Hey Lovecraft68 I call you out dude

No I don't really have a reason to be here, Other than it amuses me.
You've gotten to be so pathetic that you're here, guarding this place 24/7, while all I need to do is have a computer babysit you, and then come back at my leisure to poke the penguin. This doesn't even fucking compute with you. You're obsessed, not amused.

I don't even have to be here half the time to outlast you.
 
Nah, mine's average-ish and if being a dick is literal the dinosaurs were killed when he saw 1 million BC in his youth.
 
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/wo...ing-in-your-office-is-sexist.-True-story.html
I am freezing cold as I write this article at my desk. I’m wrapped up in a jumper with my legs crossed under me to keep warm, and my sleeves are pulled as far down as they go.
My two female colleagues are sitting opposite me wearing their jackets, and there’s a stack of emergency desk jumpers in case things get worse.

The men around us are all pretty much jacket-free. In fact, most of them have their shirt sleeves rolled up and religiously maintain that the temperature is ‘fine’.

Welcome to office life, where women battle daily with the air conditioning, and men have no idea there’s even a problem. They toil in their dream temperatures, while women are left to shiver. Or in my case, wrap themselves in a weird grey poncho/blanket/scarf.
isn't feminism great! Now air conditioning is sexist, too!
 
Bitch is insane. Lets hold that up next to the women who are beaten or killed every year for that same accusation. Neither is right and I'm not even sure what that has to do with feminism vs women being capable of insanity but sure. And according to the article she is medically sick. You can't blame her for that shit.
 
http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/helen-croydon/snoring-is-a-feminist-iss_b_6211250.html
Snoring Is a Feminist Issue

A friend recently told me how she too misses the quality restorative sleep she used to enjoy before she moved in with the boyf. The pair are blessed with a spare room but the few times she has used it, he complains that it ‘isn’t natural’ for young, fresh, loved-up couples to sleep apart.

It sounds to me like he may have confused what is ‘natural’ with what we have made into a societal norm. Did you know that humans are the only animal to sleep and have sex in the same place? (Does your dog ever look like he got a bad night’s sleep?) If my friend’s bloke is so concerned with what is ‘natural’ perhaps he should read about the benefits of sleeping according to one’s circadian rhythm. That is, falling asleep when you’re tired, not going to bed and waiting to fall asleep because any minute now your partner’s going to thud down beside you and wake you, just as soon as he’s done with that one last episode of CSI.

It is hardly surprising that men don’t appreciate the magnitude of REM interuptus. Multiple studies show that women sleep more lightly than men and find it harder to get back to sleep once woken. (Such as a paper by Austrian researchers called Sleep and Biological Rhythms and reported on by various media). Also, sixty per cent of men, compared to forty per cent of women over the age of 50 snore. Some men even think snoring is funny. Another ex in my collection used to play back the highlights from his ‘snoring app’ recording to his flat mate. They would roar with laughter at each crescendo.

The sleep-deprived need to get tougher. For starters, I demand a drop-down box on Internet dating profiles to forewarn whether a potential match is a snorer. We can specify non-smoker, why not non-snorer? We get a heads-up if a potential match is ‘athletic’ or have ‘a few extra pounds’ or if they are a ‘social drinker’ or ‘drink heavily’. But we will never know if a night in their boudoir will cost us our productivity the next day until we’ve had a test drive.
Yup, folks, snoring men is the new misogyny. Thanks, feminists!
 
http://i.imgur.com/vsYoD3T.jpg - and every abused man owes male feminists like you a kick to the nose for the way you enable abusive women.

Shit happens.

Bitch is insane. Lets hold that up next to the women who are beaten or killed every year for that same accusation. Neither is right and I'm not even sure what that has to do with feminism vs women being capable of insanity but sure. And according to the article she is medically sick. You can't blame her for that shit.

Shit happens. Women die because men can kill them with their bare hands. Is it right? I don't know. Governments are run by men with women thrown in every few years. Is it right? I don't know.

Why the fuck is this even a conversation? Life is unfair and people have to work harder than others, if you're going to whine about it, whine, but 'crying poor me' only gets you a 3rd of the way.

Life is unfair, get over it and attempt to overcome and if you can't .... start a rebellion. Seems silly now, but .... is it really that silly?

I wonder if Uncle Ruckus has any self awareness to realize there's no sunlight between himself and MellowGem.

There's only one person here who disagrees with this "shit happens" nonsense...
 
That. . .that doesn't even suggest anything negative about feminists but okay carry on.
 
That. . .that doesn't even suggest anything negative about feminists but okay carry on.
We all like to say feminism is like cancer. And at least one feminist out there confirms that.

Like I said, you people lack all sense of self awareness whatsoever.
 
Yes but it's just a blind insult and . . .I guess they confirmed it but whatever. I think you're just terribly confused.
 
Yes but it's just a blind insult and . . .I guess they confirmed it but whatever. I think you're just terribly confused.
Well hey, if feminists consider being likened to cancer as a badge of honor then that's on you, not us. :D

No wonder nobody fucking likes feminists.
 
And it's fine. There are much more important things in the universe than that.
 
Putting women back in their proper place is the cure for feminism. We know how to cure it and most of us don't want to.
 
Foolish is the man who tries to overpower gynocentrism and overthrow male disposability by use of force.

Wise is the man who learns to stealthily subvert and circumvent it.

The wise man does not use unprovoked violence or intimidation to free his fellow man from the oppression of expendability. These tactics are evil and forceful actions against which self-entitled women and their self-imagined valiant male defenders can resist with just cause.

Instead the wise man destabilizes the system by ceasing to perform his duty as an expendable load bearing mechanism. Simply refusing to participate in naturally assigned obligations to be women’s human shields, beasts of burden and punching bags, will bring the entire gynocentric culture crashing down.

The abomination that is coercion is both evil and counterproductive as a counterweight against the lopsided game of courtship. This is a violent act, first and foremost, and it is an aggression against which women, their male defender-slaves can resist and strike back against. The wise man avoids aggression and instead chooses to simply not participate in such an unfair system.

Women cannot defend against men refusing to serve. There can be no law passed to force men to participate in a system that treats them as expendable. There can be no female victims, no wounds inflicted upon their flesh, no new graves to dig, no crimes committed.

Feminists believe that men are not treated as the expendable gender, that there is no plantation. This is easily disproven the moment that the slaves - men - decide to walk off the plantation. The system - the one that depends on our sacrifices and blood, sweat and tears - will reveal its existence during its total collapse.

Look to Japan for inspiration. The Herbivore men have decided to stop participating in courtship and pursuing high-stress jobs. Japan was worried about its birthrate before; now they are in an absolute panic, going so far as to consider a “bachelor tax.” (A law which has failed to materialize.) Commonfolk women are even paying money to be coddled and romanced. Japanese Herbivore men did not respond to male disposability by going on a rage against women or the corporations that drove them to one of the world’s highest suicide rates; instead, they simply stopped participating. They pulled a load bearing mechanism out from under Japan and Japan has since gone from a birthrate and economic tailspin to a near terminal velocity nosedive.

Men can and only ever will destroy the system of male disposability with non-violent non-participation. Women and their desperate-for-approval man-slave defenders cannot attack men who simply are not there. The only thing they can hope and pray for is that enough other men continue to serve as load bearing mechanisms. That tactic isn’t working out for Japan.

Non-violence is the key to victory.

Feminists call this violence. The fact that they call this violence and oppression shows that feminists have an entitled mindset that makes them feel that men owe them something, that we must be enslaved to serve their interests. Slavery is violence. Entitlement is violence. Force is violence. We do not use force, they wish to use force.
 
Back
Top