Drumpf and his brownshirts

talis13

Virgin
Joined
Jul 8, 2014
Posts
21
Drumpf made a cold, calculated move to violence.
And of course as soon as he succeeded in getting the protestors to retaliate, he denounces them for attacking first (as opposed to the truth - self-defense) and proclaims they hate free
speech. And the whole K0CH Taliban Party has been setting us up for decades.
Pulling the Nazi card can be over the top but I do not think that is so when
talking about Trump and the Reich Wing.
Maddow at her best.
http://crooksandliars.com/2016/03/maddow-trump-violence-deliberate-heres
This link is where you start:
http://on.msnbc.com/1TC0HNu
You can watch the rest of the sequence manually from the bar under the video I linked to or just let it autoplay. It will go through the whole sequence.

I'll bet dollars to doughnuts Luntz,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frank_Luntz, the psychopathic but brilliant
messaging guru is orchestrating it. The Goebbels of Trump's campaign.

http://crooksandliars.com/2016/03/violence-begets-violence-just-way-they-it
 
Good to see the lefties doing the exact same shit the righties did when Obama was gunning for the WH. ;)
 
Good to see the lefties doing the exact same shit the righties did when Obama was gunning for the WH. ;)

I'm pretty sure the righties didn't finger Obama as a congenital liar fascist. They used other approaches, I think. And Obama didn't do anything to feed any of their shit, like Trump is blatantly doing to feed the stuff on him.
 
I'm pretty sure the righties didn't finger Obama as a congenital liar fascist. They used other approaches, I think. And Obama didn't do anything to feed any of their shit, like Trump is blatantly doing to feed the stuff on him.

You're right they used congenital liar socialist.

Then they compared him to Hitler as much as they could.

The left is not in the vicinity of the flat earth righties.

Yea but they still made the Hitler comparisons as their argument against the guy.
 
You're right they used congenital liar socialist.

Then they compared him to Hitler as much as they could.



Yea but they still made the Hitler comparisons as their argument against the guy.

Please link me to any Dem leader who used the Hitler attack.

And then tell me who is a socialist in the Dem leadership.

I cannot wait.
 
Please link me to any Dem leader who used the Hitler attack.

And then tell me who is a socialist in the Dem leadership.

I cannot wait.

Why? I never said Deam leaders were the ones doing it, that's just you running around with your goal post.

Every single one of them along with most of the Republicans. There are VERY FEW if any in our political leadership at large that aren't socialist of one shade or another.
 
Last edited:
Why? I never said Deam leaders were the ones doing it, that's just you running around with your goal post.

Every single one of them along with most of the Republicans. There are VERY FEW if any in our political leadership at large that aren't socialist of one shade or another.

It hurts Bernie, tho.
 
Please link me to any Dem leader who used the Hitler attack.

And then tell me who is a socialist in the Dem leadership.

I cannot wait.

You have Rachel Mad Dog with her Brownshirt reference in the OP. That's another way of making the Nazi or Hitler attack.

Bernie is a member of the Socialist Party and makes no secret of it. :eek:
 
You have Rachel Mad Dog with her Brownshirt reference in the OP. That's another way of making the Nazi or Hitler attack.

Bernie is a member of the Socialist Party and makes no secret of it. :eek:

Oh shoot, the Socialists are having a party and didn't invite me! Will there be wife swapping?
 
Donald Trump threatens to send supporters to disrupt Bernie Sanders’ events

On Sunday, Trump signaled to his legion of followers that it might be time to express their anger by becoming “disruptors” at Sanders’ events.

“Bernie Sanders is lying when he says his disruptors aren’t told to go to my events,” Trump wrote on Twitter. “Be careful Bernie, or my supporters will go to yours!”

"Send in the Clowns", could be their theme song.
 
Bernie is a member of the Socialist Party and makes no secret of it. :eek:

OMG NOT THAT!!!

LOL

I don't understand why that word makes socialist semi-light (republicans/ 'conservatives') run around like chickens with their heads cut off.......

Why does that word freak you out so bad box? You fucking love socialism.
 
OMG NOT THAT!!!

LOL

I don't understand why that word makes socialist semi-light (republicans/ 'conservatives') run around like chickens with their heads cut off.......

Why does that word freak you out so bad box? You fucking love socialism.

All I did here was answer a question somebody asked.
 
All I did here was answer a question somebody asked.

That doesn't change the fact that you (and a number of others who are pretending they don't like socialism) point out that Sanders is a

SOCIALIST!! :eek::eek:

Every chance they get as if it's coodies or some shit.

Why? :confused:

I'm trying to understand the irrational fear of socialism. I say irrational because y'all (generally speaking) only seem to dislike socialism when it comes to taking care of American people or improving America in some way.

Healthcare....education....infrastructure....VA....green energy all scathing hatred of the evil socialism.

Coal energy, corn/soy/beef farming, big banks, defense/military, police/prison industry.....all that socialism is A-OK in fact is so OK it's magically made capitalist because that's how delusionally happy the conservative Republicans are with it. We can tax and dump as much money as we want into that and you wouldn't hear a single fuckin' peep out of the RW about it.

I mean fuck most righties think the commercial COMMERCIAL legalization of pot = socialism.

Equal treatment under the law? Socialism.

Abortion? Socialism.

Premarital sex? Socialism!

It's like you guys just use that word to describe "shit we don't like" and don't have a fucking clue what the word actually means.

Why is that?
 
Last edited:
Recent Events resurrects the ghost of "Dick" Nixon!

1968: How Donald Trump channels the spirit of one of America’s most violent years

Forty-eight years ago the USA was torn by assassinations, mayhem and Democratic war mongering. Troops were in the streets, police on the picket lines, Southern Governors were calling for States Rights and the President decided to not be a further divider.

From this chaotic mess a man emerged that called for Order and said he could heal to wounds that plagued America.

Younger voters were probably the most shocked by the violent televised scenes at Donald Trump’s canceled Chicago rally on Friday – and the photographs of a bloodied demonstrator which speckled the web. But older Americans know that our politics have never been more than a temporary stranger to violence, since the very beginning of the republic.

For those with long political memories, Chicago was already famous as the scene of some of the most influential political violence of the last 50 years. As Theodore H White wrote in his Making of the President series : “In 1968 the name Chicago won a significance far beyond date and place. It became the title of an episode, like Waterloo, or Versailles, or Munich.”

When the Democrats held their convention in Chicago in August of that year, at the height of the Vietnam war, at least 10,000 anti-war demonstrators clashed with more than 20,000 policemen, national guardsmen and regular soldiers in the streets of Chicago.
 
That doesn't change the fact that you (and a number of others who are pretending they don't like socialism) point out that Sanders is a

SOCIALIST!! :eek::eek:

Every chance they get as if it's coodies or some shit.

Why? :confused:

I'm trying to understand the irrational fear of socialism. I say irrational because y'all (generally speaking) only seem to dislike socialism when it comes to taking care of American people or improving America in some way.

Healthcare....education....infrastructure....VA....green energy all scathing hatred of the evil socialism.

Coal energy, corn/soy/beef farming, big banks, defense/military, police/prison industry.....all that socialism is A-OK in fact is so OK it's magically made capitalist because that's how delusionally happy the conservative Republicans are with it. We can tax and dump as much money as we want into that and you wouldn't hear a single fuckin' peep out of the RW about it.

I mean fuck most righties think the commercial COMMERCIAL legalization of pot = socialism.

Equal treatment under the law? Socialism.

Abortion? Socialism.

Premarital sex? Socialism!

It's like you guys just use that word to describe "shit we don't like" and don't have a fucking clue what the word actually means.

Why is that?

First, what are coodies? :confused:

Second, I favor full legalization of MJ and consider it to be essentially harmless. I don't recommend people use it, but the trivial harm it sometimes does is not worth the harm done by enforcing laws against it. Think of the Prohibition era.

Third, I'm not sure what you mean by equal treatment under the law. As a white, middle class male, I think it would be highly beneficial to me, so I am in favor of it.

Fourth, I believe in abortion on demand and non-marital sex. I even write glowingly of the latter. I don't like abortion but I believe sometimes it is the least bad solution to a problem.

What I don't like about Socialism as an economic system is that it stifles initiative and ambition. If I am a worker bee in an office, I could incur expenses and spend time and effort on furthering my education and becoming an accountant or administrator. Under Socialism, why bother? :( I would end up making almost the same amount of money and the difference would not be worth all the trouble. This is something of a welfare attitude, which attitude is something Socialism encourages. :eek:

As for what is sometimes called "corporate welfare," I don't like that very much either, unless there is some genuine national benefit.
 
First, what are coodies? :confused:

Second, I favor full legalization of MJ and consider it to be essentially harmless. I don't recommend people use it, but the trivial harm it sometimes does is not worth the harm done by enforcing laws against it. Think of the Prohibition era.

Third, I'm not sure what you mean by equal treatment under the law. As a white, middle class male, I think it would be highly beneficial to me, so I am in favor of it.

Fourth, I believe in abortion on demand and non-marital sex. I even write glowingly of the latter. I don't like abortion but I believe sometimes it is the least bad solution to a problem.

What I don't like about Socialism as an economic system is that it stifles initiative and ambition. If I am a worker bee in an office, I could incur expenses and spend time and effort on furthering my education and becoming an accountant or administrator. Under Socialism, why bother? :( I would end up making almost the same amount of money and the difference would not be worth all the trouble. This is something of a welfare attitude, which attitude is something Socialism encourages. :eek:

As for what is sometimes called "corporate welfare," I don't like that very much either, unless there is some genuine national benefit.

Cooties are worse than crabs and bigger than lobsters. Their claws hang below a girls hem, and are impossible to conceal. No sane man ever puts his hand tween her legs.
 
First, what are coodies? :confused:

JBJ got it right.

Second, I favor full legalization of MJ and consider it to be essentially harmless. I don't recommend people use it, but the trivial harm it sometimes does is not worth the harm done by enforcing laws against it. Think of the Prohibition era.

Third, I'm not sure what you mean by equal treatment under the law. As a white, middle class male, I think it would be highly beneficial to me, so I am in favor of it.

Fourth, I believe in abortion on demand and non-marital sex. I even write glowingly of the latter. I don't like abortion but I believe sometimes it is the least bad solution to a problem.

I know...but you're a Cali Republican, in TX saying any of that shit would get your pinko commie ass drug down a Jasper gravel road.

Most of the GOP thinks all that stuff is pure socialism. Just ask Ted Cruz.

What I don't like about Socialism as an economic system is that it stifles initiative and ambition.

NASA would beg to differ.... so would West Point.....

The idea that socialism stifles initiative and ambition is demonstrably false.

If I am a worker bee in an office, I could incur expenses and spend time and effort on furthering my education and becoming an accountant or administrator. Under Socialism, why bother? :( I would end up making almost the same amount of money and the difference would not be worth all the trouble. This is something of a welfare attitude, which attitude is something Socialism encourages. :eek:

If you were speaking of old soviet communism I would agree but no one is proposing we do that.

Things like UHC and real PUBLIC education simply would not do that any more than NASA has....or Lockheed Martin for that matter. In fact all the evidence shows they work better and are CHEAPER!!

But oh no no no no.....gotta let super pac's write the laws or EVIL SOCIALISM!!! OHHHHHSCARY!!!

As for what is sometimes called "corporate welfare," I don't like that very much either, unless there is some genuine national benefit.

You seriously think education and health care aren't a national benefit?

Better yet you seriously think more equipment the pentagon doesn't even want or have space to stack up and store anymore is of MORE of a national benefit?

Is it because STALIN will get grandma?

LOL unbelievable.
 
Last edited:
You have Rachel Mad Dog with her Brownshirt reference in the OP. That's another way of making the Nazi or Hitler attack.

Bernie is a member of the Socialist Party and makes no secret of it. :eek:

So far you have proved nothing.
And again show me the link where Bernie says he is a member of the Socialist Party.
 
Believing in democratic socialism doesn't make you a member of the Socialist Party, Box. That's just you being idiotic again. There is a Socialist Party in the United States and it is running a slate for president/vice president. Sanders is neither a party member nor running on that slate. He's a member of the Democratic Party (since last year--an independent before that, with no party affiliation) and he's registered as running in the Democratic Party. Since even the article you site says he's a democratic socialist, it would be just as likely to go with the "democratic" element of that (which he has) as the "socialist" element.

You know, equating "democratic socialism" with the Socialist Party is pretty stupid. But, wait, this is you we are talking about. :rolleyes:
 
Trump militia forms to ‘forcefully protect’ rally goers against ‘far-left agitators’

Hours after a protester rushed the stage at Trump’s Dayton rally, a Twitter group called “The Lion’s Guard” called on supporters of the GOP front-runner to join a make-shift militia, according to RT.

“Do you want to provide security protection to innocent people who are subject to harassment and assault by Far-left agitators?” Lion’s Guard asked in a call to action. “If so, you are welcome to join. That’s the mission — to protect innocents who can’t hire their own security guards.”

Lion’s Guard said that their members would be unarmed, “but willing to forcefully protect people if need be.”

Within hours, the account reportedly had over 500 followers, and members were already asking for “uniform suggestions.”

Any suggestions?
 
Back
Top