillary or blind adherence to a Party.

First, we were able to move the public policy agenda of the party is the direction that the country needs to continue to move in the direction of peace and prosperity. That was accomplished by the huge support that Bernie got within the party and the way he was able to leverage it for changes in the platform.

Second, The GOP nominee is a demagogue who has no plan, public policy foundation, foreign policy knowledge and is temperamentally unfit for the office. He simply cannot handle the pressure and represents a real danger to the country were he to become president. This cannot be over emphasized.

Third, the next president is going to nominate two and maybe three Justices to the SJC. The country simply cannot afford to have another Scalia or a Thomas on the court.

In the last two election cycles I voted Libertarian. I registered as a Democrat this cycle to vote for Bernie in the primaries. However I have been a dues paying Libertarian since 2009 (I am pretty sure, maybe 2008). In fact it pains me that I cannot in good conscience cast a vote for an incredible pair like Johnson/Weld for the Libertarian ticket.

In the final analysis, the risk is too great that this GOP demagogue slips into office. So, the best, mature and forward thinking and reasonable choice for the country in 2016 is to cast a Vote for Hillary Clinton. And it is a vote that can be cast with your head held high. She certainly is qualified, has the temperament and has the ability to get good people in positions of power. Plus, given a Democrat-controlled Senate and a powerful Bernie and Warren the Wall Street and Hawk-like Clinton tendencies will be mitigated.

That is all.

Holy shit, actual logic on the GB. Good on you, Sir.

 

[Conager]

"Another Scalia?"

In case you haven't noticed the court is currently down one Scalia.

Why don't you just admit that you want to tilt the court heavily liberal for your own partisan reasons and quit pretending that you're somehow protecting jurisprudence.

 

[BotanyBoy]

First, we were able to move the public policy agenda of the party is the direction that the country needs to continue to move in the direction of peace and prosperity. That was accomplished by the huge support that Bernie got within the party and the way he was able to leverage it for changes in the platform.

I don't think more government micromanagement of peoples lives is the right direction. In fact I fucking hate the fact that I have to get a permit from the state to wipe my own ass and want it to go the other direction.

Second, The GOP nominee is a demagogue who has no plan, public policy foundation, foreign policy knowledge and is temperamentally unfit for the office. He simply cannot handle the pressure and represents a real danger to the country were he to become president. This cannot be over emphasized.

Vs Clinton bending me over so all her contributors can fuck me up the ass?

I'll take the guy without a plan.

Also I've heard from numerous sources that when the cameras are off Clinton is as rage prone as they get.

Besides we have checks and balances to keep POTUS from doing anything too crazy.

It's massively over emphasized.

Third, the next president is going to nominate two and maybe three Justices to the SJC. The country simply cannot afford to have another Scalia or a Thomas on the court.

Yes we can afford some balance. I don't like the idea of a SCOTUS filled with a bunch of activist judges forcing loony liberal bullshit down everyone's throats.

So, the best, mature and forward thinking and reasonable choice for the country in 2016 is to cast a Vote for Hillary Clinton. And it is a vote that can be cast with your head held high

Keep telling yourself that.

I'd be fucking ashamed to vote for that fucking piece of shit Clinton, so I'm not going to.

 

[Liar]

What would make all lemmings on both sides of the partisan piece of crap coin shit their wannabe britches is if both The Donald and Billary aren't around November 8...

...Trump stepping-down in disgrace first, then Clintonia indicted on multiple counts second.



Doesn't matter...

This is all about the USSA going down, anyway.

What would happen in that case? Would the veep picks duke it out?

The Battle Of Boring.

 

[Christobal]

Here is the front page of the Washington Post (web) as of 6:35 edt 8/27/16. I am just counting the headlines even if they are repeated throughout the single page.

Positive Hillary and DNC 1

Positive Donald and the GOP 0

Negative Hillary and DNC 1

Negative Donald and the GOP 17

https://www.washingtonpost.com/

edited to add link

 

[Conager]

Here is the front page of the Washington Post (web) as of 6:35 edt 8/27/16. I am just counting the headlines even if they are repeated throughout the single page.

Positive Hillary and DNC 1

Positive Donald and the GOP 0

Negative Hillary and DNC 1

Negative Donald and the GOP 17

That's only natural. How could anyone write anything positive about such a dark and hate-filled candidate.

The fact that they can't seem to find very much positive to write about Hillary is not because of any lack of fine, noteworthy accomplishments or the many obvious reasons to vote FOR her, that's only evidence that they are holding back in the interest of trying to be fair. Besides, everyone already knows that Hillary is the most qualified candidate in the history of candidates and therefore very little positive needs to be said about it.

#imwitHER, nuff said. Hillary has a vagina. Checkmate patriarchy.

 

[thør]

https://scontent.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/13879234_10154423638401934_3582667412341232871_n.jpg?oh=c4fda95dc1ddfe8e936c0da88889b859&oe=58181AAF

No idea if it's true, but wouldn't be a surprise.

 

[BotanyBoy]

No idea if it's true, but wouldn't be a surprise.

I've seen it on 2 separate and fairly reputable sites today....might be legit.

 

[Christobal]

https://scontent.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/13879234_10154423638401934_3582667412341232871_n.jpg?oh=c4fda95dc1ddfe8e936c0da88889b859&oe=58181AAF

No idea if it's true, but wouldn't be a surprise.

Read this article

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...p-top-table-main_dnc-ceo-220pm:homepage/story

"Thanks in part to the hard work of Amy, Luis, and Brad, the Democratic Party has adopted the most progressive platform in history, has put itself in financial position to win in November, and has begun the important work of investing in state party partnerships," Brazile said in a statement. "I’m so grateful for their commitment to this cause, and I wish them continued success in the next chapter of their career.”




No mention they did anything wrong just praise. I wonder why they resigned? Apparently they were doing a damn fine job.

 

[snugglestruggle]

I don't think more government micromanagement of peoples lives is the right direction. In fact I fucking hate the fact that I have to get a permit from the state to wipe my own ass and want it to go the other direction.



Vs Clinton bending me over so all her contributors can fuck me up the ass?

I'll take the guy without a plan.

Also I've heard from numerous sources that when the cameras are off Clinton is as rage prone as they get.

Besides we have checks and balances to keep POTUS from doing anything too crazy.

It's massively over emphasized.

Yes we can afford some balance. I don't like the idea of a SCOTUS filled with a bunch of activist judges forcing loony liberal bullshit down everyone's throats.

Keep telling yourself that.

I'd be fucking ashamed to vote for that fucking piece of shit Clinton, so I'm not going to.

Ignore reality and believe the talking points because

Trump = Boogeyman
http://vignette1.wikia.nocookie.net/creepypasta/images/e/e7/Boogey.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20120411203523

Clinton = Savior
http://www.polyvore.com/cgi/img-thing?.out=jpg&size=l&tid=25105130