Transgendereism



Poll: 6-in-10 oppose bills like the North Carolina transgender bathroom law




http://www.cnn.com/2016/05/09/politics/poll-transgender-bathroom-law-north-carolina/

If you're going to pick a poll, at least pick one germane to the issue. NO ONE is discussing the NC law here but you. Further, polls considering allowing men to use women's bathrooms, and vice versa, show a completely different picture, especially with regards to the public schools.

Further the poll is bogus in that very few, including you, have actually read the law. And any response made in that regard is made out of ignorance.

The poll has nothing to do with the discussion.

Ishmael
 
If you're going to pick a poll, at least pick one germane to the issue. NO ONE is discussing the NC law here but you. Further, polls considering allowing men to use women's bathrooms, and vice versa, show a completely different picture, especially with regards to the public schools.

Further the poll is bogus in that very few, including you, have actually read the law. And any response made in that regard is made out of ignorance.

The poll has nothing to do with the discussion.

Ishmael

Neither does the law, but that didn't stop you from starting a thread about it. The law in NC won't do a darn thing.
 
Trans people have been using the bathroom for years. This wasn't a problem until 2 months ago.

Exactly. Election year politics. But at least in our transient social crisis atmosphere black lives no longer matter and no one wants to occupy Wall St. anymore.

It's like watching a circus parade with the crowd taking it seriously.

Watch carefully, this is going to become a part of the criminals campaign.

Ishmael
 
Last edited:
Exactly. Election year politics. But at least in our transient social crisis atmosphere black lives no longer matter and no one wants to occupy Wall St. anymore.

It's like watching a circus parade with the crowd taking it seriously.

Watch carefully, this is going to become a part of the criminals campaign.

Ishmael

This is an issue that was created by the Republicans. They've already adopted it as their issue.
 
Really? Explain how, in detail.

Ishmael

100% of the trans gender bathroom laws were created and signed into law by Republicans. Keeping in mind, this wasn't an issue until they drafted and adopted that legislation.
 
SpiderMa'am can vouch for it, Mexicans are nasty mofos and need to be tossed outta public restrooms, too.
 
Hey JBJ

This shows that NZ politicuans aren't too bad after all:
They show genuine concern both for the issues faced by this particular minority group and for other people's reluctance to "revolutionize the toilet culture".
And they don't need use minorities to further their political agenda or make a political circus out of it either.



Unisex bathroom for transgender Auckland primary pupil
www.newshub.co.nz/nznews/unisex-bat...ckland-primary-pupil-2016051513#axzz48hpiBo9q

"Rainbow Youth is applauding an Auckland primary school's decision to install a unisex bathroom for a transgender pupil.

"I think that would help a lot of people who use gendered bathrooms as a safety argument, but it would also help those who wouldn't feel comfortable."
"When we look at the practicalities of changing all bathrooms it's potentially a good middle ground providing facilities for people who need it in a more cost-effective manner."

"The Herald on Sunday has chosen not to name the school to protect the child's privacy.
Earlier this year, two Wellington secondary schools decided to fit gender-neutral bathrooms for students who felt uncomfortable using "male" or "female" bathrooms."
 
Last edited:
You're wasting your time hashrag.

If you were half the detective and GB colour commentator you aspire to be, you would know JBJ cares little for transgender folk and effeminate men.

He prefers rugged, athletic, masculine fellas. Think the complete opposite of you.

If you only took some time away from your incessant and irrelevant posting and actually spent time reading Lit, you would know ol' Jimmy as the rest of us do.


From his 'Septuagenarian & Gay in FLA' profile:


attachment.php


"when I finish with you, youll prolly need a mobility scooter too."
http://41.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m2ykwqHd6D1qe9rsqo1_500.jpg
 
Your cock is too small, Emerson. His isn't.
 
Last edited:
I clearly hit the nerve lol
He never used the "third world" "insult" before.

Futile exercise. People already saw it & they already know that you have a tiny penis.
 
Last edited:
Hey JBJ

This shows that NZ politicuans aren't too bad after all:
They show genuine concern both for the issues faced by this particular minority group and for other people's reluctance to "revolutionize the toilet culture".
And they don't need use minorities to further their political agenda or make a political circus out of it either.



Unisex bathroom for transgender Auckland primary pupil
www.newshub.co.nz/nznews/unisex-bat...ckland-primary-pupil-2016051513#axzz48hpiBo9q

"Rainbow Youth is applauding an Auckland primary school's decision to install a unisex bathroom for a transgender pupil.

"I think that would help a lot of people who use gendered bathrooms as a safety argument, but it would also help those who wouldn't feel comfortable."
"When we look at the practicalities of changing all bathrooms it's potentially a good middle ground providing facilities for people who need it in a more cost-effective manner."

"The Herald on Sunday has chosen not to name the school to protect the child's privacy.
Earlier this year, two Wellington secondary schools decided to fit gender-neutral bathrooms for students who felt uncomfortable using "male" or "female" bathrooms."

The toilet drama is how politicians distract us from what matters most. The world is poised at the abyss of economic ruin, and the pols obsess about tranny comfort. Ethical leaders ignore the drama and fret about employment, prosperity, public and private safety, health, and the other pragmatic issues.

I suggest portable toilets painted pink and blue. Put them in the space between the traditional restrooms.
 
The toilet drama is how politicians distract us from what matters most. ]The world is poised at the abyss of economic ruin, and the pols obsess about GID comfort. Ethical leaders ignore the drama and fret about employment, prosperity, public and private safety, health, and the other pragmatic issues.
So true.

And they're unethical in other ways too.
Because, your "liberal" politicians are in fact perpetuating and magnifying the problem (discrimination of people with GID) that they're pretending to fight against.

Because, for example , some women get fed up with the political circus and intrusion on Their personal space (by allowing poorly screened access of men into their toilets) so they react by becoming fed up with people with GID.
It's an emotional response not a rational one, because politicians started the circus/not people with GID --- but anyone can understand some of the public backlash.


Look what happened in Germany. They tried to keep hidden from the public those awful cases of sexual assault and so on, while engaging in an over-the top kumbaya campaign.
So who did germans elect now (after welcoming muslim reffugees with open arms, only a year ago)? A right-wing political party.
 
Last edited:
Neither political party (be they R or L, -and I'm not referring just to the States- ) care about minorities, really.
It's obvious from the fact that they only pursue things that further their political agenda. As opposed to things that would really make a difference, yet are less visible to the public or don't help them politically.
 
Evidence suggests that people who identify with a gender different from the one they were assigned at birth, may do so not just due to psychological or behavioral causes, but also biological ones related to their genetics, the makeup of their brains, or prenatal exposure to hormones.[1]


Biological causes

Genetic variation, hormones, and differences in brain functioning and brain structures provide evidence for the biological etiology of the symptoms associated with GID. Twin studies indicate that GID is 62% heritable, evidencing the genetic influence or prenatal development as its origin.[22] In transsexual people who were assigned male at birth, GID is associated with variations in an individual's genes that make the individual less sensitive to androgens.[1] Zhou et al. (1995), in a study of six individuals, found that in one area of the brain, transsexual people who were assigned male at birth have a typically female structure, and transsexual people who were assigned female at birth have a typically male structure.[23] In addition, some aspects of trans women's hypothalamus functioning resemble that typical of cisgender women.[24]

this ^^
 
I'm not sure that you understood what we were referring to butters, because you're completely off topic.

And everybody knows what GID (or how they name it now) entails, or otherwise they could simply google it.
 
Last edited:
^drosophila

a reference to the characteristic of lingering around overripe or rotting fruit. keep sucking up to your buds, li'l fly.
 
Back
Top