Litiquette IV

Which of the following is the most likely reason you post in a thread

  • Thread title

    Votes: 36 14.5%
  • Thread topic

    Votes: 141 56.9%
  • Who recently posted

    Votes: 22 8.9%
  • What was recently posted

    Votes: 44 17.7%
  • Who the OP is

    Votes: 5 2.0%

  • Total voters
    248
Status
Not open for further replies.
I just raced my boyfriend down the hallway of our apartment building and lost -- winner gets a blow job. Stunned, I challenged him to a rematch and lost again. Now I owe two blow jobs. Not sure how this applies to the original question but I have a hunch it's tangentially related.
Trekka, I don't think gambling is for you, dear....
 
Is the thrill of winning greater than the despair of losing?

In a mathematical sense, if you could assign a numerical value to both, positive for winning and negative for losing, would the sum of the two be equal to zero? Or is winning so much better than losing that the sum is positive. Or does losing suck so much that the sum is negative?

And then to go even deeper, if the sum is negative should the game even be played if allowing for "the greater good?"

I like to win.

I think an endeavor isn't worth it if some measure of success cannot be gleaned from it.
That being said, success does not always mean a win.
Sometimes, it means a loss with lessons learned and a valid idea of present situations.

Now, if it's a loss with nothing learned.....that sucks.
 
I was a somewhat professional athlete up until last year. So, I would evaluate my performances after. Think about what went wrong. And how I can get better.

WWF (World Wanking Federation) is not a recognized/sanctioned sports organization.

Amateur.

Here's an AIDS dick for you.

Dear Lord Pmann,

Please accept my heartfelt apology for calling you an amateur wanker. Everyone here knows (or should know) that you are, indeed, a professional. And you're really, really good at it from what I've heard from your rabid and rather sizable fan base. So, I sincerely apologize if I besmirched your good name in the professional wanking world.

Go for Gold in 2016!

Sincerely,
A Big Fan of Wanking
 
Dear Lord Pmann,

Please accept my heartfelt apology for calling you an amateur wanker. Everyone here knows (or should know) that you are, indeed, a professional. And you're really, really good at it from what I've heard from your rabid and rather sizable fan base. So, I sincerely apologize if I besmirched your good name in the professional wanking world.

Go for Gold in 2016!

Sincerely,
A Big Fan of Wanking

He's so good at it, he does it without hands.


And without a cock.
 
Quick hitter this morning:

Do you believe in change for change sake? Because if the change is made isn't there really an underlying reason?
 
Quick hitter this morning:

Do you believe in change for change sake? Because if the change is made isn't there really an underlying reason?
I work for a large, multinational company. At some point, someone at the HO decided that "change" was a good idea. After working in my particular field for 25 yrs, I have seen so many things come and go. So when we "change" things, I am skeptical. And when it doesn't work as planned, I'm always ready with an "ITYS" :D Some call me a smart ass; I call it experienced
 
Quick hitter this morning:

Do you believe in change for change sake? Because if the change is made isn't there really an underlying reason?

I believe there is always an underlying reason. In my opinion, the reason change often fails on first attempt is because the reason was not clearly communicated and so it's difficult to generate engagement.
For the most part, I'm a fan of change. I like indoor plumbing. I hate mixing medications in glass vials. I like to fly across the country in 7 hours. Change is good.
 
Change should only exist if necessary or the potential for betterment is there.

For the most part, anyway. I like efficiency.
 
Quick hitter this morning:

Do you believe in change for change sake? Because if the change is made isn't there really an underlying reason?

Creature of habit here, no need to change just to change, willing to change for valid reason though.
 
I like change. Quarters are my favorite. They're so versatile. You can use them in drinking games, laundromats, toll booths, to pitch at hookers....

The list of their effective uses is nearly endless.
 
I like change. Quarters are my favorite. They're so versatile. You can use them in drinking games, laundromats, toll booths, to pitch at hookers....

The list of their effective uses is nearly endless.

How do you feel about those gold dollar coins?
 
Now I have the tiny toons theme song stuck in my head. Thanks a lot, ladies.
 
Quick hitter this morning:

Do you believe in change for change sake? Because if the change is made isn't there really an underlying reason?

Quick answer:
I only change things if necessary. Like if something no longer works or something more efficient comes along.....kinda.
 
Again, depends on the change. I am looking around for a new couch. I don't need it, I just want a change. Is that a reason or just change for change sake?

Stick your hands between the cushions and you should find all the change you need.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top