California Will Now Require An Id And Background Check For Ammunition Purchases, But…

[Knot Again]

CALIFORNIA WILL NOW REQUIRE AN ID AND BACKGROUND CHECK FOR AMMUNITION PURCHASES, BUT…

(Wait for it!)

…Not to



VOTE

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Won't people just drive to another state, buy bulk and sell black market?

 

[Knot Again]

Capitalism is OUTLAWED in CA

or

People OBEY laws


take your pick, hic

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Be AFRAID! BE very afraid...,

http://media.townhall.com/townhall/reu/ha/2016/184/ab7ce12d-86b2-4102-9cb2-6386f7802d02.jpg

We're Coming for you!

 

[about_average]

CALIFORNIA WILL NOW REQUIRE AN ID AND BACKGROUND CHECK FOR AMMUNITION PURCHASES....

Except for the minor fact that they aren't.

Otherwise an accurate post, as usual.

 

[miles]

Except for the minor fact that they aren't.

Otherwise an accurate post, as usual.

Maybe not, but The Hildabeast does.

 

[about_average]

Maybe not, but The Hildabeast does.

Isn't it kinda early for you to be so drunk?

 

[NeverEndingMe]

I'm sure that if you dressed up as an obama isis terrorist that they would not ask for any identification. hell, I bet they won't even charge you sales tax

 

[snugglestruggle]

Be AFRAID! BE very afraid...,

http://media.townhall.com/townhall/reu/ha/2016/184/ab7ce12d-86b2-4102-9cb2-6386f7802d02.jpg

We're Coming for you!

Look! a gay rattlesnake.

 

[Knot Again]

Except for the minor fact that they aren't.

Otherwise an accurate post, as usual.

what exactly is the point of you outright LYING??????

http://www.latimes.com/politics/la-...x-gun-control-bills-1467394282-htmlstory.html

 

[miles]

Isn't it kinda early for you to be so drunk?

Ding!

 

[about_average]

what exactly is the point of you outright LYING??????

http://www.latimes.com/politics/la-...x-gun-control-bills-1467394282-htmlstory.html

See? There's your problem, you rarely post any evidence in your OP's.
http://www.latimes.com/local/politi...nd-checks-for-ammo-buyers-20140828-story.html
SB 53

Ding!

Wow, drunk early in the day two days in a row.

 

[phrodeau]

See? There's your problem, you rarely post any evidence in your OP's.
http://www.latimes.com/local/politi...nd-checks-for-ammo-buyers-20140828-story.html
SB 53


Wow, drunk early in the day two days in a row.

Your link was from 2014. But you're still technically correct, since the new law doesn't take effect until 2017.

Maybe by then they will require background checks to vote, and busybody will be happy.

 

[about_average]

Your link was from 2014. But you're still technically correct, since the new law doesn't take effect until 2017.

Maybe by then they will require background checks to vote, and busybody will be happy.

My bad. I googled "CA background check for ammunition purchases" and it was the first one that wasn't some extremist right wing site. And given BB's record of accuracy about things...

 

[Knot Again]

My bad. I googled "CA background check for ammunition purchases" and it was the first one that wasn't some extremist right wing site. And given BB's record of accuracy about things...

so as I said

WHY DO YOU LIE?

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

...

Gov. Jerry Brown signed onto much of the gun-control agenda advocated by legislative Democrats, who are clamoring to crack down in the wake of high-profile mass shootings including last year’s terrorist attack in San Bernardino.

The Democratic governor signed six bills Friday requiring gun owners to give up magazines holding more than 10 rounds and to undergo a background check before they can purchase ammunition, among other measures.

...

Brown’s action will require people who own magazines that hold more than 10 rounds to give them up. It extends a 1999 law that made it illegal to buy a high-capacity magazine or to bring one into the state but allowed people who already owned them to keep them.

In an attempt to slow gun users from rapidly reloading, the governor signed a bill outlawing new weapons that have a device known as a bullet button. Gun makers developed bullet buttons to get around California’s assault weapons ban, which prohibited new rifles with magazines that can be detached without the aid of tools. A bullet button allows a shooter to quickly dislodge the magazine using the tip of a bullet or other small tool.

People will be allowed to keep weapons they already own with bullet buttons, which are often referred to as “California compliant,” but they’ll be required to register them.
Brown also endorsed a bill requiring ammunition sellers to be licensed, buyers to undergo background checks and transactions to be recorded. It’s the Legislature’s second attempt to regulate ammunition sales after a judge struck down a 2009 law as too vague.

...

http://www.leadertelegram.com/News/...ia-s-tough-gun-laws-are-getting-stricter.html

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

That'll put an end to mass shootings...

 

[miles]

More stewpid, useless, feel good legislation.

Ask Chicagoans how their gun laws are working out.

 

[miles]

My bad. I googled "CA background check for ammunition purchases" and it was the first one that wasn't some extremist right wing site. And given BB's record of accuracy about things...

Ding!

 

[Knot Again]

from day 1, they are more intent with attacking me, then with realizing how absurd their side is

 

[miles]

Well, duh...that's nothing new. It's easy to do that, but it's impossible for them to intelligently defend their senseless opinions.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Was the article too old?



Does it take effect too far into the future?

 

[phrodeau]

My bad. I googled "CA background check for ammunition purchases" and it was the first one that wasn't some extremist right wing site. And given BB's record of accuracy about things...

How can that be? Isn't the liberal media all over this story, backslapping and toldyasoing, and holding up the new laws as an example to the nation?

Isn't that what the right-wingers told us to expect and fear? What could have happened? How can they be so wrong all the time?

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Post #16 dumbass...