Another perfect example of the Left's intolerance and opposition of free speech

[about_average]

It was a private assembly at a private venue bought and paid for by the candidate and/or his supporters. If you want to bust it up by disruptive behavior you can now expect a reaction.

If it was a private assembly they should have done a better job of checking invitations of people wanting to enter.

The UIC Pavilion is not privately owned, it's owned by the University which is a state University.

 

[miles]

http://www.myinterestingfacts.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/Jim-Crow-Laws-March.jpg

 

[about_average]

Petition on Moveon.org website to cancel the Trump rally

Note the word CANCEL, Litlibs.

Now watch them come up with their own definition of the word to suit their warped agenda.

Did the university cancel it?

 

[Ishmael]

This whole thing smacks of blaming the woman when she is raped because of her provocative clothing.

Trump says provocative things so he deserves what he gets...

We see another protestor tried to get him.

I suppose assault is free speech.

:shrug:

If the leading candidate had been Cruz, Fiorina, Carson, or Rubio the violent reaction from the Left would have been exactly the same. They consistently silence conservative voices at every opportunity.

They have zero tolerance for differences of opinion, and that's an undeniable fact.

Maybe, maybe not re. Rubio, Fiorina, et al. It would all depend on how provocative they became. What you are witnessing is the lefts reaction to their inability to mold the political dialog via the threat of violence. So the become violent. It's classic organizing technique on the part of paid agitators.

Their goal is to get people injured, especially those that are motivated to attend but really have no goal to become physical. They're even willing to take some injury themselves.............up to a point. For every one injured 2 are radicalized, or so the theory goes. Leverage off the geometric progression.

The problem they have is that those tactics were designed to be employed against the existing power structure. The police and politicians actually in power. To get that structure to react, and in reality over-react, to their antics so they can play the 'victim' card. And as witnessed by the reports of their recent activities they have willing accomplices in the press.

So when they use these tactics against someone who is NOT in power, who they have no real grievance against save they don't like what the person has to say, their antics start to ring hollow. And even worse, when it is their fellow citizens who are reacting to their disruptive and violent behavior they are in reality fomenting a civil war of sorts. A war they can't possibly hope to win.

Ishmael

 

[Ulaven_Demorte]

If it was a private assembly they should have done a better job of checking invitations of people wanting to enter.

The UIC Pavilion is not privately owned, it's owned by the University which is a state University.

Not only that, the protesters inside the rally purchased tickets. Ishmael continues his streak of being wrong about everything about which he tries to pretend to be an authority.

 

[Ulaven_Demorte]

Did the university cancel it?

Nope, and Chicago PD has said that they didn't recommend canceling the rally either.

 

[Sean]

This whole thing smacks of blaming the woman when she is raped because of her provocative clothing.

Third time I've seen this in pretty much identical language from three different people. So, which right wing blog gave you your marching orders and told you to use this line?

 

[RobDownSouth]

This whole thing smacks of blaming the woman when she is raped because of her provocative clothing.
Trump says provocative things so he deserves what he gets...
We see another protestor tried to get him.
I suppose assault is free speech.
:shrug:

Tell us again 'bout "ad hominem by class" and how "freedom of speech" implies "freedom from criticism".

 

[about_average]

Nope, and Chicago PD has said that they didn't recommend canceling the rally either.

Yeah, I know they didn't. It was a rhetorical question to highlight Mile's straw man.

 

[RobDownSouth]

Yeah, I know they didn't. It was a rhetorical question to highlight Mile's straw man.

The Usual Suspects are having to spin extra hard today to promote their "Trump as victim" hooey.

 

[cjh]

It was a private assembly at a private venue bought and paid for by the candidate and/or his supporters. If you want to bust it up by disruptive behavior you can now expect a reaction.

Ishmael

My guess is that it was an event that was open to the public.

The public is the public.

I agree, though, that attendees don't have a legal right to speak out loud or to act inside the rally so as to disrupt the rally.

Their simply being their, though, is not a disruptive act.

Dress is not a disruptive act.

Even bearing signs is not a disruptive act if pro-Trump signs were permitted.

Outside? Pure political speech in public space.

 

[Ishmael]

My guess is that it was an event that was open to the public.

The public is the public.

I agree, though, that attendees don't have a legal right to speak out loud or to act inside the rally so as to disrupt the rally.

Their simply being their, though, is not a disruptive act.

Dress is not a disruptive act.

Even bearing signs is not a disruptive act if pro-Trump signs were permitted.

Outside? Pure political speech in public space.

They were being purposefully disruptive. That is and was their goal.

And people are getting tired of putting up with that shit.

Ishmael

 

[Sean]

Hands up all those surprised at Ishtard going to bat for the Nazi?

 

[miles]

Once again if a group of Tea Partiers did this at a Clinton rally you people would go totally nuts.

Are you teaching your kids to shout someone down if they disagree with them?

 

[Sean]

Once again if a group of Tea Partiers did this at a Clinton rally you people would go totally nuts.

Are you teaching your kids to shout someone down if they disagree with them?

I'm guessing you agree with the Trump supporters telling Jewish protesters to "go to Auschwitz"?

 

[Aglaopheme]

Obama never canceled a rally due to protesters that I am aware of.

http://assets.nydailynews.com/polopoly_fs/1.399202.1314500789!/img/httpImage/image.jpg_gen/derivatives/article_970/alg-obama-gun-jpg.jpg

 

[RobDownSouth]

They were being purposefully disruptive. That is and was their goal.

And people are getting tired of putting up with that shit.

Ishmael

How dare those folks be black? Don't they know how disruptive that is? Same thing with a black president! VERY disruptive.

Once again if a group of Tea Partiers did this at a Clinton rally you people would go totally nuts.

Are you teaching your kids to shout someone down if they disagree with them?

Miles has given up on defending Trump, now he's continually throwing "what if" scenarios out as deflections, as if two wrongs make a right.

 

[about_average]

They were being purposefully disruptive. That is and was their goal.

And people are getting tired of putting up with that shit.

Probably so, on both counts. That doesn't mean his first amendment rights were violated as he claims and as Miles parrots.

 

[BotanyBoy]

Once again if a group of Tea Partiers did this at a Clinton rally you people would go totally nuts.

They would come un-fucking glued with outrage.....they would be having grand fuckin' mal seizures over the shit with #victimofvagina esploding all over the internet.

Are you teaching your kids to shout someone down if they disagree with them?

No that's Bill O'reilly.

 

[about_average]

No that's Bill O'reilly.

And Sean Hannity.

 

[Sean]

Video of Trump supporters and their respect for the free speech of Jewish protesters outside a rally:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wX1XSzteV94&feature=youtu.be

 

[miles]

When they enter the workforce I wonder how the student "protesters" will react when they don't get their way.

Hmmm........

 

[cjh]

They were being purposefully disruptive. That is and was their goal.

And people are getting tired of putting up with that shit.

Ishmael

It's funny how protestors appear at most every rally, though, and they're peacefully ejected.

Only at Trump rallies is there a threat of violence.

Funny how his rallying his supporters to act like thugs has resulted in their thuggish behavior.

 

[Disgustipated]

Once again if a group of Tea Partiers did this at a Clinton rally you people would go totally nuts.

Are you teaching your kids to shout someone down if they disagree with them?

A preemptive "but their side dd it!". miles can't even whine properly anymore.

 

[aella_345]

A preemptive "but their side dd it!". miles can't even whine properly anymore.

I'd like to make you #### whine properly.

#iloveluk #wanttogazeathispenis