Leave Lit Now, Righties! Republican Party Declares Pornography "Public Health Crisis"

"You vote for a party that considers this place a `public health crisis' - why are you here?" will be a fun question to repeat. Over, and over, and over, and over, and over, and over, and over, and over, and over, and over..........and over. ;)
 
"You vote for a party that considers this place a `public health crisis' - why are you here?" will be a fun question to repeat. Over, and over, and over, and over, and over, and over, and over, and over, and over, and over..........and over. ;)

conservative is a broad term.
do you really think all conservatives think alike?
you progressives are like ants.
marching 2x2

hoorah.
 
How about righties? Some right wingers may believe that the big government has no business in peoples bedrooms. Or that it is a multi-billion dollar industry and very capitalist. A denial of free speech.

I would think traditional conservatives would have more of an issue with internet porn. Family value types. Even if most here probably have kids.

There is some sick shit out there that even the most basic of searches will find. The rape based stuff we could do without.

How do they intend to censor the internet? Call in Chinese government experts? Create a US only web? USW?

Sounds like pandering to the electorate to me. And a small part of the electorate.
 
So, basically, every post of yours nowadays is a drown-esque straw man.

Have fun with that. :D

are you really frightened that
the big, bad republicans
are coming for your porn?

you know those G/god
damned evangelicals.

no sense of humor.
 
are you really frightened that
the big, bad republicans
are coming for your porn?

...

...you really aren't very bright, are you?

Sounds like pandering to the electorate to me. And a small part of the electorate.

Also, members of the party who openly admit there'll never be a wall, are going to officially back Trump's wall. Basically, they're all pooping in the pool, and not much will erase that sort of embarrassment.
 
Bill Clinton was right when he signed the Internet Decency Act to protect our kids from online porn. Sadly the bill was overturned by the courts but Bill was right. At least he cared about protecting kids. Unlike Obama, he wasn't all bad.
 
Bill Clinton was right when he signed the Internet Decency Act to protect our kids from online porn. Sadly the bill was overturned by the courts but Bill was right. At least he cared about protecting kids. Unlike Obama, he wasn't all bad.

:D

Three names, ruse:

1. Bill Clinton
2. Jerry Epstein
3. Lolita Express

Don't forget to call P. T. Barnum when you finish Googling.
 
Bill Clinton was right when he signed the Internet Decency Act to protect our kids from online porn. Sadly the bill was overturned by the courts but Bill was right. At least he cared about protecting kids. Unlike Obama, he wasn't all bad.

Good thing it was overturned...it isn't the governments job to protect your fuck trophy that's the parents job.

What are you some kinda fucking communist or some shit? :rolleyes:
 
How about righties? Some right wingers may believe that the big government has no business in peoples bedrooms. Or that it is a multi-billion dollar industry and very capitalist. A denial of free speech.

In a system that favors the dominance of two mega parties, everyone who want to vote for a side that matters get a fly or three in their soup.
 
Nothing new and this-along with any type of women's rights-is why the Repugs will never beat the Dems.

The women can vote and as for Porn? People love their porn, especially since its on the net and know one knows they watch it.

This is more of their 'family values' which is Repug talk for 'we want to enforce our 1950's and religious values on you'

They never learn
 
Typical Republican hypocrites. The thousands of gun deaths every year aren't a public health issue because guns don't kill, yet people whacking off in the privacy of their own home, not harming anyone else, is something we need to waste money on.

Talk about a bigger, more expensive, more intrusive government nanny state.
 
It's not harmless:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/a...-hopeless-bed-discover-porn-affect-BRAIN.html

https://www.researchgate.net/profil...ornography/links/0c960531cb31e0e710000000.pdf

Now, I don't care about what people do to themselves, although it does concern me somewhat at how easy it it for young children to access it, it even defeats filters as we found out the hard way. Now, if you want to examine the science of it, that is good. If the only thing you are interested in is the politics of the thing then with the assumptions made up above me, I have to assume that Democrats are very much interested in making sure children have access to porn...

Bye ya'll
 
Typical Republican hypocrites. The thousands of gun deaths every year aren't a public health issue because guns don't kill, yet people whacking off in the privacy of their own home, not harming anyone else, is something we need to waste money on.

Talk about a bigger, more expensive, more intrusive government nanny state.

Few people will pay attention to the planks and even fewer politicians will act on the planks. All it is is a mechanism by which the various minority factions can feel sated with the idea that someone listened to them.

The fact that ya'll want to take it serious just prove my point, the idiocy that both parties have to pander to.
 
Back
Top