Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I looked and found no owners manual for how to write compelling mystery, so I gotta identify 6 or a dozen novels that depict it best of all, then tease out the formula from the prose. Its mystery that keeps the reader around.
The usual source for advice is Dorothy L Sayers introduction to the first volume of Great Short Stories of Detection, Mystery and Horror, published by Gollancz in 1930.
I suspect that "compelling mystery" might be different from one person to the next. To me, it is a story that keeps me guessing right up to the end. I don't really care for those stories that tell me whodunit at the beginning. I want an author who writes books that make me whine when I have to wait an entire year for the next one to be published. More popular authors are people like Agatha Christie, Erle Stanley Gardner, Dorothy Sayers, Sue Grafton, Ellery Queen etc. The internet has lots of lists of mystery authors. Good luck.
Raymond Chandler ridiculed Sayers.
And she probably retaliated, but her foreword is an essay on genres of detective fiction, not just her own work.
If you can find it, it's worth reading and is a standard text for UK students studying detective fiction. I lent my copy to a friend. She had to scan it and reprint it for the whole group.
Its not available on Kindle, and the hardcover copies cost a fortune.
Raymond Chandler ridiculed Sayers.
Chandler essentially ridiculed crime writers who didn't write like he did - and he had a point, because a helluva lot have tried to copy him.
Sayers deserved the criticism she got, I suspect that Chandler realized she had talent but she was a fearsome social and intellectual snob and allowed her own inadequacy of character to produce inferior work.
He was no-where near as hard on Agatha Christie, who had far less ability than Sayers, but at least her repetitive crap was her at her best.
PD James was a far better female British crime writer than either Sayers or Christie, but probably too English to appeal to a wider audience.
Chandler essentially ridiculed crime writers who didn't write like he did - and he had a point, because a helluva lot have tried to copy him.
Sayers deserved the criticism she got, I suspect that Chandler realized she had talent but she was a fearsome social and intellectual snob and allowed her own inadequacy of character to produce inferior work.
He was no-where near as hard on Agatha Christie, who had far less ability than Sayers, but at least her repetitive crap was her at her best.
PD James was a far better female British crime writer than either Sayers or Christie, but probably too English to appeal to a wider audience.
I looked and found no owners manual for how to write compelling mystery, so I gotta identify 6 or a dozen novels that depict it best of all, then tease out the formula from the prose. Its mystery that keeps the reader around.
Really, I mean REALLY, from the benefit of some distance in history, Sayers and Chandler are TOTALLY different writing styles - even though you might think they have similarities when it comes to detective yarn plotting or exposition and all of this.
I think it's a mistake to view 'detective fiction' or 'thriller fiction' as specifically about the plotting and the structures within novels. Sayers was ALL about the 'massage' and not the message; Chandler WAS the message as long that is, as it was blunt one.
For me there is a lot of interesting and well-known 'mystery' fiction, especially all of the original gothic 'purple prose' stuff, that virtually always completely fucks up any kind of rational ending. Everyone dies horribly, or the story goes completely off the rails altogether and you can't even work out who you're actually reading about! I mean whatsisname - Truman Capote - is the worst! He is such a fucking amazing good writer, bu-u-u-u-t, his books are too long because of some stupid publishing theory about how long a book ought to be.
Pacing too, is so different from writer to writer: why I like Maclean is pacing, why I like James Hadley Chase is pacing, why I like Deighton is pacing, why I like Mickey Spillane is pacing - and their pacing and sense of it is all completely different.
A mystery is compelling because...? ??
A MYSTERY IS COMPELLING BECAUSE:
of -
atmosphere,
people and personalities,
and the spider's web...
But what exactly IS that spider's web?
Ah but mystery DOES need to be compelling. That's a very special word that, 'compelling.' You MUST. You MUST go on, you MUST see behind that door, MUST.
I love Woody Harrelson in these types of stories; he is SO the protagonist - needy, defective, nice guy, desperate, stupid, clever, struggling to be intelligent and nearly gets there or even gets there, meritable, worthy but disfavoured, honest... ...the whole idea is that no one believes in their own 'happily ever after' and so Woody ain't gonna get one either.
But these are not the mystery stories that I would write. I wouldn't feel honest trying to write that stuff.
The only mystery to him was what was Jimmy Johnson doing on that same ward floor? Jimmy Johnson, the only kid at school and then later in the navy, who could whup his ass in a head-to-head fight...
Now that's a piece of fan fiction I didn't expect to see!
You should continue this.
Have you ever read the works of Simon Kernick? That's my favorite author.
NOIRTRASH contributes so much to this site - as do a few others, of course. But he's entitled to a bit of FF.