Man jailed for 3 years in Egypt for saying that SOME wives are whores

I accept none of your tripe but you're going to have to try harder if you want me to give up on these simple fact.
1) actions have consequences including free speech.
2) Egypt is not a feminist paradise so it's safe to assume their actions were not done on behalf of women' s freedom or feminist or anything of the like.
 
Your boringly repetitive arguments have been debunked. You have no choice but to accept this.

I tell you what is, you don't tell me. Let's get that straight.

1) Freedom of speech never killed anyone.
2) Censorship never saved any women's lives.
3) Taymour el-Sobky's words never represented any threat to women.
4) Taymour el-Sobky's imprisonment was not about protecting women or saving lives. Sean Renaud acknowledged this when he talked about the plague of honor killings under the same regime.
5) Taymour el-Sobky would have been wise to come to America, where you are free to speak the facts about some of the wives in Egypt (which the people of Egypt would still have heard and gotten angry about but would be powerless to do shit about) - or even misguided opinions, for that matter - and you can't be thrown in jail.

That is the absolute truth.

See, someone who believed in equality would be cheering this. But thanks for reminding us who you really are.

No, I don't particularly care that they are arresting feminists. It's once again Egypt. Them making one tiny concession doesn't make them the good guys.

Wouldn't someone who believed in equality also care about the fact that they're arresting feminists? I guess Uncle Ruckus here showed us who he really is: a man who hates freedom and loves oppression.
 
You really are completely devoid of the ability to think. I'm so sorry that I challenged you and your small world view.
 
Your boringly repetitive arguments have been debunked. You have no choice but to accept this.

I tell you what is, you don't tell me. Let's get that straight.

1) Freedom of speech never killed anyone.
2) Censorship never saved any women's lives.
3) Taymour el-Sobky's words never represented any threat to women.
4) Taymour el-Sobky's imprisonment was not about protecting women or saving lives. Sean Renaud acknowledged this when he talked about the plague of honor killings under the same regime.
5) Taymour el-Sobky would have been wise to come to America, where you are free to speak the facts about some of the wives in Egypt (which the people of Egypt would still have heard and gotten angry about but would be powerless to do shit about) - or even misguided opinions, for that matter - and you can't be thrown in jail.

That is the absolute truth.

See, someone who believed in equality would be cheering this. But thanks for reminding us who you really are.

No, I don't particularly care that they are arresting feminists. It's once again Egypt. Them making one tiny concession doesn't make them the good guys.

Wouldn't someone who believed in equality also care about the fact that they're arresting feminists? I guess Uncle Ruckus here showed us who he really is: a man who hates freedom and loves oppression.
 
Those aliens that helped them build the pyrmaids must be shaking their heads at how far the Egyptians have fallen.....sad.
 
Blah blah can't think for himself.

And I've never been a fan of those alien theories. Atlantis maybe but aliens has always seemed like a complete crock of shit to me. And when I speak of Atlantis I mean a generic ancient civilzation that was a head of it's time and got wiped out somehow. It doesn't need to sink beneath the waves. A plague that wiped them out and nobody could recreate their tech would suffice.
 
You really are completely devoid of the ability to think. I'm so sorry that I challenged you and your small world view.
LOL at you implying that what you do is somehow called thinking.

No, what you do is bang your head on the keyboard and roll it around. No, wait, even if you did that you would be right more often than you are.
 
Again with the insults. Oh well.

I'm still wondering how it is you can pretend that nobody has ever been motivated to hurt anybody else via the spoken or written word.
 
Again with the insults. Oh well.
Good point. You insult yourself badly enough.

I'm still wondering how it is you can pretend that nobody has ever been motivated to hurt anybody else via the spoken or written word.
Because if they're motivated to hurt someone by that, they're already going to hurt someone.

Trying to stop that with censorship is part of why Egypt is a 3rd world hellhole. They think like you do, and thus they cannot evolve into modern times. Modern and enlightened nations have freedom of speech.
 
Bullshit. Trump rallies aren't filled with fucking orcs and we've seen lots of violence at them.

Ignoring that you don't know what 3rd world even means Egypt is a hell hole (to the extent that it is) because they are poor. Most nations do not actually have freedom of speech and they get along just fine for the most part.
 
Bullshit. Trump rallies aren't filled with fucking orcs
Actually yes they are. And feminists like you are just like Donald Trump, but for the opposite side.

Ignoring that you don't know what 3rd world even means
Of course I do. It is you who have no idea.

Egypt is a hell hole (to the extent that it is) because they are poor.
And because they are tragically oppressive, too. As long as Egypt throws men in jail for saying the truth, they will never stop being poor. Take that to the bank.

Most nations do not actually have freedom of speech and they get along just fine for the most part.
This shows you know nothing about the world. Nations without freedom of speech are at best 2nd world nations. There are zero first world nations that are anything near as restrictive as Egypt. Zero.
 
What then is a third world country? Because you are using it incorrectly.
LOL you just desperately want to get whupped AGAIN, don't you?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third_World
Over the last few decades since the fall of the Soviet Union and the end of the Cold War, the term Third World has been used interchangeably with the least developed countries, the Global South, and developing countries to describe poorer countries that have struggled to attain steady economic development, a term that often includes "Second World" countries like Laos. This usage, however, has become less preferred in recent years.[1]

Egypt falls in the category of the class of least developed countries with no economic development to speak of.

And they never will develop with their war on free speech.
 
Wow, you linked the wikipedia article that shows you were essentially using the word incorrectly. But I guess you were on that 'refudiate' train weren't ya.

Egypt's advancing has nothing at all to do with it's so called war on free speech anyway. But keep believing your nonsense.

Actually please carry on, I've never met anybody else so willing to learn that they'll go wikipedia things to prove my points. Given another few thousand posts I might make a man out of you.
 
Wow, you linked the wikipedia article that shows you were essentially using the word incorrectly. But I guess you were on that 'refudiate' train weren't ya.
This shows you have no ability to read.

the term Third World has been used interchangeably with the least developed countries
Did you miss that part, or did your reading aid helper take a lunch break?

Egypt's advancing has nothing at all to do with it's so called war on free speech anyway. But keep believing your nonsense.
Of course it is. Intellectual progress cannot thrive in countries like Egypt. But you'd understand that if you knew history. Which you don't. Because you're dimmer than a broke light bulb on the dark side of the moon.

Actually please carry on, I've never met anybody else so willing to learn that they'll go wikipedia things to prove my points. Given another few thousand posts I might make a man out of you.
All you have to do is stand next to someone to make them look manly. Or smart. Or sane.
 
And refudiate was used as well. The fact that a large amount of people incorrectly apply a term doesn't make you correct.

Intellectual progress is only so necessary for economic progress. That's just the reality of the situation.
 
And refudiate was used as well. The fact that a large amount of people incorrectly apply a term doesn't make you correct.
Words evolve. Bitch used to be a female dog. Now look at what it means.

Intellectual progress is only so necessary for economic progress. That's just the reality of the situation.
This is the truest sign that you will never know intellectual progress.
 
Female dog, it's also a generic insult. . .because you're saying they are a female dog. Not really evolution so much as an insult.

It's just a sign that I am capable of looking around the world and seeing what works and what doesn't work and what is tied together and what isn't. Freedom of speech is at best generally associated with "progress" but it clearly not the key ingredient.
 
Female dog, it's also a generic insult. . .because you're saying they are a female dog. Not really evolution so much as an insult.

It's just a sign that I am capable of looking around the world and seeing what works and what doesn't work and what is tied together and what isn't. Freedom of speech is at best generally associated with "progress" but it clearly not the key ingredient.
LOLOLOL you see and observe much in the same way that I menstruate.

Freedom of speech is THE key ingredient. It is literally the difference between being forced to drink hemlock and being free to write out the laws of gravity.

Why can't you just admit that you support oppression and oppose freedom? C'mon, you've said it in so many different ways already.
 
Men do menstruate you know?

Freedom of speech is not the key ingredient at all. You can keep claiming that all day but it doesn't change the facts that natural resources/money are much, much more important.

Freedom is ultimately a meaningless word.
 
Your boringly repetitive arguments have been debunked. You have no choice but to accept this.

I tell you what is, you don't tell me. Let's get that straight.

1) Freedom of speech never killed anyone.
2) Censorship never saved any women's lives.
3) Taymour el-Sobky's words never represented any threat to women.
4) Taymour el-Sobky's imprisonment was not about protecting women or saving lives. Sean Renaud acknowledged this when he talked about the plague of honor killings under the same regime.
5) Taymour el-Sobky would have been wise to come to America, where you are free to speak the facts about some of the wives in Egypt (which the people of Egypt would still have heard and gotten angry about but would be powerless to do shit about) - or even misguided opinions, for that matter - and you can't be thrown in jail.

That is the absolute truth.

See, someone who believed in equality would be cheering this. But thanks for reminding us who you really are.

No, I don't particularly care that they are arresting feminists. It's once again Egypt. Them making one tiny concession doesn't make them the good guys.

Wouldn't someone who believed in equality also care about the fact that they're arresting feminists? I guess Uncle Ruckus here showed us who he really is: a man who hates freedom and loves oppression.
 
Oh wow, we're back to this. Alright lets see if we can try something new.

Is is safe to be a whore in Egypt?
 
Freedom is ultimately a meaningless word.
Tell that bullshit to the feminists who got arrested in Egypt for being feminists, or the people who get arrested for "offending" Islam over there. Tell that to Socrates, Nat Turner, George Washington...

Damn, man, you really are living up to your title of Uncle Ruckus.
 
I'll say it to any man, woman, child, zygote, regular goat, or sentient meat Popsicle. If you have a wayback machine I'll tell all those other people too.
 
Back
Top