ExCuntclinton and the $12,000 coat

[Knot Again]

Did you think I was referring to you?

Speculation.

you were

fact!

 

[hashtag45]

It's good to know that non-Americans can be sexist pigs too.

I'm a sexist pig? Because I think that she dresses funny?
Look at any of the european first-ladies, they all look stylish and classy,which has nothing to do with age, looks or weight.

Just take those jalapenos sticks out of your ass and relax, will ypu?
Jesus!

 

[Knot Again]

paying 12K for this shit should disqualify her right away from ANYTHING

http://nypost.com/2016/06/05/hillarys-extravagant-campaign-wardrobe-costs-at-least-200k/


https://thenypost.files.wordpress.com/2016/06/hillary_clinton.jpg?quality=90&strip=all&w=300&strip=all

http://snn.bz/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/melania_trump.jpg

 

[sr71plt]

I'm a sexist pig? Because I think that she dresses funny?
Look at any of the european first-ladies, they all look stylish and classy,which has nothing to do with age, looks or weight.

Just take those jalapenos sticks out of your ass and relax, will ypu?
Jesus!

You're a sexist pig because you make an issue over what a female presidential candidate wears. You wouldn't (certainly haven't, that I see) done that with any male candidate for the position. Of course you don't see the difference--that's what being a sexist pig as all about. You even have extended the point by bringing up what European first ladies wear (but neither European male leaders or European "first men"). Congrats, you have a lot of company on this thread.

 

[hashtag45]

You're a sexist pig because you make an issue over what a female presidential candidate wears. You wouldn't (certainly haven't, that I see) done that with any male candidate for the position. Of course you don't see the difference--that's what being a sexist pig as all about. Congrats, you have a lot of company on this thread.

Have you swapped accounts with Ulaven Demorte?

You're ridiculous *pats head*

 

[chillywilly2]

did I say she cant?

all I said was it looks like SHIT, even for $12, let alone 12K

]

are you a trained fashion consultant or just self appointed?

 

[sr71plt]

Have you swapped accounts with Ulaven Demorte?

You're ridiculous *pats head*

Yeah, I think you lost that round too.

 

[Knot Again]

are you a trained fashion consultant or just self appointed?

it looks like SHIT...........on her

there is NO sane person who would say otherwise

 

[Knot Again]

You're a sexist pig because you make an issue over what a female presidential candidate wears. You wouldn't (certainly haven't, that I see) done that with any male candidate for the position. Of course you don't see the difference--that's what being a sexist pig as all about. You even have extended the point by bringing up what European first ladies wear (but neither European male leaders or European "first men"). Congrats, you have a lot of company on this thread.

you are absurd

 

[hashtag45]

You boyz only masturbate to pics. of beautiful, slim lingerie models who are half your age.

You never beat off to older, overweight or less pretty women.

So who are the sexist pigs here, huh, huh ?

 

[chillywilly2]

it looks like SHIT...........on her

there is NO sane person who would say otherwise

She just has to be careful to not get semen drips down the front, cause, you know, Bill likes that sort of thing

 

[Knot Again]

Even Algo wouldnt look good in that shit

 

[Darbhinder]

Again, what does that have to do with being president of the United States? I'm sure you're in a position to throw rocks at windows too. Of course backbiting is in style this season, so you're in style.

I take you've missed the part of her actually being a grandma. Are you a grandma? Do you look that good being a grandma?

Don't mind him, he always bashes women. Just look at the titties thread, if a female compliments another he calls them dykes and lesbians. He truly is one of the most vile pieces of shit here, and that's not mentioning his rape escapades he gloated about before editing his posts.

 

[nerfhearder]

I hate agreeing with racist scumbags but it really is hideous. The woman is a terrible dresser. Bill should help her out, he always looked sharp.

 

[hashtag45]

I hate agreeing with racist scumbags but it really is hideous. The woman is a terrible dresser. Bill should help her out, he always looked sharp.

It's good to know that non-Americans can be sexist pigs too.

See? (above post). Unlike yourself, sensible posters who don't get their panties in a twist over nonsense can tell the difference between
- making fun of someone's awful sense of style (the way I did)
- versus picking on people's physical characteristics and so on (the way that your progressive friends do).

You're a sexist pig because you make an issue over what a female presidential candidate wears. You wouldn't (certainly haven't, that I see) done that with any male candidate for the position. Of course you don't see the difference--that's what being a sexist pig as all about.

Why on Earth should I pay attention to what male candidates wear?
I can tell you a few jokes about Trump's hairstyle, but for the love of God, older men's fashion?

 

[miles]

The Hildabeast dresses like Chairman Mao.

 

[sr71plt]

See? (above post). Unlike yourself, sensible posters who don't get their panties in a twist over nonsense can tell the difference between
- making fun of someone's awful sense of style (the way I did)
- versus picking on people's physical characteristics and so on (the way that your progressive friends do).

Then you won't get your panties in a twist on being called out for being sexist, right? Just making fun of your knuckle dragging ways.

 

[hashtag45]

Then you won't get your panties in a twist on being called out for being sexist, right? Just making fun of your knuckle dragging ways.

I am sexist, but you got the gender (that I typically target aka progressive narcissists) wrong.
And good to see that you progressives are such classy douches then.

 

[Knot Again]

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Oh, get real...



We learned this with the Obamas. She is going to be the leader of the free world. Ostentation is how you prove how great you are. Her pant suits will rival The King's.

 

[Knot Again]

Hillary Denounces Income Inequality While Wearing $12,495 Jacket

Nothing sums up oligarchical collectivism like a greedy leftist demagogue denouncing income inequality white wearing a $12,495 jacket:

Hillary Clinton’s New York primary victory speech in April focused on topics including income inequality, job creation and helping people secure their retirement. It was a clear attempt to position herself as an everywoman.

But an everywoman she is not — she gave the speech in a $12,495 Giorgio Armani tweed jacket.

Hot Air puts the cost of the jacket into perspective:

The median family income in America is just around $51,000. The cost of her jacket represents 3 full months of income for a typical American household.

A minimum wage worker would have to work 43 weeks at 40 hours per week to pay for Hillary’s jacket.

The cost of feeding a family of four in America is $146 per week, for a low-cost meal plan, according to USA Today. Hillary’s jacket could feed a family of four in America for over a year and a half (85 weeks).

 

[miles]

Oh, get real...



We learned this with the Obamas. She is going to be the leader of the free world. Ostentation is how you prove how great you are.

Liberals are such funny creatures.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Will her jacket be serving too?

 

[Knot Again]

http://i0.wp.com/www.dcclothesline.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Hillary-Clinton-Talks-About-Inequality-In-Jacket-That-Cost-More-Than-A-New-Car.jpg?w=600


Hillary Clinton Talks About Inequality In Jacket That Cost More Than A New Car

 

[Christobal]

It's hard for me to relate to someone wearing a 12500 dollar coat. Who knows how much the pants, underwear and shoes cost.

My real problem is when any politician says I understand and relate to the lower income folks. Middle and lower income people find a $12500 coat ridiculous but yet the politicians can't even understand that. They are that out of touch.