Black Lives Matter morons and thugs storm the stage to silence conservative panelist

It fits the narrative. How do you think Benghazi lasted so long?

Because State and Clinton hid information and it took a hacker to reveal and as it only came out in dribbles and bits, the only problem that each new disclosure (which almost always came out late on a Friday) led to more questionable behavior and this recent State IG report was particularly damming. In short, it is lasting so long because Hillary has been lying from a script the whole time, rewriting her lies whenever caught and then telling the world, I INVESTIGATED ME AND I DID NOTHING WRONG!

If she had dumped everything and not tried to do a Rose Law Firm Billing Records cover-up, then the investigation would have been quick, complete and definitive, but every time investigators think they are finally getting to the bottom, they see a tiny door and a bottle labeled drink me and a cookie labeled eat me.
 
Again, thanks for telling me what I think, and what I am talking about.

The social media is pictures of racial slurs and death threats, sporto.
 
Now Pookie has me in a trap!

A damned page break and my short attention span!

I went from the TOPIC to Benghazi without ANY prompting...

;) ;) :kiss:
 
Again, thanks for telling me what I think, and what I am talking about.

The social media is pictures of racial slurs and death threats, sporto.

I'm not telling you what you think.

I am however telling you that without a completed investigation and finding of fact by the proper authorities then a picture is nothing more than a picture. A picture on social media and all of the commentary that I am sure is accompanying it is not news, not an investigation and not something that should be assumed as a priori fact and truth.

It could very well turn out to be true (or not) but at this point, you have no ground to cite it as proof of anything.
 
I'm not telling you what you think.

I am however telling you that without a completed investigation and finding of fact by the proper authorities then a picture is nothing more than a picture. A picture on social media and all of the commentary that I am sure is accompanying it is not news, not an investigation and not something that should be assumed as a priori fact and truth.

It could very well turn out to be true (or not) but at this point, you have no ground to cite it as proof of anything.

ROTFLMAO.

Because State and Clinton hid information and it took a hacker to reveal and as it only came out in dribbles and bits, the only problem that each new disclosure (which almost always came out late on a Friday) led to more questionable behavior and this recent State IG report was particularly damming. In short, it is lasting so long because Hillary has been lying from a script the whole time, rewriting her lies whenever caught and then telling the world, I INVESTIGATED ME AND I DID NOTHING WRONG!

If she had dumped everything and not tried to do a Rose Law Firm Billing Records cover-up, then the investigation would have been quick, complete and definitive, but every time investigators think they are finally getting to the bottom, they see a tiny door and a bottle labeled drink me and a cookie labeled eat me.
 
What was it like 17 investigations all clearing her name?

17 investigations THAT HAD EVIDENCE WITHHELD FROM THEM.

As I said just up above, if the evidence had been supplied in the first, or second investigations, then there would have been no ability to really go forward on any subsequent investigations and like this issue here, none of you have any idea as to what the FBI knows, but because everyone on you social media has listened to Hillary say that she did nothing wrong, then your bias is confirmed and you believe that what she says is completely truthful, that said she did nothing wrong. All you care about is that nothing was proved wrong based on her lies, mostly lies of omission.

And I think Pookie does a great service by giving us the opportunity to link the several stories under one progressive pattern of pragmatic behavior towards embryonic news.
 
I'm not telling you what you think.

I am however telling you that without a completed investigation and finding of fact by the proper authorities then a picture is nothing more than a picture. A picture on social media and all of the commentary that I am sure is accompanying it is not news, not an investigation and not something that should be assumed as a priori fact and truth.

It could very well turn out to be true (or not) but at this point, you have no ground to cite it as proof of anything.

Okie dokie.

Wait, the only problem is that is not what the pictures are. You're not very good at this. :eek:
 
The hate crime graph is bullshit.

Let's compare the number of airline passenger deaths between 1860 and 2017!

:rolleyes:
 
The hate crime graph is bullshit.

Let's compare the number of airline passenger deaths between 1860 and 2017!

:rolleyes:

Yeah, I mean, there's no way anti Muslim hate crimes could have spiked in the US in 2001. There is no obvious reason that could have happened. Amirite?
 
So, "hate crime" is a subjective metric which can only be proven if the white person says I did it because I hate minorities.

What happens when a black person claims that they assaulted their fellow student over his/her white privilege?

Is that reported as a hate crime?

The FBI is silent on that statistic...

;) ;) :kiss:
 
The hate crime graph is bullshit.

Let's compare the number of airline passenger deaths between 1860 and 2017!

:rolleyes:

Don't you see? The graph proves that this initial report is true in every sense of the word; investigations are not required to complete the course...
 
Guilt or innocence means nothing to them. An accusation of wrongdoing - even imagined ones - are the only excuse they need.
 
Back
Top